- Homepage
- http://fi.linkedin.com/in/jariturkia/
- Country
- Finland
- Occupation
- ICT pro
- Hobbies
QNAP Stopping Maintenance of TS-419P II (yet again)
Monday, September 19. 2022
Back in 2018, Qnap announced to stop supporting my NAS on December 2020. They walked that date back multiple times and at the time of writing, the EOL date is on October 2022. I hope they don't mean it this time, but am afraid they will:
Recent security advisory QSA-22-24 is warning about DeadBolt Ransomware.
The campaign appears to target QNAP NAS devices running Photo Station with internet exposure.
Apparently, if you published your Photo Station photos to public Internet, your NAS-box was at risk of being encrypted and ransom would be required.
This is something similar what happened back in February 2019, see NAS-201902-13 about details of QNAPCrypt / eCh0raix. If you hadn't patched your Qnap and something crawled past the box, it was possible to brute-force their way into it aaaaand encrypt the files aaaand ransom bitcoin to restore the files. See: New eCh0raix Ransomware Brute-Forces QNAP NAS Devices
Apparently running a NAS is becoming more and more demanding. Maybe I have a wrong brand or something?
State of Ubisoft in 2022
Sunday, September 18. 2022
Hetzner outgoing mail - SMTP blocked on TCP/25
Sunday, August 28. 2022
For ages spammers' tactic has been to use either free trial of a service or payment via "liberated" credit card. As public cloud service providers want to lure in new customers, there is a habit of offering non-paid services for a period of time. All major providers like AWS, Azure and Google Cloud Platform have such free-of-charge use available.
Also smaller companies have such offering. Smaller companies (are still quite big, but not as big as biggest ones) would include Hetzner and OVHcloud. Both have number of data centers around the Europe and for any postmaster, are a royal pain in the ass. You can get a really cheap VM on either and start spewing spam email into unsuspecting SMTP-servers, like the one I maintain.
This type of free-spam-for-all isn't sustainable, or hasn't been for years, but these companies still allow it to happen. In 2021 Hetzner made a change for better. Lot wasn't communicated, however, this information was published to its customers:
Microsoft Blacklist
Microsoft maintains their own internal blacklists, which are used to reject emails coming from specific IP addresses.
Note: Entire info is available @ Hetzner website.
As a customer of Hetzner having an operational VM, I bumped into a new undocumented restriction applied to new accounts. On my own box, everything still works as usual. Has been for years. To my surprise, outgoing TCP/25 on a new account having a new VM is blocked. What!? Investigating this, led me to Hetzner customer support site, as it has following options for support request:
There is a drop-list with different types of problems having a specific category of Sending mails not possible. Apparently somebody designed the support pipeline for that particular need.
Lack of official documentation made me look in The Net. There I found a confirmation of this policy change. In June 2021 Bjørn Erling Fløtten of Norway wrote in his blog post Ditching Windows and AWS, diving into Linux and Hetzner following story:
Step 8: Setting up an email server
...
(This reminds me of the good old days when a mail server by default usually would be an open relay. Now you definitely get a more secure basic install)
Now I could actually also telnet to port 25 from my Amazon instance, and the connection appeared in the Postfix log. I have no clue why it did not work on the first attempt.
Time to ask Hetzner to open port 25 outbound (SMTP port).
(There is no mentioning of port 25 blocking anywhere on Hetzner's pages. But it is of course natural to assume that port 25 is blocked, even though the firewall administration page of Hetzner's Cloud Console says "All outbound traffic is allowed. Add a rule to restrict outbound traffic.").
So I decided to open a Support ticket, which suggest:
"Server issue"
and
"Server issue: Sending mails not possible"
Choosing the latter gives this:
"Outgoing traffic to ports 25 and 465 are blocked by default on all Cloud Servers.
A request for unblocking these ports and enabling the send mail option is only possible after the first paid invoice."Fair enough, some thrust needs to be established.
Invoice information says:
"Invoice information
You currently receive 1 invoice a month.
The invoice will be created on the following day:
...th of the month"...
Bjørn: Hint! Get a free-of-charge TLS-certificate somewhere. Most browsers refuse to enter your site. Thanks, though, for sharing your experience. Now I know to first wait for the invoice and then request for the ports to be opened.
