ChromeOS Flex test drive
Monday, October 10. 2022
Would you like to run an operating system which ships as-is, no changes allowed after installation? Can you imagine your mobile phone without apps of your own choosing? Your Windows10 PC? Your macOS Monterey? Most of us cannot.
As a computer enthusiast, of course I had to try such a feat!
Prerequisites
How to get your ball rolling, check out Chrome OS Flex installation guide @ Google. What you'll need is a supported hardware. In the installation guide, there is a certified models list and it will contain a LOT of supported PC and Mac models. My own victim/subject/target was 12 year old Lenovo and even that is in the certified list! WARNING: The hard drive of the victim computer will be erased beyond data recovery.
The second thing you'll need is an USB-stick to boot your destination ChromeOS. Any capacity will do. I had a 32 GiB stick and it used 128 MiB of it. That's less than 1% of the capacity. So, any booting stick will do the trick for you. Also, you won't be needing the stick after install, requirement is to just briefly slip an installer into it, boot and be done.
Third and final thing you'll be needing is a Google Chrome browser and ChromeOS recovery media extension into it:
To clarify, let's repeat that:
Your initial installation into your USB-stick will be done from Google Chrome browser using a specific extension in it.
Yes. It sounds bit unorthodox or different than other OS does. Given Google's reach on web browser users, that seemed like the best idea. This extension will work in any OS.
To log into your ChromeOS, you will need a Google Account. Most people on this planet do have one, so most likely you're covered. On the other hand, if your religious beliefs are strongly anti-Google, the likelihood of you running an opearting system made by Google is low. You rare person won't be able to log in, but everybody else will.
Creating installation media
Running the extension:
That's it. As there won't be much data on the stick, the creation flys by fast!
Installing ChromeOS Flex
If media creation was fast, this will be even faster.
Just boot the newly crated stick and that's pretty much it. The installer won't store much information to the drive, so you will be done in a jiffy.
Running ChromeOS Flex
Log into the machine with your Google Account. Remenber: This OS won't work without a network connection. You really really will need active network connection to use this one.
All you have is set of Google's own apps: Chrome, Gmail, YouTube and such. By looking at the list in Find apps for your Chromebook, you'd initially think all is good and you can have our favorite apps in it. To make your (mis)belief stronger, even Google Play is there for you to run and search apps. Harsh reality sets in quite fast: you can not install anything via Google Play. All the apps in Google Play are for Android or real ChromeOS, not for Flex. Reason is obvious: your platform is running AMD-64 CPU and all the apps are for ARM. This may change in the future, but at the time of writing it is what it is.
You lose a lot, but there is something good in this trade-off. As you literally can not install anything, not even malware can be installed. ChromeOS Flex has to be the safest OS ever made! Most systems in the world are manufactured from ground up to be generic and be able to run anything. This puppy isn't.
SSH
After initial investigation, without apps, without password manager, without anything, I was about to throw the laptop back to its original dust gathering duty. What good is a PC which runs a Chrome browser and nothing else? Then I found the terminal. It won't let you to actually enter the shell of our ChromeOS laptop. It will let you SSH to somewhere else.
On my own boxes, I'll always deactivate plaintext passwords, so I bumped into a problem. From where do I get the private key for SSH-session? Obvious answer is either via Google Drive (<shivers>) or via USB-stick. You can import a key to the laptop and not worry about that anymore.
Word of caution: Think very carefully if you want to store your private keys in a system managed for you by Google.
Biggest drawbacks
For this system to be actually usable, I'd need:
- Proper Wi-Fi. This 12 year old laptop had only Wi-Fi 4 (802.11n)
- This I managed to solve by using an Asus USB-AC51 -dongle to get Wi-Fi 5.
- lsusb:
ID 0b05:17d1 ASUSTek Computer, Inc. AC51 802.11a/b/g/n/ac Wireless Adapter [Mediatek MT7610U]
- This won't solve my home network's need for Wi-Fi 6, but gets me to The Net.
- There is no list of supported USB-devices. I have bunch of 802.11ac USB-sticks and this is the only one to work in ChromeOS Flex.
- My password manager and passwords in it
- No apps means: no apps, not even password manager
- What good is a browser when you cannot log into anything. All my passwords are random and ridiculously complex. They were not designed to be remembered nor typed.
- In The world's BEST password advice, Mr. Horowitz said: "The most secure Operating System most people have access to is a Chromebook running in Guest Mode."
Nuisances
Installer won't let you change keyboard layout. If you have US keyboard, fine. If you don't, it sucks for you.
Partitions
As this is a PC, the partition table has EFI boot. Is running EXT-4 and EXT-2 partitions. Contains encrypted home drive. It's basically a hybrid between an Android phone and a Linux laptop.
My 240 GiB SSH installed as follows:
Partition Table: gpt
Disk Flags:
Number Start End Size File system Name Flags
11 32.8kB 33.3kB 512B RWFW
6 33.3kB 33.8kB 512B KERN-C chromeos_kernel
7 33.8kB 34.3kB 512B ROOT-C
9 34.3kB 34.8kB 512B reserved
10 34.8kB 35.3kB 512B reserved
2 35.3kB 16.8MB 16.8MB KERN-A chromeos_kernel
4 16.8MB 33.6MB 16.8MB KERN-B chromeos_kernel
8 35.7MB 52.4MB 16.8MB ext4 OEM
12 52.4MB 120MB 67.1MB fat16 EFI-SYSTEM boot, legacy_boot, esp
5 120MB 4415MB 4295MB ext2 ROOT-B
3 4415MB 8709MB 4295MB ext2 ROOT-A
1 8709MB 240GB 231GB ext4 STATE
Finally
This is either for explorers who want to try stuff out or alternatively for people whose needs are extremely limited. If all you do is surf the web or YouTube then this might be for you. Anything special --> forget about it.
The best part with this is the price. I had the old laptop already, so cost was $0.
Would you like to run an operating system which ships as-is, no changes allowed after installation? Can you imagine your mobile phone without apps of your own choosing? Your Windows10 PC? Your macOS Monterey? Most of us cannot.
As a computer enthusiast, of course I had to try such a feat!
Prerequisites
How to get your ball rolling, check out Chrome OS Flex installation guide @ Google. What you'll need is a supported hardware. In the installation guide, there is a certified models list and it will contain a LOT of supported PC and Mac models. My own victim/subject/target was 12 year old Lenovo and even that is in the certified list! WARNING: The hard drive of the victim computer will be erased beyond data recovery.
The second thing you'll need is an USB-stick to boot your destination ChromeOS. Any capacity will do. I had a 32 GiB stick and it used 128 MiB of it. That's less than 1% of the capacity. So, any booting stick will do the trick for you. Also, you won't be needing the stick after install, requirement is to just briefly slip an installer into it, boot and be done.
Third and final thing you'll be needing is a Google Chrome browser and ChromeOS recovery media extension into it:
To clarify, let's repeat that:
Your initial installation into your USB-stick will be done from Google Chrome browser using a specific extension in it.
Yes. It sounds bit unorthodox or different than other OS does. Given Google's reach on web browser users, that seemed like the best idea. This extension will work in any OS.
To log into your ChromeOS, you will need a Google Account. Most people on this planet do have one, so most likely you're covered. On the other hand, if your religious beliefs are strongly anti-Google, the likelihood of you running an opearting system made by Google is low. You rare person won't be able to log in, but everybody else will.
Creating installation media
Running the extension:
That's it. As there won't be much data on the stick, the creation flys by fast!
Installing ChromeOS Flex
If media creation was fast, this will be even faster.
Just boot the newly crated stick and that's pretty much it. The installer won't store much information to the drive, so you will be done in a jiffy.
Running ChromeOS Flex
Log into the machine with your Google Account. Remenber: This OS won't work without a network connection. You really really will need active network connection to use this one.