Hetzner: Hint! Would it be smart to document all of this somewhere? Thanks for this change in your policy, though. Anybody needing SMTP will eventually get access. Deactivating option to spam at will makes life of criminals looking for the-easy-way look for other alternatives. This new policy leaves plenty of details about perpetrator's identity for police to investigate.
Update 19th Sep 2022:
Hetzners rules are both of these need to be true:
- First invoice must be paid
- Account must be at least month old
By paying, your SMTP-ports won't open. They open only after bit of a wait.
MacBook Pro - Fedora 36 sleep wake
Thursday, August 25. 2022
eSIM in iPhone
Friday, July 29. 2022
For vacation / touristing purposes, I did some travel. When leaving the comfort of EU/ETA-region cell phone mobile data changes into something tricky. Most telcos here in Finland offer you 15 GiB of roaming transfer per month inside EU/ETA. As I travelled into post-brexit UK, the gravity of current roaming agreements hit me. For those unaware (like me on London Heathrow airport): nothing works and if works, expect to pay per-GiB on gold bullions.
At hotel, free Wi-Fi was more than welcome addition to their service offering. With that I was able to figure out what the heck happened to my iPhone data and what measures could I take to enable it.
After weighing all the options, my solution was to purchase an eSIM. That's something I never even considered before. Being in "the spot" I just went for Holafly eSIM. I'm 99,9% sure their offering is not the best nor cheapest, their product simply was easily available. Their marketing must be superb!
List of options considered, but abandoned for different reasons included following:
- Not having data in my phone.
- Relying on public Wi-Fis. They were generally available in many sights and locations.
- Enabling non-EU/ETA data roaming on my subscription.
- Purchasing a prepaid SIM from nearby groceries store. They were generally available, not too expensive and easy to obtain.
This is what I paid with a credit card:
$19 USD. Living in Finland, the country most of the mobile stuff was invented at, the price for unlimited 5 day data was horrible. This is what Holafly delivered me via email:
A QR-code! What! Are eSIMs distributed as QR-codes? Really?
More googling revealed: yes, that's correct. An eSIM is essentially a QR-code.
Payload of above matrix barcode would be as follows:
LPA:1$h3a.prod.ondemandconnectivity.com$8083B8A60025B1BA0E92A460388592035501C61BB74516AB176BA714D64AD60B
Studying the topic more with eSIM Whitepaper - The what and how of Remote SIM Provisioning and How Does an eSIM Work? Acronym LPA from the QR-code stands for Local Profile Assistant. Most stuff encoded into a QR-code I've ever seen has some sort of classifier as the initial value, so having something there would be expected. Next section with $-signs contain a hostname to contact followed by a password to provide for a server answering to requests on mentioned hostname to issue details of my newly purchased subscription for my phone. Host h3a.prod.ondemandconnectivity.com translates into 91.240.72.102, property of Thales group.
After walking through iPhone new data profile wizard, this is what I ended up with:
For unknown reason, the name of my eSIM was "Travel". That's something that can be chosen and renamed, even. Taking a look into the settings of my Travel-profile reveals following:
Whoo! That's an Austrian telco 3 subscription. The name "Drei" is German and means three (3). There are number of subsidiaries on 3 or Hutchison 3G Enterprises S.A.R.L., in case you are unaware of such telco group.
Now that I had mobile data, the obvious first thing was to verify where my Internet exit-node was located at. It seemed, my IPv4-range 91.223.100.0/26 was operated by Nexthop AS from Norway. A closer look on their geo-feed at https://geofeed.wgtwo.com/geofeed.csv revealed two network ranges of /26 or 62 available addresses:
# prefix,country_code,region_code,city,postal
91.223.100.0/26,GB,ENG,London,EC2V
91.209.212.0/26,GB,ENG,London,EC2V
Ultimately I was happy. Everything worked well, my iPhone had data connection for maps, googling, mail and iMessage.
To summarize:
- My iPhone is designed in California, USA and manufactured in China.
- I purchased an eSIM from Holafly, a Spanish company.
- I paid US dollars for the product on their website located in an UK server.
- What I got delivered from the purchase was credentials to connect to a French server.
- Response payload of from the French server was an Austrian mobile data subscription.
- Subscription's public Internet exit was located at United Kingdom, operated by a Norwegian company.
That's what I call an international operation! 
PS. If you can hack the above eSIM to work for you, please inform me. It's a pre-paid, so I won't be the one taking the loss.
Euro tour 2022 pics
Thursday, July 28. 2022
As summer past time, this year I did some travelling in Europe, aka. Euro tour. It would look like this:
Pics from London, Paris and Amsterdam:
Note to City of Paris authorities:
I did post a copyrighted picture of Eiffel tower in night lighting.
Pics from a souvenir:
That's a Ducktrix which I found from Amsterdam Duck Store. Apparently this rubber duck is suffering from a System Failure, or at least that's what the text says.
ArchLinux - Pacman - GnuPG - Signature trust fail
Wednesday, July 27. 2022
Post-passwords life: Biometrics for your PC
Monday, July 4. 2022
Last year I did a few posts about passwords, example. The topic is getting worn out as we have established the fact about passwords being a poor means of authentiaction, how easily passwords leak from unsuspecting user to bad people and how you really should be using super-complex passwords which are stored in a vault. Personally I don't think there are many interesting password avenues left to explore.
This year my sights are set into life after passwords: how are we going to authenticate ourselves and what we need to do to get there.
Biometrics. A "password" everybody of us carries everywhere and is readily available to be used. Do the implementation wrong, leak that "password" and that human will be in big trouble. Biometric "password" isn't so easy to change. Impossible even (in James Bond movies, maybe). Given all the potential downsides, biometrics still beats traditional password in one crucial point: physical distance. To authenticate with biometrics you absolutely, positively need to be near the device you're about to use. A malicious cracker from other side of the world won't be able to brute-force their way trough authentication unless they have your precious device at their hand. Even attempting any hacks remotely is impossible.
While eyeballing some of the devices and computers I have at hand:
The pics are from iPhone 7, MacBook Pro and Lenovo T570. Hardware that I use regularily, but enter password rarely. There obviously exists other types of biometrics and password replacements, but I think you'll catch the general idea of life after passwords.
Then, looking at the keyboard of my gaming PC:
Something I use on daily basis, but it really puzzles me why Logitech G-513 doesn't have the fingerprint reader like most reasonable computer appliance does. Or generally speaking, if not on keyboard could my self assembled PC have a biometric reader most devices do. Why must I suffer from lack of simple, fast and reliable method of authentication? Uh??
Back-in-the-days fingerprint readers were expensive, bulky devices weren't that accurate and OS-support was mostly missing and injected via modifying operating system files. Improvements on this area is something I'd credit Apple for. They made biometric authentication commonly available for their users, when it became popular and sensor prices dropped, others followed suit.
So, I went looking for a suitable product. This is the one I ended up with:
A note: I do love their "brief" product naming! 
It is a Kensington® VeriMark™ Fingerprint Key supporting Windows Hello™ and FIDO U2F for universal 2nd-factor authentication. Pricing for one is reasonable, I paid 50€ for it. As I do own other types of USB/Bluetooth security devices, what they're asking for one is on par with market. I personally wouldn't want a security device which would be "cheapest on the market". I'd definitely go for a higher price range. My thinking is, this would be the appropriate price range for these devices.
Second note: Yes, I ended up buying a security device from company whose principal market on mechanical locks.
Here is one of those lock slots on the corner of my T570:
From left to right, there is a HDMI-port, Ethernet RJ-45 and a Kensington lock slot. You could bolt the laptop into a suitable physical object making the theft of the device really hard. Disclaimer: Any security measure can be defeated, given enough time.
Back to the product. Here is what's in the box:
That would be a very tiny USB-device. Similar sized items would be your Logitech mouse receiver or smallest WiFi dongles.
With a Linux running lsusb, following information can be retrieved:
Bus 001 Device 006: ID 06cb:0088 Synaptics, Inc.
Doing the verbose version lsusb -s 1:6 -vv, tons more is made available:
Bus 001 Device 006: ID 06cb:0088 Synaptics, Inc.