All you have is set of Google's own apps: Chrome, Gmail, YouTube and such. By looking at the list in Find apps for your Chromebook, you'd initially think all is good and you can have our favorite apps in it. To make your (mis)belief stronger, even Google Play is there for you to run and search apps. Harsh reality sets in quite fast: you can not install anything via Google Play. All the apps in Google Play are for Android or real ChromeOS, not for Flex. Reason is obvious: your platform is running AMD-64 CPU and all the apps are for ARM. This may change in the future, but at the time of writing it is what it is.
You lose a lot, but there is something good in this trade-off. As you literally can not install anything, not even malware can be installed. ChromeOS Flex has to be the safest OS ever made! Most systems in the world are manufactured from ground up to be generic and be able to run anything. This puppy isn't.
SSH
After initial investigation, without apps, without password manager, without anything, I was about to throw the laptop back to its original dust gathering duty. What good is a PC which runs a Chrome browser and nothing else? Then I found the terminal. It won't let you to actually enter the shell of our ChromeOS laptop. It will let you SSH to somewhere else.
On my own boxes, I'll always deactivate plaintext passwords, so I bumped into a problem. From where do I get the private key for SSH-session? Obvious answer is either via Google Drive (<shivers>) or via USB-stick. You can import a key to the laptop and not worry about that anymore.
Word of caution: Think very carefully if you want to store your private keys in a system managed for you by Google.
Biggest drawbacks
For this system to be actually usable, I'd need:
- Proper Wi-Fi. This 12 year old laptop had only Wi-Fi 4 (802.11n)
- This I managed to solve by using an Asus USB-AC51 -dongle to get Wi-Fi 5.
- lsusb:
ID 0b05:17d1 ASUSTek Computer, Inc. AC51 802.11a/b/g/n/ac Wireless Adapter [Mediatek MT7610U] - This won't solve my home network's need for Wi-Fi 6, but gets me to The Net.
- There is no list of supported USB-devices. I have bunch of 802.11ac USB-sticks and this is the only one to work in ChromeOS Flex.
- My password manager and passwords in it
- No apps means: no apps, not even password manager
- What good is a browser when you cannot log into anything. All my passwords are random and ridiculously complex. They were not designed to be remembered nor typed.
- In The world's BEST password advice, Mr. Horowitz said: "The most secure Operating System most people have access to is a Chromebook running in Guest Mode."
Nuisances
Installer won't let you change keyboard layout. If you have US keyboard, fine. If you don't, it sucks for you.
Partitions
As this is a PC, the partition table has EFI boot. Is running EXT-4 and EXT-2 partitions. Contains encrypted home drive. It's basically a hybrid between an Android phone and a Linux laptop.
My 240 GiB SSH installed as follows:
Partition Table: gpt
Disk Flags:
Number Start End Size File system Name Flags
11 32.8kB 33.3kB 512B RWFW
6 33.3kB 33.8kB 512B KERN-C chromeos_kernel
7 33.8kB 34.3kB 512B ROOT-C
9 34.3kB 34.8kB 512B reserved
10 34.8kB 35.3kB 512B reserved
2 35.3kB 16.8MB 16.8MB KERN-A chromeos_kernel
4 16.8MB 33.6MB 16.8MB KERN-B chromeos_kernel
8 35.7MB 52.4MB 16.8MB ext4 OEM
12 52.4MB 120MB 67.1MB fat16 EFI-SYSTEM boot, legacy_boot, esp
5 120MB 4415MB 4295MB ext2 ROOT-B
3 4415MB 8709MB 4295MB ext2 ROOT-A
1 8709MB 240GB 231GB ext4 STATE
Finally
This is either for explorers who want to try stuff out or alternatively for people whose needs are extremely limited. If all you do is surf the web or YouTube then this might be for you. Anything special --> forget about it.
The best part with this is the price. I had the old laptop already, so cost was $0.
MacBook Pro - Fedora 36 sleep wake - part 2
Friday, September 30. 2022
MacBook Pro - Fedora 36 sleep wake
Thursday, August 25. 2022
ArchLinux - Pacman - GnuPG - Signature trust fail
Wednesday, July 27. 2022
Post-passwords life: Biometrics for your PC
Monday, July 4. 2022
Last year I did a few posts about passwords, example. The topic is getting worn out as we have established the fact about passwords being a poor means of authentiaction, how easily passwords leak from unsuspecting user to bad people and how you really should be using super-complex passwords which are stored in a vault. Personally I don't think there are many interesting password avenues left to explore.
This year my sights are set into life after passwords: how are we going to authenticate ourselves and what we need to do to get there.
Biometrics. A "password" everybody of us carries everywhere and is readily available to be used. Do the implementation wrong, leak that "password" and that human will be in big trouble. Biometric "password" isn't so easy to change. Impossible even (in James Bond movies, maybe). Given all the potential downsides, biometrics still beats traditional password in one crucial point: physical distance. To authenticate with biometrics you absolutely, positively need to be near the device you're about to use. A malicious cracker from other side of the world won't be able to brute-force their way trough authentication unless they have your precious device at their hand. Even attempting any hacks remotely is impossible.
While eyeballing some of the devices and computers I have at hand:
The pics are from iPhone 7, MacBook Pro and Lenovo T570. Hardware that I use regularily, but enter password rarely. There obviously exists other types of biometrics and password replacements, but I think you'll catch the general idea of life after passwords.
Then, looking at the keyboard of my gaming PC:
Something I use on daily basis, but it really puzzles me why Logitech G-513 doesn't have the fingerprint reader like most reasonable computer appliance does. Or generally speaking, if not on keyboard could my self assembled PC have a biometric reader most devices do. Why must I suffer from lack of simple, fast and reliable method of authentication? Uh??
Back-in-the-days fingerprint readers were expensive, bulky devices weren't that accurate and OS-support was mostly missing and injected via modifying operating system files. Improvements on this area is something I'd credit Apple for. They made biometric authentication commonly available for their users, when it became popular and sensor prices dropped, others followed suit.
So, I went looking for a suitable product. This is the one I ended up with:
A note: I do love their "brief" product naming! 
It is a Kensington® VeriMark™ Fingerprint Key supporting Windows Hello™ and FIDO U2F for universal 2nd-factor authentication. Pricing for one is reasonable, I paid 50€ for it. As I do own other types of USB/Bluetooth security devices, what they're asking for one is on par with market. I personally wouldn't want a security device which would be "cheapest on the market". I'd definitely go for a higher price range. My thinking is, this would be the appropriate price range for these devices.
Second note: Yes, I ended up buying a security device from company whose principal market on mechanical locks.
Here is one of those lock slots on the corner of my T570:
From left to right, there is a HDMI-port, Ethernet RJ-45 and a Kensington lock slot. You could bolt the laptop into a suitable physical object making the theft of the device really hard. Disclaimer: Any security measure can be defeated, given enough time.
Back to the product. Here is what's in the box:
That would be a very tiny USB-device. Similar sized items would be your Logitech mouse receiver or smallest WiFi dongles.
With a Linux running lsusb, following information can be retrieved:
Bus 001 Device 006: ID 06cb:0088 Synaptics, Inc.
Doing the verbose version lsusb -s 1:6 -vv, tons more is made available:
Bus 001 Device 006: ID 06cb:0088 Synaptics, Inc.