Device Descriptor:
bLength 18
bDescriptorType 1
bcdUSB 2.00
bDeviceClass 255 Vendor Specific Class
bDeviceSubClass 16
bDeviceProtocol 255
bMaxPacketSize0 8
idVendor 0x06cb Synaptics, Inc.
idProduct 0x0088
bcdDevice 1.54
iManufacturer 0
iProduct 0
iSerial 1 -redacted-
bNumConfigurations 1
Configuration Descriptor:
bLength 9
bDescriptorType 2
wTotalLength 0x0035
bNumInterfaces 1
bConfigurationValue 1
iConfiguration 0
bmAttributes 0xa0
(Bus Powered)
Remote Wakeup
MaxPower 100mA
Interface Descriptor:
bLength 9
bDescriptorType 4
bInterfaceNumber 0
bAlternateSetting 0
bNumEndpoints 5
bInterfaceClass 255 Vendor Specific Class
bInterfaceSubClass 0
bInterfaceProtocol 0
iInterface 0
Endpoint Descriptor:
bLength 7
bDescriptorType 5
bEndpointAddress 0x01 EP 1 OUT
bmAttributes 2
Transfer Type Bulk
Synch Type None
Usage Type Data
wMaxPacketSize 0x0040 1x 64 bytes
bInterval 0
Endpoint Descriptor:
bLength 7
bDescriptorType 5
bEndpointAddress 0x81 EP 1 IN
bmAttributes 2
Transfer Type Bulk
Synch Type None
Usage Type Data
wMaxPacketSize 0x0040 1x 64 bytes
bInterval 0
Endpoint Descriptor:
bLength 7
bDescriptorType 5
bEndpointAddress 0x82 EP 2 IN
bmAttributes 2
Transfer Type Bulk
Synch Type None
Usage Type Data
wMaxPacketSize 0x0040 1x 64 bytes
bInterval 0
Endpoint Descriptor:
bLength 7
bDescriptorType 5
bEndpointAddress 0x83 EP 3 IN
bmAttributes 3
Transfer Type Interrupt
Synch Type None
Usage Type Data
wMaxPacketSize 0x0008 1x 8 bytes
bInterval 4
Endpoint Descriptor:
bLength 7
bDescriptorType 5
bEndpointAddress 0x84 EP 4 IN
bmAttributes 3
Transfer Type Interrupt
Synch Type None
Usage Type Data
wMaxPacketSize 0x0010 1x 16 bytes
bInterval 10
Device Status: 0x0000
(Bus Powered)
So, this "Kensington" device is ultimately something Synaptics made. Synaptics have a solid track-record with biometrics and haptic input, so I should be safe with the product of my choice here.
For non-Windows users, the critical thing worth mentioning here is: There is no Linux support. There is no macOS support. This is only for Windows. Apparently you can go back to Windows 7 even, but sticking with 10 or 11 should be fine. A natural implication for being Windows-only leads us to following: Windows Hello is mandatory (I think you should get the hint from the product name already).
Without biometrics, I kinda catch the idea with Windows Hello. You can define a 123456-style PIN to log into your device, something very simple for anybody to remember. It's about physical proximity, you need to enter the PIN into the device, won't work over network. So, that's kinda ok(ish), but with biometrics Windows Hello kicks into a high gear. What I typically do, is define a rather complex alphanumeric PIN to my Windows and never use it again. Once you go biometrics, you won't be needing the password. Simple!
Back to the product. As these Kensington-people aren't really software-people, for installation they'll go with the absolutely bare minimum. There is no setup.exe or something any half-good Windows developer would be able to whip up. A setup which would execute pnputil -i -a synaWudfBioUsbKens.inf with free-of-charge tools like WiX would be rather trivial to do. But noooo. Nothing that fancy! They'll just provide a Zip-file of Synaptics drivers and instruct you to right click on the .inf-file:
To Windows users not accustomed to installing device drivers like that, it is a fast no-questions-asked -style process resulting in a popup:
When taking a peek into Device Manager:
My gaming PC has a biometric device in it! Whoo!
Obviously this isn't enough. Half of the job is done now. Next half is to train some of my fingers to the reader. Again, this isn't Apple, so user experience (aka. UX) is poor. There seems not to be a way to list trained fingers or remove/update them. I don't really understand the reasoning for this sucky approach by Microsoft. To move forward with this, go to Windows Settings and enable Windows Hello:
During the setup-flow of Windows Hello, you'll land at the crucial PIN-question:
Remeber to Include letters and symbols. You don't have to stick with just numbers! Of course, if that suits your needs, you can.