Device Descriptor:
bLength 18
bDescriptorType 1
bcdUSB 2.00
bDeviceClass 255 Vendor Specific Class
bDeviceSubClass 16
bDeviceProtocol 255
bMaxPacketSize0 8
idVendor 0x06cb Synaptics, Inc.
idProduct 0x0088
bcdDevice 1.54
iManufacturer 0
iProduct 0
iSerial 1 -redacted-
bNumConfigurations 1
Configuration Descriptor:
bLength 9
bDescriptorType 2
wTotalLength 0x0035
bNumInterfaces 1
bConfigurationValue 1
iConfiguration 0
bmAttributes 0xa0
(Bus Powered)
Remote Wakeup
MaxPower 100mA
Interface Descriptor:
bLength 9
bDescriptorType 4
bInterfaceNumber 0
bAlternateSetting 0
bNumEndpoints 5
bInterfaceClass 255 Vendor Specific Class
bInterfaceSubClass 0
bInterfaceProtocol 0
iInterface 0
Endpoint Descriptor:
bLength 7
bDescriptorType 5
bEndpointAddress 0x01 EP 1 OUT
bmAttributes 2
Transfer Type Bulk
Synch Type None
Usage Type Data
wMaxPacketSize 0x0040 1x 64 bytes
bInterval 0
Endpoint Descriptor:
bLength 7
bDescriptorType 5
bEndpointAddress 0x81 EP 1 IN
bmAttributes 2
Transfer Type Bulk
Synch Type None
Usage Type Data
wMaxPacketSize 0x0040 1x 64 bytes
bInterval 0
Endpoint Descriptor:
bLength 7
bDescriptorType 5
bEndpointAddress 0x82 EP 2 IN
bmAttributes 2
Transfer Type Bulk
Synch Type None
Usage Type Data
wMaxPacketSize 0x0040 1x 64 bytes
bInterval 0
Endpoint Descriptor:
bLength 7
bDescriptorType 5
bEndpointAddress 0x83 EP 3 IN
bmAttributes 3
Transfer Type Interrupt
Synch Type None
Usage Type Data
wMaxPacketSize 0x0008 1x 8 bytes
bInterval 4
Endpoint Descriptor:
bLength 7
bDescriptorType 5
bEndpointAddress 0x84 EP 4 IN
bmAttributes 3
Transfer Type Interrupt
Synch Type None
Usage Type Data
wMaxPacketSize 0x0010 1x 16 bytes
bInterval 10
Device Status: 0x0000
(Bus Powered)
So, this "Kensington" device is ultimately something Synaptics made. Synaptics have a solid track-record with biometrics and haptic input, so I should be safe with the product of my choice here.
For non-Windows users, the critical thing worth mentioning here is: There is no Linux support. There is no macOS support. This is only for Windows. Apparently you can go back to Windows 7 even, but sticking with 10 or 11 should be fine. A natural implication for being Windows-only leads us to following: Windows Hello is mandatory (I think you should get the hint from the product name already).
Without biometrics, I kinda catch the idea with Windows Hello. You can define a 123456-style PIN to log into your device, something very simple for anybody to remember. It's about physical proximity, you need to enter the PIN into the device, won't work over network. So, that's kinda ok(ish), but with biometrics Windows Hello kicks into a high gear. What I typically do, is define a rather complex alphanumeric PIN to my Windows and never use it again. Once you go biometrics, you won't be needing the password. Simple!
Back to the product. As these Kensington-people aren't really software-people, for installation they'll go with the absolutely bare minimum. There is no setup.exe or something any half-good Windows developer would be able to whip up. A setup which would execute pnputil -i -a synaWudfBioUsbKens.inf with free-of-charge tools like WiX would be rather trivial to do. But noooo. Nothing that fancy! They'll just provide a Zip-file of Synaptics drivers and instruct you to right click on the .inf-file:
To Windows users not accustomed to installing device drivers like that, it is a fast no-questions-asked -style process resulting in a popup:
When taking a peek into Device Manager:
My gaming PC has a biometric device in it! Whoo!
Obviously this isn't enough. Half of the job is done now. Next half is to train some of my fingers to the reader. Again, this isn't Apple, so user experience (aka. UX) is poor. There seems not to be a way to list trained fingers or remove/update them. I don't really understand the reasoning for this sucky approach by Microsoft. To move forward with this, go to Windows Settings and enable Windows Hello:
During the setup-flow of Windows Hello, you'll land at the crucial PIN-question:
Remeber to Include letters and symbols. You don't have to stick with just numbers! Of course, if that suits your needs, you can.
After that you're set! Just go hit ⊞ Win+L to lock your computer. Test how easy it is to log back in. Now, when looking at my G-513 it has the required feature my iPhone 7, MBP and Lenovo has:
Nicely done!
Last year I did a few posts about passwords, example. The topic is getting worn out as we have established the fact about passwords being a poor means of authentiaction, how easily passwords leak from unsuspecting user to bad people and how you really should be using super-complex passwords which are stored in a vault. Personally I don't think there are many interesting password avenues left to explore.
This year my sights are set into life after passwords: how are we going to authenticate ourselves and what we need to do to get there.
Biometrics. A "password" everybody of us carries everywhere and is readily available to be used. Do the implementation wrong, leak that "password" and that human will be in big trouble. Biometric "password" isn't so easy to change. Impossible even (in James Bond movies, maybe). Given all the potential downsides, biometrics still beats traditional password in one crucial point: physical distance. To authenticate with biometrics you absolutely, positively need to be near the device you're about to use. A malicious cracker from other side of the world won't be able to brute-force their way trough authentication unless they have your precious device at their hand. Even attempting any hacks remotely is impossible.
While eyeballing some of the devices and computers I have at hand:
The pics are from iPhone 7, MacBook Pro and Lenovo T570. Hardware that I use regularily, but enter password rarely. There obviously exists other types of biometrics and password replacements, but I think you'll catch the general idea of life after passwords.
Then, looking at the keyboard of my gaming PC:
Something I use on daily basis, but it really puzzles me why Logitech G-513 doesn't have the fingerprint reader like most reasonable computer appliance does. Or generally speaking, if not on keyboard could my self assembled PC have a biometric reader most devices do. Why must I suffer from lack of simple, fast and reliable method of authentication? Uh??
Back-in-the-days fingerprint readers were expensive, bulky devices weren't that accurate and OS-support was mostly missing and injected via modifying operating system files. Improvements on this area is something I'd credit Apple for. They made biometric authentication commonly available for their users, when it became popular and sensor prices dropped, others followed suit.
So, I went looking for a suitable product. This is the one I ended up with:
A note: I do love their "brief" product naming!
It is a Kensington® VeriMark™ Fingerprint Key supporting Windows Hello™ and FIDO U2F for universal 2nd-factor authentication. Pricing for one is reasonable, I paid 50€ for it. As I do own other types of USB/Bluetooth security devices, what they're asking for one is on par with market. I personally wouldn't want a security device which would be "cheapest on the market". I'd definitely go for a higher price range. My thinking is, this would be the appropriate price range for these devices.
Second note: Yes, I ended up buying a security device from company whose principal market on mechanical locks.
Here is one of those lock slots on the corner of my T570:
From left to right, there is a HDMI-port, Ethernet RJ-45 and a Kensington lock slot. You could bolt the laptop into a suitable physical object making the theft of the device really hard. Disclaimer: Any security measure can be defeated, given enough time.
Back to the product. Here is what's in the box:
That would be a very tiny USB-device. Similar sized items would be your Logitech mouse receiver or smallest WiFi dongles.
With a Linux running lsusb, following information can be retrieved:
Bus 001 Device 006: ID 06cb:0088 Synaptics, Inc.
Doing the verbose version lsusb -s 1:6 -vv, tons more is made available:
Bus 001 Device 006: ID 06cb:0088 Synaptics, Inc.
Device Descriptor:
bLength 18
bDescriptorType 1
bcdUSB 2.00
bDeviceClass 255 Vendor Specific Class
bDeviceSubClass 16
bDeviceProtocol 255
bMaxPacketSize0 8
idVendor 0x06cb Synaptics, Inc.
idProduct 0x0088
bcdDevice 1.54
iManufacturer 0
iProduct 0
iSerial 1 -redacted-
bNumConfigurations 1
Configuration Descriptor:
bLength 9
bDescriptorType 2
wTotalLength 0x0035
bNumInterfaces 1
bConfigurationValue 1
iConfiguration 0
bmAttributes 0xa0
(Bus Powered)
Remote Wakeup
MaxPower 100mA
Interface Descriptor:
bLength 9
bDescriptorType 4
bInterfaceNumber 0
bAlternateSetting 0
bNumEndpoints 5
bInterfaceClass 255 Vendor Specific Class
bInterfaceSubClass 0
bInterfaceProtocol 0
iInterface 0
Endpoint Descriptor:
bLength 7
bDescriptorType 5
bEndpointAddress 0x01 EP 1 OUT
bmAttributes 2
Transfer Type Bulk
Synch Type None
Usage Type Data
wMaxPacketSize 0x0040 1x 64 bytes
bInterval 0
Endpoint Descriptor:
bLength 7
bDescriptorType 5
bEndpointAddress 0x81 EP 1 IN
bmAttributes 2
Transfer Type Bulk
Synch Type None
Usage Type Data
wMaxPacketSize 0x0040 1x 64 bytes
bInterval 0
Endpoint Descriptor:
bLength 7
bDescriptorType 5
bEndpointAddress 0x82 EP 2 IN
bmAttributes 2
Transfer Type Bulk
Synch Type None
Usage Type Data
wMaxPacketSize 0x0040 1x 64 bytes
bInterval 0
Endpoint Descriptor:
bLength 7
bDescriptorType 5
bEndpointAddress 0x83 EP 3 IN
bmAttributes 3
Transfer Type Interrupt
Synch Type None
Usage Type Data
wMaxPacketSize 0x0008 1x 8 bytes
bInterval 4
Endpoint Descriptor:
bLength 7
bDescriptorType 5
bEndpointAddress 0x84 EP 4 IN
bmAttributes 3
Transfer Type Interrupt
Synch Type None
Usage Type Data
wMaxPacketSize 0x0010 1x 16 bytes
bInterval 10
Device Status: 0x0000
(Bus Powered)
So, this "Kensington" device is ultimately something Synaptics made. Synaptics have a solid track-record with biometrics and haptic input, so I should be safe with the product of my choice here.
For non-Windows users, the critical thing worth mentioning here is: There is no Linux support. There is no macOS support. This is only for Windows. Apparently you can go back to Windows 7 even, but sticking with 10 or 11 should be fine. A natural implication for being Windows-only leads us to following: Windows Hello is mandatory (I think you should get the hint from the product name already).
Without biometrics, I kinda catch the idea with Windows Hello. You can define a 123456-style PIN to log into your device, something very simple for anybody to remember. It's about physical proximity, you need to enter the PIN into the device, won't work over network. So, that's kinda ok(ish), but with biometrics Windows Hello kicks into a high gear. What I typically do, is define a rather complex alphanumeric PIN to my Windows and never use it again. Once you go biometrics, you won't be needing the password. Simple!
Back to the product. As these Kensington-people aren't really software-people, for installation they'll go with the absolutely bare minimum. There is no setup.exe or something any half-good Windows developer would be able to whip up. A setup which would execute pnputil -i -a synaWudfBioUsbKens.inf with free-of-charge tools like WiX would be rather trivial to do. But noooo. Nothing that fancy! They'll just provide a Zip-file of Synaptics drivers and instruct you to right click on the .inf-file:
To Windows users not accustomed to installing device drivers like that, it is a fast no-questions-asked -style process resulting in a popup:
When taking a peek into Device Manager:
My gaming PC has a biometric device in it! Whoo!
Obviously this isn't enough. Half of the job is done now. Next half is to train some of my fingers to the reader. Again, this isn't Apple, so user experience (aka. UX) is poor. There seems not to be a way to list trained fingers or remove/update them. I don't really understand the reasoning for this sucky approach by Microsoft. To move forward with this, go to Windows Settings and enable Windows Hello:
During the setup-flow of Windows Hello, you'll land at the crucial PIN-question:
Remeber to Include letters and symbols. You don't have to stick with just numbers! Of course, if that suits your needs, you can.
After that you're set! Just go hit ⊞ Win+L to lock your computer. Test how easy it is to log back in. Now, when looking at my G-513 it has the required feature my iPhone 7, MBP and Lenovo has:
Nicely done!
Fedora 35: Name resolver fail - Solved!
Monday, April 25. 2022
Databricks CentOS 8 stream containers
Monday, February 7. 2022
Last November I created CentOS 8 -based Databricks containers.
At the time of tinkering with them, I failed to realize my base was off. I simply used the CentOS 8.4 image available at Docker Hub. On later inspection that was a failure. Even for 8.4, the image was old and was going to be EOLd soon after. Now that 31st Dec -21 had passed I couldn't get any security patches into my system. To put it midly: that's bad!
What I was supposed to be using, was the CentOS 8 stream image from quay.io. Initially my reaction was: "What's a quay.io? Why would I want to use that?"
Thanks Merriam-Webster for that, but it doesn't help.
On a closer look, it looks like all RedHat container -stuff is not at docker.io, they're in quay.io.
Simple thing: update the base image, rebuild all Databricks-images and done, right? Yup. Nope. The images built from steam didn't work anymore. Uff! They failed working that bad, not even Apache Spark driver was available. No querying driver logs for errors. A major fail, that!
Well. Seeing why driver won't work should be easy, just SSH into the driver an take a peek, right? The operation is documented by Microsoft at SSH to the cluster driver node. Well, no! According to me and couple of people asking questions like How to login SSH on Azure Databricks cluster, it is NOT possible to SSH into Azure Databricks node.
Looking at Azure Databricks architecture overview gave no clues on how to see inside of a node. I started to think nobody had ever done it. Also enabling diagnostic logging required the premium (high-prized) edition of Databricks, which wasn't available to me.
At this point I was in a full whatta-hell-is-going-on!? -mode.
Digging into documentation, I found out, it was possible to run a Cluster node initialization scripts, then I knew what to do next. As I knew it was possible to make requests into the Internet from a job running in a node, I could write an intialization script which during execution would dig me a SSH-tunnel from the node being initialized into something I would fully control. Obiviously I chose one of my own servers and from that SSH-tunneled back into the node's SSH-server. Double SSH, yes, but then I was able to get an interactive session into the well-protected node. An interactive session is what all bad people would want into any of the machines they'll crack into. Tunneling-credit to other people: quite a lot of my implementation details came from How does reverse SSH tunneling work?
To implement my plan, I crafted following cluster initialization script:
LOG_FILE="/dbfs/cluster-logs/$DB_CLUSTER_ID-init-$(date +"%F-%H:%M").log"
exec >> "$LOG_FILE"
echo "$(date +"%F %H:%M:%S") Setup SSH-tunnel"
mkdir -p /root/.ssh
cat > /root/.ssh/authorized_keys <<EOT
ecdsa-sha2-nistp521 AAAAE2V0bV+TrsFVcsA==
EOT
echo "$(date +"%F %H:%M:%S") Install and setup SSH"
dnf install openssh-server openssh-clients -y
/usr/libexec/openssh/sshd-keygen ecdsa
/usr/libexec/openssh/sshd-keygen rsa
/usr/libexec/openssh/sshd-keygen ed25519
/sbin/sshd
echo "$(date +"%F %H:%M:%S") - Add p-key"
cat > /root/.ssh/nobody_id_ecdsa <<EOT
-----BEGIN OPENSSH PRIVATE KEY-----
b3BlbnNzaC1rZXktdjEAAAAABG5vbmUAAAAEbm9uZQAAAAAAAAABAAAA
1zaGEyLW5pc3RwNTIxAAAACG5pc3RwNTIxAAAAhQQA2I7t7xx9R02QO2
rsLeYmp3X6X5qyprAGiMWM7SQrA1oFr8jae+Cqx7Fvi3xPKL/SoW1+l6
Zzc2hkQHZtNC5ocWNvZGVzaG9wLmZpAQIDBA==
-----END OPENSSH PRIVATE KEY-----
EOT
chmod go= /root/.ssh/nobody_id_ecdsa
echo "$(date +"%F %H:%M:%S") - SSH dir content:"
echo "$(date +"%F %H:%M:%S") Open SSH-tunnel"
ssh -f -N -T \
-R22222:localhost:22 \
-i /root/.ssh/nobody_id_ecdsa \
-o StrictHostKeyChecking=no \
nobody@my.own.box.example.com -p 443
Note: Above ECDSA-keys have been heavily shortened making them invalid. Don't copy passwords or keys from public Internet, generate your own secrets. Always! And if you're wondering, the original keys have been removed.