After that you're set! Just go hit ⊞ Win+L to lock your computer. Test how easy it is to log back in. Now, when looking at my G-513 it has the required feature my iPhone 7, MBP and Lenovo has:
Nicely done!
123RF Leak - Fallout
Sunday, July 3. 2022
Your and my data is leaked left and right all the time by organizations who at the time of you entering your precious PII (or Personally Identifiable Information) solemny swear to take really good care of it. Still they fail at it. By adapting the famous speech by John F. Kennedy: "Not because it is easy, but because it is hard." Even companies whose business is information security get hacked, or mis-configure their systems or human administrators fail at a minor thing causing major disasters, causing data to leak. Because it is very very hard to protect your data. Let alone companies whose business is not information security, they simply want to conduct their business on-line and not to focus in nurturing YOUR information. When a flaw in their system or procedures is found by malicious actors, data will be leaked.
I don't think this is about to change anytime soon. Unfortunately.
Back in 2020, a site called 123RF.com was pwned. How, or by whom is irrelevant. They failed protecting MY data. More details are available in Bleeping Computer article Popular stock photo service hit by data breach, 8.3M records for sale.
As anybody can expect, there are negative effects on such leaks. Today, such negativity manifests itself in my mailbox as follows:
A company, who has nothing to do with me is sending email to my unique 123RF-dedicated address, stating my attempt to request password recovery on their on-line service has failed. Ok, intersting. Not cool. 
However inconvenient this is to me, I fail to find the attacker's angle on this. By sending 8.3 million password recovery attempts to a public endpoint is a far fetch. They might by shear luck get access to somebody's account on the targeted site. Most likely not. But it's worth the try as it won't cost them anything and very easy to do.
This exact same has happened to me multiple times. An example from 2018 is my blog post DocuSign hacked: Fallout of leaked E-mail addresses. Given all the time and effort I put into creating mail system where I can have unique addresses to all possible use-cases it will be easy to identify the leaking source. Me and many others thought EU's GDPR was supposed to help every single Internet user with this, but still Wired is writing in their May 2022 article How GDPR Is Failing (sorry about the paywall, I'm a subscriber).
I'd like to end this by expressing my generic despair and agony not targeted towards anybody in particular while still targeted towards all stakeholders. It's a movie quote from the original -68 Planet of the Apes where at the end of the film Charlton Heston's character understands what had happened and how he ended up in that mess:
Ah, damn you! God damn you all to hell!
FTC-case: Cafepress leak
Thursday, June 30. 2022
Couple days ago I got an email to a really old address of mine. I happen to own number of domains and most of them are connected to the mail system on my home Linux server. Many many years ago I stopped using a single email address for the simple reason that I couldn't identify to whom I had given that address to. This is a design flaw in archaic asynchronous messging methods like snail mail, telephone calls or SMTP. You simply don't know who is contacting you and where did they obtain your information from.
To defeat this design flaw I have an unique email address for every single service I ever hand my information to. That particular address in question pre-dates my system and is roughly 20 years old. So, no way of knowing who originally leaked it or how many times the address has been leaked. As I don't use it anywhere anymore, an email sent there is with 99,9% confidence junk.
Why I'm writing about that email is obvious, it had very interesting content. Sender claimed to be (a company?) called CafePress. Something I've never head of. Another reason why I kept investigating this maybe-spam was the subject of "Notice of FTC Settlement - 2019 Data Breach". Ok. Federal Trade Commission of USA was addressing me via CafePress. Really interesting!
First the technical ones. To deduce if this was spam or not, I always check the mail headers. This baby had both SPF and DKIM verified correctly. Both technical measures are pretty much a must for anybody to accept the incoming set of bytes. Well, also spammers know this and typically use Google or Microsoft as spam platforms via their free-of-charge mail offerings.
As technical details checked out, next the actual sending server. It originated to something called https://www.sparkpost.com/. Again, something I've never heard of. Ultimately this mail passed all techical checks. My thinking started leaning towards this being the Real Deal.
Email contents:
Dear Valued Customer,
We are contacting you about the 2019 breach of your information collected by the prior owners of CafePress. This notice is about that breach, which you may have already been notified of.
We recently reached a settlement with the Federal Trade Commission, the nation's consumer protection agency, to resolve issues related to the 2019 data breach, and to make sure CafePress keeps your information safe. What happened?
Before November 2019, CafePress didn't have reasonable practices to keep your information safe. When the company had a security breach, the following information about you may have been stolen: your email address, password, name, address, phone number, answers to your security questions, and the expiration date and last four digits of your credit card.
What you can do to protect yourself
Here are some steps to reduce the risk of identity theft and protect your information online:
<blah blah removed>
Sincerely,
Chris Klingebiel
General Manager, CafePress
Hm. Interesting.
Somebody in a company I've never heard of leaked my data in 2019 by a hack. Well, why did they have my information on the first place!
Googling the topic for more details:
Article Commission orders e-commerce platform to bolster data security and provide redress to small businesses is available on FTC.gov. It was legit after all!
Press release mentionded following: "Residual Pumpkin Entity, LLC, the former owner of CafePress, and PlanetArt, LLC, which bought CafePress in 2020". Whoa! Even more companies which I never heard of.
Some highlights:
According to the complaint, a hacker exploited the company’s security failures in February 2019 to access millions of email addresses and passwords with weak encryption; millions of unencrypted names, physical addresses, and security questions and answers; more than 180,000 unencrypted Social Security numbers; and tens of thousands of partial payment card numbers and expiration dates.
Obviously this CafePress (or whoever it is) didn't do much of a job for protecting their stolen/bought/downloaded-from-DarkNet -data. It's a good thing FTC gave them a slap-on-the-wrist -punishment as the company is clearly crooked. Why an earth didn't FTC do more follow up on the origins of the data? I'd definitely love to hear how this CafePress got my data into their hands. I didn't volunteer it, that's for sure!
Really puzzling case this. I suppose it speaks volumes about the modern state of Internet.
Breaking the paywall - Follow up
Wednesday, June 22. 2022
Back-in-the-day, roughly three years ago, I wrote a JavaScriptlet for breaking trough a press website's paywall. At the time I promised not to "piss" into their proverbial coffee pot and not publish updated versions of my hack. I kept my word. It was surprisingly easy! They didn't change a thing. Until now.
This particular ICT-media finally realized their client tell to contain mostly smart people with good computer skills. Just clicking a button on your shortcuts-bar of your chosen web browser after reading 5 articles was too easy. They finally went into full-blown hedgehog defense and enabled two measures:
- Without authentication, your IPv4-address is tracked.
- No cookies required
- Doesn't care which browser on which computer you're using
- There is a very small number of free-of-charge articles you can read per day. I'd say 5.
- Unfortunately their AWS-setup doesn't have IPv6 enabled. With that I'd have much more IP-addresses at my disposal.
- With authentication, the number of free-of-charge articles is limited. I'd guess to 10 of them.
For proper paywall breakage, lots of IPv4-addresses would be required. I do have some, but I'd rather not play this game anymore. I'll call it quits and stick with the headers of their RSS-feed. Obviously, they'll limit the feed into last 10 articles, but if you keep reading and accumulating the data 24/7, you'll get all of them.
Good job! One potential customer lost.
Google Analytics 4 migration
Monday, June 20. 2022
For number of reasons, instead of migration, I should write migraine. First is about moving from an old system into a new one. Latter is about medical condition causing severe headaches. In this case, there seems to be not much of a difference.
Google's own Make the switch to Google Analytics 4 -migration guide has 12 steps. Given complexity, the time I have to invest on this and lack of really diving into this, I probably missed most of them.
Going into GA4-console, I have this:
Clicking on Get Tagging Instructions, I'll get further information:
There is a snippet of JavaScript, which I can inject into this site.
<script async="" src="https://www.googletagmanager.com/gtag/js?id=G-859QZJED94"></script>
<script>
window.dataLayer = window.dataLayer || [];
function gtag(){dataLayer.push(arguments);}
gtag('js', new Date());
gtag('config', 'G-859QZJED94');
</script>
Note: My GA4-stream ID is G-859QZJED94. Make sure to use yours, not mine. As the stream ID cannot be a secret, it's ok to publish it here. The same ID can be found from HTML-code of this page.