Note 2: My init-script writes log into DBFS, see exec >> "$LOG_FILE" about that.
My plan succeeded. I got in, did the snooping around and then it took couple minutes when Azure/Databrics -plumbing realized driver was dead, killed the node and retried the startup-sequence. Couple minutes was plenty of time to eyeball /databricks/spark/logs/ and /databricks/driver/logs/ and deduce what was going on and what was failing.
Looking at simplified Databricks (Apache Spark) architecture diagram:
Spark driver failed to start because it couldn't connect into cluster manager. Subsequently, cluster manager failed to start as ps-command wasn't available. It was in good old CentOS, but in base stream it was removed. As I got progress, also ip-command was needed. I added both and got the desired result: a working CentOS 8 stream Spark-cluster.
Notice how I'm specifying HTTPS-port (TCP/443) in the outgoing SSH-command (see: -p 443). In my attempts to get a session into the node, I deduced following:
As Databricks runs in it's own sandbox, also outgoing traffic is heavily firewalled. Any attempts to access SSH (TCP/22) are blocked. Both HTTP and HTTPS are known to work as exit ports, so I spoofed my SSHd there.
There are a number of different containers. To clarify which one to choose, I drew this diagram:
In my sparking, I'll need both Python and DBFS, so my choice is dbfsfuse. Most users would be happy with standard, but it only adds SSHd which is known not to work. ssh has the same exact problem. The reason for them to exist, is because in AWS SSHd does work. Among the changes from good old CentOS into stream is lacking FUSE. Old one had FUSE even in minimal, but not anymore. You can access DBFS only with dbfsfuse or standard from now on.
If you want to take my CentOS 8 brick-containers for a spin, they are still here: https://hub.docker.com/repository/docker/kingjatu/databricks, now they are maintained and get security patches too!
Last November I created CentOS 8 -based Databricks containers.
At the time of tinkering with them, I failed to realize my base was off. I simply used the CentOS 8.4 image available at Docker Hub. On later inspection that was a failure. Even for 8.4, the image was old and was going to be EOLd soon after. Now that 31st Dec -21 had passed I couldn't get any security patches into my system. To put it midly: that's bad!
What I was supposed to be using, was the CentOS 8 stream image from quay.io. Initially my reaction was: "What's a quay.io? Why would I want to use that?"
Thanks Merriam-Webster for that, but it doesn't help.
On a closer look, it looks like all RedHat container -stuff is not at docker.io, they're in quay.io.
Simple thing: update the base image, rebuild all Databricks-images and done, right? Yup. Nope. The images built from steam didn't work anymore. Uff! They failed working that bad, not even Apache Spark driver was available. No querying driver logs for errors. A major fail, that!
Well. Seeing why driver won't work should be easy, just SSH into the driver an take a peek, right? The operation is documented by Microsoft at SSH to the cluster driver node. Well, no! According to me and couple of people asking questions like How to login SSH on Azure Databricks cluster, it is NOT possible to SSH into Azure Databricks node.
Looking at Azure Databricks architecture overview gave no clues on how to see inside of a node. I started to think nobody had ever done it. Also enabling diagnostic logging required the premium (high-prized) edition of Databricks, which wasn't available to me.
At this point I was in a full whatta-hell-is-going-on!? -mode.
Digging into documentation, I found out, it was possible to run a Cluster node initialization scripts, then I knew what to do next. As I knew it was possible to make requests into the Internet from a job running in a node, I could write an intialization script which during execution would dig me a SSH-tunnel from the node being initialized into something I would fully control. Obiviously I chose one of my own servers and from that SSH-tunneled back into the node's SSH-server. Double SSH, yes, but then I was able to get an interactive session into the well-protected node. An interactive session is what all bad people would want into any of the machines they'll crack into. Tunneling-credit to other people: quite a lot of my implementation details came from How does reverse SSH tunneling work?
To implement my plan, I crafted following cluster initialization script:
LOG_FILE="/dbfs/cluster-logs/$DB_CLUSTER_ID-init-$(date +"%F-%H:%M").log"
exec >> "$LOG_FILE"
echo "$(date +"%F %H:%M:%S") Setup SSH-tunnel"
mkdir -p /root/.ssh
cat > /root/.ssh/authorized_keys <<EOT
ecdsa-sha2-nistp521 AAAAE2V0bV+TrsFVcsA==
EOT
echo "$(date +"%F %H:%M:%S") Install and setup SSH"
dnf install openssh-server openssh-clients -y
/usr/libexec/openssh/sshd-keygen ecdsa
/usr/libexec/openssh/sshd-keygen rsa
/usr/libexec/openssh/sshd-keygen ed25519
/sbin/sshd
echo "$(date +"%F %H:%M:%S") - Add p-key"
cat > /root/.ssh/nobody_id_ecdsa <<EOT
-----BEGIN OPENSSH PRIVATE KEY-----
b3BlbnNzaC1rZXktdjEAAAAABG5vbmUAAAAEbm9uZQAAAAAAAAABAAAA
1zaGEyLW5pc3RwNTIxAAAACG5pc3RwNTIxAAAAhQQA2I7t7xx9R02QO2
rsLeYmp3X6X5qyprAGiMWM7SQrA1oFr8jae+Cqx7Fvi3xPKL/SoW1+l6
Zzc2hkQHZtNC5ocWNvZGVzaG9wLmZpAQIDBA==
-----END OPENSSH PRIVATE KEY-----
EOT
chmod go= /root/.ssh/nobody_id_ecdsa
echo "$(date +"%F %H:%M:%S") - SSH dir content:"
echo "$(date +"%F %H:%M:%S") Open SSH-tunnel"
ssh -f -N -T \
-R22222:localhost:22 \
-i /root/.ssh/nobody_id_ecdsa \
-o StrictHostKeyChecking=no \
nobody@my.own.box.example.com -p 443
Note: Above ECDSA-keys have been heavily shortened making them invalid. Don't copy passwords or keys from public Internet, generate your own secrets. Always! And if you're wondering, the original keys have been removed.
Note 2: My init-script writes log into DBFS, see exec >> "$LOG_FILE" about that.
My plan succeeded. I got in, did the snooping around and then it took couple minutes when Azure/Databrics -plumbing realized driver was dead, killed the node and retried the startup-sequence. Couple minutes was plenty of time to eyeball /databricks/spark/logs/ and /databricks/driver/logs/ and deduce what was going on and what was failing.
Looking at simplified Databricks (Apache Spark) architecture diagram:
Spark driver failed to start because it couldn't connect into cluster manager. Subsequently, cluster manager failed to start as ps-command wasn't available. It was in good old CentOS, but in base stream it was removed. As I got progress, also ip-command was needed. I added both and got the desired result: a working CentOS 8 stream Spark-cluster.
Notice how I'm specifying HTTPS-port (TCP/443) in the outgoing SSH-command (see: -p 443). In my attempts to get a session into the node, I deduced following:
As Databricks runs in it's own sandbox, also outgoing traffic is heavily firewalled. Any attempts to access SSH (TCP/22) are blocked. Both HTTP and HTTPS are known to work as exit ports, so I spoofed my SSHd there.
There are a number of different containers. To clarify which one to choose, I drew this diagram:
In my sparking, I'll need both Python and DBFS, so my choice is dbfsfuse. Most users would be happy with standard, but it only adds SSHd which is known not to work. ssh has the same exact problem. The reason for them to exist, is because in AWS SSHd does work. Among the changes from good old CentOS into stream is lacking FUSE. Old one had FUSE even in minimal, but not anymore. You can access DBFS only with dbfsfuse or standard from now on.
If you want to take my CentOS 8 brick-containers for a spin, they are still here: https://hub.docker.com/repository/docker/kingjatu/databricks, now they are maintained and get security patches too!
pkexec security flaw (CVE-2021-4034)
Wednesday, January 26. 2022
Databricks CentOS 8 containers
Wednesday, November 17. 2021
MySQL Java JDBC connector TLSv1 deprecation in CentOS 8
Friday, November 12. 2021
Yeah, a mouthful. Running CentOS 8 Linux, in Java (JRE) a connection to MySQL / MariaDB there seems to be trouble. I think this is a transient issue and eventually it will resolve itself. Right now the issue is real.
Here is the long story.
I was tinkering with Databricks. The nodes for my bricks were on CentOS 8 and I was going to a MariaDB in AWS RDS. with MySQL Connector/J. As you've figured out, it didn't work! Following errors were in exception backtrace:
com.mysql.cj.jdbc.exceptions.CommunicationsException: Communications link failure
The last packet sent successfully to the server was 0 milliseconds ago. The driver has not received any packets from the server.
com.mysql.cj.jdbc.exceptions.CommunicationsException: Communications link failure
Caused by: com.mysql.cj.exceptions.CJCommunicationsException: Communications link failure
javax.net.ssl.SSLHandshakeException: No appropriate protocol (protocol is disabled or cipher suites are inappropriate)
Weird.
Going to the database with a simple CLI-command of (test run on OpenSUSE):
$ mysql -h db-instance-here.rds.amazonaws.com -P 3306 \
-u USER-HERE -p \
--ssl-ca=/var/lib/ca-certificates/ca-bundle.pem \
--ssl-verify-server-cert
... works ok.
Note: This RDS-instance enforces encrypted connection (see AWS docs for details).
Note 2: Term used by AWS is SSL. However, SSL was deprecated decades ago and the protocol used is TLS.
Taking a look on the wire:
Two details popped out instantly: TLSv1 and TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_CBC_SHA cipher. Both deprecated. Both deemed highly insecure and potentially leaking your private information.
Why would anybody using those? Don't MySQL/MariaDB/AWS -people remove insecure stuff from their software? What! Why!
Troubleshooting started. First I found SSLHandShakeException No Appropriate Protocol on Stackoverflow. It contains a hint about JVM security settings. Then MySQL documentation 6.3.2 Encrypted Connection TLS Protocols and Ciphers, where they explicitly state "As of MySQL 5.7.35, the TLSv1 and TLSv1.1 connection protocols are deprecated and support for them is subject to removal in a future MySQL version." Well, fair enough, but the bad stuff was still there in AWS RDS. I even found Changes in MySQL 5.7.35 (2021-07-20, General Availability) which clearly states TLSv1 and TLSv1.1 removal to be quite soon.
No amount of tinkering with jdk.tls.disabledAlgorithms in file /etc/java/*/security/java.security helped. I even created a simple Java-tester to make my debugging easier:
import java.sql.*;
// Code from: https://www.javatpoint.com/example-to-connect-to-the-mysql-database
// 1) Compile: javac mysql-connect-test.java
// 2) Run: CLASSPATH=.:./mysql-connector-java-8.0.27.jar java MysqlCon
class MysqlCon {
public static void main(String args[]) {
try {
Class.forName("com.mysql.cj.jdbc.Driver");
Connection con = DriverManager.getConnection("jdbc:mysql://db.amazonaws.com:3306/db", "user", "password");
Statement stmt = con.createStatement();
ResultSet rs = stmt.executeQuery("select * from emp");
while (rs.next())
System.out.println(rs.getInt(1) + " " + rs.getString(2) + " " + rs.getString(3));
con.close();
} catch (Exception e) {
System.out.println(e);
e.printStackTrace(System.out);
}
}
}
Hours passed by, but no avail. Then I found command update-crypto-policies. RedHat documentation Chapter 8. Security, 8.1. Changes in core cryptographic components, 8.1.5. TLS 1.0 and TLS 1.1 are deprecated contains mention of command:
update-crypto-policies --set LEGACY
As it does the trick, I followed up on it. In CentOS / RedHat / Fedora there is /etc/crypto-policies/back-ends/java.config. A symlink pointing to file containing:
jdk.tls.ephemeralDHKeySize=2048
jdk.certpath.disabledAlgorithms=MD2, MD5, DSA, RSA keySize < 2048
jdk.tls.disabledAlgorithms=DH keySize < 2048, TLSv1.1, TLSv1, SSLv3, SSLv2, DHE_DSS, RSA_EXPORT, DHE_DSS_EXPORT, DHE_RSA_EXPORT, DH_DSS_EXPORT, DH_RSA_EXPORT, DH_anon, ECDH_anon, DH_RSA, DH_DSS, ECDH, 3DES_EDE_CBC, DES_CBC, RC4_40, RC4_128, DES40_CBC, RC2, HmacMD5
jdk.tls.legacyAlgorithms=
That's the culprit! It turns out any changes in java.security -file won't have any effect as the policy is loaded later. Running the policy change and set it into legacy-mode has the desired effect. However, running ENTIRE system with such a bad security policy is bad. I only want to connect to RDS, why cannot I lower the security on that only? Well, that's not how Java works.
Entire troubleshooting session was way too much work. People! Get the hint already, no insecure protocols!
Yeah, a mouthful. Running CentOS 8 Linux, in Java (JRE) a connection to MySQL / MariaDB there seems to be trouble. I think this is a transient issue and eventually it will resolve itself. Right now the issue is real.
Here is the long story.
I was tinkering with Databricks. The nodes for my bricks were on CentOS 8 and I was going to a MariaDB in AWS RDS. with MySQL Connector/J. As you've figured out, it didn't work! Following errors were in exception backtrace:
com.mysql.cj.jdbc.exceptions.CommunicationsException: Communications link failure
The last packet sent successfully to the server was 0 milliseconds ago. The driver has not received any packets from the server.
com.mysql.cj.jdbc.exceptions.CommunicationsException: Communications link failure
Caused by: com.mysql.cj.exceptions.CJCommunicationsException: Communications link failure
javax.net.ssl.SSLHandshakeException: No appropriate protocol (protocol is disabled or cipher suites are inappropriate)
Weird.
Going to the database with a simple CLI-command of (test run on OpenSUSE):
$ mysql -h db-instance-here.rds.amazonaws.com -P 3306 \
-u USER-HERE -p \
--ssl-ca=/var/lib/ca-certificates/ca-bundle.pem \
--ssl-verify-server-cert
... works ok.
Note: This RDS-instance enforces encrypted connection (see AWS docs for details).
Note 2: Term used by AWS is SSL. However, SSL was deprecated decades ago and the protocol used is TLS.
Taking a look on the wire:
Two details popped out instantly: TLSv1 and TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_CBC_SHA cipher. Both deprecated. Both deemed highly insecure and potentially leaking your private information.
Why would anybody using those? Don't MySQL/MariaDB/AWS -people remove insecure stuff from their software? What! Why!
Troubleshooting started. First I found SSLHandShakeException No Appropriate Protocol on Stackoverflow. It contains a hint about JVM security settings. Then MySQL documentation 6.3.2 Encrypted Connection TLS Protocols and Ciphers, where they explicitly state "As of MySQL 5.7.35, the TLSv1 and TLSv1.1 connection protocols are deprecated and support for them is subject to removal in a future MySQL version." Well, fair enough, but the bad stuff was still there in AWS RDS. I even found Changes in MySQL 5.7.35 (2021-07-20, General Availability) which clearly states TLSv1 and TLSv1.1 removal to be quite soon.
No amount of tinkering with jdk.tls.disabledAlgorithms in file /etc/java/*/security/java.security helped. I even created a simple Java-tester to make my debugging easier:
import java.sql.*;
// Code from: https://www.javatpoint.com/example-to-connect-to-the-mysql-database
// 1) Compile: javac mysql-connect-test.java
// 2) Run: CLASSPATH=.:./mysql-connector-java-8.0.27.jar java MysqlCon
class MysqlCon {
public static void main(String args[]) {
try {
Class.forName("com.mysql.cj.jdbc.Driver");
Connection con = DriverManager.getConnection("jdbc:mysql://db.amazonaws.com:3306/db", "user", "password");
Statement stmt = con.createStatement();
ResultSet rs = stmt.executeQuery("select * from emp");
while (rs.next())
System.out.println(rs.getInt(1) + " " + rs.getString(2) + " " + rs.getString(3));
con.close();
} catch (Exception e) {
System.out.println(e);
e.printStackTrace(System.out);
}
}
}
Hours passed by, but no avail. Then I found command update-crypto-policies. RedHat documentation Chapter 8. Security, 8.1. Changes in core cryptographic components, 8.1.5. TLS 1.0 and TLS 1.1 are deprecated contains mention of command:
update-crypto-policies --set LEGACY
As it does the trick, I followed up on it. In CentOS / RedHat / Fedora there is /etc/crypto-policies/back-ends/java.config. A symlink pointing to file containing:
jdk.tls.ephemeralDHKeySize=2048
jdk.certpath.disabledAlgorithms=MD2, MD5, DSA, RSA keySize < 2048
jdk.tls.disabledAlgorithms=DH keySize < 2048, TLSv1.1, TLSv1, SSLv3, SSLv2, DHE_DSS, RSA_EXPORT, DHE_DSS_EXPORT, DHE_RSA_EXPORT, DH_DSS_EXPORT, DH_RSA_EXPORT, DH_anon, ECDH_anon, DH_RSA, DH_DSS, ECDH, 3DES_EDE_CBC, DES_CBC, RC4_40, RC4_128, DES40_CBC, RC2, HmacMD5
jdk.tls.legacyAlgorithms=
That's the culprit! It turns out any changes in java.security -file won't have any effect as the policy is loaded later. Running the policy change and set it into legacy-mode has the desired effect. However, running ENTIRE system with such a bad security policy is bad. I only want to connect to RDS, why cannot I lower the security on that only? Well, that's not how Java works.
Entire troubleshooting session was way too much work. People! Get the hint already, no insecure protocols!
macOS Monterey upgrade
Monday, November 1. 2021
macOS 12, that one I had been waiting. Reason in my case was WebAuthN. More about that is in my article about iOS 15.
The process is as you can expect. Simple.
Download is big-ish, over 12 gigabytes:
After the wait, an install will launch. At this point I'll typically quit to create the USB-stick. This way I'll avoid downloading the same thing into all of my Macs.
To create the installer, I'll erase an inserted stick with typical command of:
diskutil partitionDisk /dev/disk2 1 GPT jhfs+ "macOS Monterey" 0b
Then change into /Applications/Install macOS Monterey.app/Contents/Resources and run command:
./createinstallmedia \
--volume /Volumes/macOS\ Monterey/ \
--nointeraction
It will output the customary erasing, making bootable, copying and done as all other macOSes before this:
Erasing disk: 0%... 10%... 20%... 30%... 100%
Making disk bootable...
Copying to disk: 0%... 10%... 20%... 30%... 40%... 50%... 60%... 70%... 80%... 90%... 100%
Install media now available at "/Volumes/Install macOS Monterey"
Now stick is ready. Either boot from it, or re-run the Monterey installed from App Store.
When all the I's have been dotted and T's have been crossed, you'll be able to log into your newly upgraded macOS and verify the result:
At this point disappointment hit me. The feature I was looking for, WebAuthN or Syncing Platform Authenticator as Apple calls it wasn't available in Safari. To get it working, follow instructions in Apple Developer article Supporting Passkeys. First enable Developer-menu for your Safari (if you haven't already) and secondly, in it:
Tick the box on Enable Syncing Platform Authenticator. Done! Ready to go.
Now I went to https://webauthn.io/, registered and account with the Mac's Safari, logged in with WebAuthN to confirm it works on the Mac's Safari. Then I took my development iPhone with iOS 15.2 beta and with iOS Safari went to the same site and logged in using the same username. Not using a password! Nice.
Maybe in near future WebAuthN will be enabled by default for all of us. Now unfortunate tinkering is required. Anyway, this is a really good demo how authentication should work, cross-platform, without using any of the insecure passwords.
macOS 12, that one I had been waiting. Reason in my case was WebAuthN. More about that is in my article about iOS 15.
The process is as you can expect. Simple.
Download is big-ish, over 12 gigabytes:
After the wait, an install will launch. At this point I'll typically quit to create the USB-stick. This way I'll avoid downloading the same thing into all of my Macs.
To create the installer, I'll erase an inserted stick with typical command of:
diskutil partitionDisk /dev/disk2 1 GPT jhfs+ "macOS Monterey" 0b
Then change into /Applications/Install macOS Monterey.app/Contents/Resources and run command:
./createinstallmedia \
--volume /Volumes/macOS\ Monterey/ \
--nointeraction
It will output the customary erasing, making bootable, copying and done as all other macOSes before this:
Erasing disk: 0%... 10%... 20%... 30%... 100%
Making disk bootable...
Copying to disk: 0%... 10%... 20%... 30%... 40%... 50%... 60%... 70%... 80%... 90%... 100%
Install media now available at "/Volumes/Install macOS Monterey"
Now stick is ready. Either boot from it, or re-run the Monterey installed from App Store.
When all the I's have been dotted and T's have been crossed, you'll be able to log into your newly upgraded macOS and verify the result:
At this point disappointment hit me. The feature I was looking for, WebAuthN or Syncing Platform Authenticator as Apple calls it wasn't available in Safari. To get it working, follow instructions in Apple Developer article Supporting Passkeys. First enable Developer-menu for your Safari (if you haven't already) and secondly, in it:
Tick the box on Enable Syncing Platform Authenticator. Done! Ready to go.
Now I went to https://webauthn.io/, registered and account with the Mac's Safari, logged in with WebAuthN to confirm it works on the Mac's Safari. Then I took my development iPhone with iOS 15.2 beta and with iOS Safari went to the same site and logged in using the same username. Not using a password! Nice.
Maybe in near future WebAuthN will be enabled by default for all of us. Now unfortunate tinkering is required. Anyway, this is a really good demo how authentication should work, cross-platform, without using any of the insecure passwords.
Why Windows 11 won't be a huge success
Tuesday, October 12. 2021
Lot of controversy on Microsoft's surprise release of Windows 11. I'm not talking about when they declared Windows 10 to be the "last Windows" and then releasing 11. Also changes in GUI have lots of discussion points. Neither the forced requirement of TPM2.0 which can be lowered to TPM1.2 with a registry change is not the deal-breaker. Is somebody whispering "Vista" back there?
What really makes all the dominoes fall is the lack of CPU-support.
In above graphs is visualization of three pieces of informatinon I scraped. First I took the list of Windows 11 supported CPUs from Windows Hardware Developer - Windows Processor Requirements. Then I went for https://ark.intel.com/ to collect Intel CPU data. Also did the same for https://www.amd.com/en/products/specifications/. As for some reason AMD releases only information from 2016 onwards, for visualization I cut the Intel to match the same.
Ultimate conclusion is, Microsoft won't support all Intel CPUs released after Q2 2017. With AMD stats are even worse, threshold is somewhere around Q2 2018 and not all CPUs are supported. Percentages for AMD are better, but also their volume is smaller.
If you want to do the same, I published my source code into https://github.com/HQJaTu/Windows-CPU-support-scraper. When run, it will produce a Google Spreadsheet like this:
... which can bevisualized further to produce above graphs.
One of my laptops is a Lenovo T570 from 2017. It ticks all the Windows 11 installer boxes, except CPU-support. Obviously, CPU-support situation is likely to change on progression of time, so I may need to keep running the scripts every quarter to see if there will be better support in the later releases of Windows 11.
Lot of controversy on Microsoft's surprise release of Windows 11. I'm not talking about when they declared Windows 10 to be the "last Windows" and then releasing 11. Also changes in GUI have lots of discussion points. Neither the forced requirement of TPM2.0 which can be lowered to TPM1.2 with a registry change is not the deal-breaker. Is somebody whispering "Vista" back there?
What really makes all the dominoes fall is the lack of CPU-support.
In above graphs is visualization of three pieces of informatinon I scraped. First I took the list of Windows 11 supported CPUs from Windows Hardware Developer - Windows Processor Requirements. Then I went for https://ark.intel.com/ to collect Intel CPU data. Also did the same for https://www.amd.com/en/products/specifications/. As for some reason AMD releases only information from 2016 onwards, for visualization I cut the Intel to match the same.
Ultimate conclusion is, Microsoft won't support all Intel CPUs released after Q2 2017. With AMD stats are even worse, threshold is somewhere around Q2 2018 and not all CPUs are supported. Percentages for AMD are better, but also their volume is smaller.
If you want to do the same, I published my source code into https://github.com/HQJaTu/Windows-CPU-support-scraper. When run, it will produce a Google Spreadsheet like this:
... which can bevisualized further to produce above graphs.
One of my laptops is a Lenovo T570 from 2017. It ticks all the Windows 11 installer boxes, except CPU-support. Obviously, CPU-support situation is likely to change on progression of time, so I may need to keep running the scripts every quarter to see if there will be better support in the later releases of Windows 11.
macOS Big Sur 11.1 update fail
Monday, August 30. 2021
Big Sur was riddled with problems from getgo. It bricked some models, started installing when there was not enough disc space available and all kinds of weirness. Quite few of the minor versions had issues.
I was stuck with version 11.0.1 for over half a year. Of course my mac was hit by one of the problems, I tried navigating around the problem, contacted Apple Care (yay! finally got something ouf of that extra money) and they said a full install will be required. When doing the full install didn't work I lost motivation and just ignored any updates for months.
Going for the typical path, macOS of receving a notification about update or via App Store, they are pretty much the same thing, difference being if I actively seeked for updates or was reminded about it. Result:
Ok. Doesn't seem to work. I triied downloading on Wi-Fi, on Ethernet with couple of adapters, then I gave up and went for my favorite way of doing updates, USB-stick. Preparing the stick, booting from it, quite soon I was informed about "A software update is required to use this startup disk".
Clicking Update resulted an instant error:
Preparing something to do something didn't go as planned. Error message of "An error occurred preparing the software update" was emitted. Trying again wouldn't help. Booting into Internet recovery wasn't helpful either, error -2003F indicating failure to access resources over Internet. All avenues were explored, everything I knew was done. I totally lost motivation to attempt anything. All that time the Apple Care chat message "just do a clean reinstall" demotivated me more. I WAS TRYING TO DO A CLEAN REINSTALL!! It just didn't work.
I wasn't alone. Many many many users had exactly the same symptoms.
Months passed.
Macs are funny that way. Apple does "support" their old macOSes for security, but old hardware has a cap on what macOS will be the the last one for that particular hardware. At the same time you absolutely positively need to fall forward into latest macOS versions to have support for all nice software. My Mac wasn't capped by obsoleted hardware, it was capped by Apple's own QA failing and allowing a deploy on an OS version that wouldn't work properly. In this case, I needed to update Xcode, the must-have Mac / iOS developer tool. The version I had runing worked, but didn't support the new and shiny things I needed. I wasn't allowed to upgrade as my Big Sur version was too old.
You Maniacs! You blew it up! Ah, damn you! God damn you all to hell!
(For movie-ignorant readers, that quote is from -68 Planet of the Apes)
Need for a recent Xcode sparked my motivation. I went back to the grinding stone and trying to force my thing to update. I re-did everything I had already done before. No avail. Nothing works. Every single thing I attempted resulted in a miserable failure. To expand my understanding about the problem I read everything I could find about the subject and got hints what to try next. Apparently the problem was with the T2-chip.
For the umphteenth time I did a recovery boot and realized something I didn't recall anybody else mentioning:
Among numerous options to install or upgrade macOS I knew about, there is one additional approach in the recovery menu. And IT WORKED!
To possibly help out others still suffering from this, I left my mark into StackExchange https://apple.stackexchange.com/a/426520/251842.
Now I'm banging my head to a brick wall. Why didn't I realize that sooner!
Anyway, the Mac is updated, newer software is running. Until similar thing happens for the next time, that is.
Big Sur was riddled with problems from getgo. It bricked some models, started installing when there was not enough disc space available and all kinds of weirness. Quite few of the minor versions had issues.
I was stuck with version 11.0.1 for over half a year. Of course my mac was hit by one of the problems, I tried navigating around the problem, contacted Apple Care (yay! finally got something ouf of that extra money) and they said a full install will be required. When doing the full install didn't work I lost motivation and just ignored any updates for months.
Going for the typical path, macOS of receving a notification about update or via App Store, they are pretty much the same thing, difference being if I actively seeked for updates or was reminded about it. Result:
Ok. Doesn't seem to work. I triied downloading on Wi-Fi, on Ethernet with couple of adapters, then I gave up and went for my favorite way of doing updates, USB-stick. Preparing the stick, booting from it, quite soon I was informed about "A software update is required to use this startup disk".
Clicking Update resulted an instant error:
Preparing something to do something didn't go as planned. Error message of "An error occurred preparing the software update" was emitted. Trying again wouldn't help. Booting into Internet recovery wasn't helpful either, error -2003F indicating failure to access resources over Internet. All avenues were explored, everything I knew was done. I totally lost motivation to attempt anything. All that time the Apple Care chat message "just do a clean reinstall" demotivated me more. I WAS TRYING TO DO A CLEAN REINSTALL!! It just didn't work.
I wasn't alone. Many many many users had exactly the same symptoms.
Months passed.
Macs are funny that way. Apple does "support" their old macOSes for security, but old hardware has a cap on what macOS will be the the last one for that particular hardware. At the same time you absolutely positively need to fall forward into latest macOS versions to have support for all nice software. My Mac wasn't capped by obsoleted hardware, it was capped by Apple's own QA failing and allowing a deploy on an OS version that wouldn't work properly. In this case, I needed to update Xcode, the must-have Mac / iOS developer tool. The version I had runing worked, but didn't support the new and shiny things I needed. I wasn't allowed to upgrade as my Big Sur version was too old.
You Maniacs! You blew it up! Ah, damn you! God damn you all to hell!
(For movie-ignorant readers, that quote is from -68 Planet of the Apes)
Need for a recent Xcode sparked my motivation. I went back to the grinding stone and trying to force my thing to update. I re-did everything I had already done before. No avail. Nothing works. Every single thing I attempted resulted in a miserable failure. To expand my understanding about the problem I read everything I could find about the subject and got hints what to try next. Apparently the problem was with the T2-chip.
For the umphteenth time I did a recovery boot and realized something I didn't recall anybody else mentioning:
Among numerous options to install or upgrade macOS I knew about, there is one additional approach in the recovery menu. And IT WORKED!
To possibly help out others still suffering from this, I left my mark into StackExchange https://apple.stackexchange.com/a/426520/251842.
Now I'm banging my head to a brick wall. Why didn't I realize that sooner!
Anyway, the Mac is updated, newer software is running. Until similar thing happens for the next time, that is.
Wi-Fi 6 - Part 2 of 2: Practical wireless LAN with Linksys E8450
Sunday, August 15. 2021
There is a previous post in this series about wireless technology.
Wi-Fi 6 hardware is available, but uncommon. Since its introduction three years ago, finally it is gaining popularity. A practial example of sometimes-difficult-to-obtain part is an USB-dongle. Those have existed at least 15 years now. There simply is none with Wi-Fi 6 capability.
Additional twist is thrown at me, a person living in EU-reagion. For some weird (to me) reason, manufacturers aren't getting their radio transmitters licensed in EU. Only in US/UK. This makes Wi-Fi 6 appliance even less common here.
When I throw in my absolute non-negotiable requirement of running a reasonable firmware in my access point, I'll limit my options to almost nil. Almost! I found this in OpenWRT Table-of-Hardware: Linksys E8450 (aka. Belkin RT3200) It is an early build considered as beta, but hey! All of my requirements align there, so I went for it in Amazon UK:
Wi-Fi 6 Access Point: Belkin RT3200
Couple of days waiting for UPS delivery, and here goes:
This is exactly what I wanted and needed! A four-port gigabit switch for wired LAN, incoming