To verify installation success, I went to GA4 portal, chose Reports and Realtime. It didn't take long, less than a minute, for that report to indicate user activity. Many other places keep saying "No data received from your website yet", "No data received in past 48 hours" or "Data collection isn’t active for your website". IMHO all of those are incorrect, as I do have stats. We'll see if I managed to do that right.
Megazoning (or Laser Tagging) part 2, Year 2022 edition
Sunday, May 22. 2022
Quite close six years ago, I posted about my visit in Megazone. Now I got to go there again. This time there were more of us and we had a private game for the company.
Round 1
This was me getting the look and feel how this game worked.
Oh boy our team sucked! (Sorry my colleagues, not sorry.)
Obviously I was the best in our green team, but I ranked 11th out of 30. Looking at the scores, red team was way too good for us and blue team had couple guys better than me.
Round 2
I'm not exactly sure, but somehow this turned into a base defense. Other teams were convinced they had to rape our base and me and another member of my red team were almost constantly defending our base.
This turn of events ended me being 4th out of 32 players. Actually, not missing the 2nd position by too much.
Round 3
This round was full-on base defense 100% of the time. There were 5 or 6 players of our team doing base defense to our blue team. Way too many players on other teams were keen on getting their 2000 pts on our base.
Btw, I'm pretty sure we fended them on each attack wave.
Mentally I'd love to do more freeroaming than doing area defense. I didn't enjoy this kind of game that much so I simply gave up. I wasn't moving nearly as much as reasonable Laser Tag tactics dictates. Being stationary will result in a below medium score and position 18th out of 30.
Overall
I still can get my kick out of round 2 while zapping attackers on left and right. That was fun!
However, I'll be waiting for the release of Sniper Elite 5 next week, I know I will enjoy video gaming more than IRL gaming.
Diverse spam
Thursday, May 5. 2022
It seems detecting and blocking email spam is easy. That's something I stated in my blog post back in 2020.
Here I'm introducing three types of spam I'm getting.
Spam from free email accounts
But wait! That's not new. We've seen email originating from Yahoo for many years.
What is new, the fact that increasing number of spammers are creating tons of accounts into Gmail or Outlook.com. As both free-of-charge services limit the amount of email one can send during 24 hours into 500, quite a lot of accounts are needed. As example, see Gmail's Limits for sending & getting mail.
The reason those two services are used for spamming is the good reputation and both are well accepted among postmasters. As an example I won't block neither of them and consider both being as reliable. As end result, majority of spam I receive is from either of those. To weed of bad ones from good ones, traditional spam-filtering will do the trick.
What's good is both Microsoft and Google are really good in detecting ill behaviour and stopping the activity. However, criminals are really good in spending their 500 mails effectively to make their behaviour as "natural" as possible. Neither service provider isn't fast/good enough to detect and stop the activity. Unfortunately.
SMS / iMessage spam
Getting spam via SMS isn't new, but getting junk from Apple iMessage is. Here is a sample:
For non-Finnish readers, the spam says I've been selected for a part time job. Daily salary range is from 10 to 200 euros.
It seems this weird scam is active all over Europe. See iPhone users lament for spam messages via iMessage. Unlike Android, iPhone doesn't have any mechanisms for detecting SMS-spam. Maybe it should?
Probably those spammers didn't even break anything (much). It is likely they've automated something to be able to send crap to everybody. I don't think iMessage protocol isn't broken nor Apple's authentication. All those jerks did was automate the thing to the hilt.
GPG spam
When spam arrives in a heavily encrypted email, then you'll know it must be very important! Here is one I got encrypted with my GPG-key:
What's weird is the choice of language. That sample is in Burmese, but I got one in Hindi and Telugu. All of which point heavily to Asia and specifically to Indian region. I have no idea why I got those as I definitely need Google Translate to decipher those.
I have no idea how my address leaked, but the one I'm using is from https://keyserver.pgp.com/, a directory where I choose to publish my PGP / GPG public key. Maybe somebody hacked that? Or just iterated all possible keys. I dunno.
Wrap-up
I see all this as a beginning. Email generally is losing emphasis and Discord / Teams / Slack are gaining on that. Spammers are getting really creative and I'm sure criminals will diversify more. Back-in-the-days Skype spam was a a real thing, see my article from 2016 on that.
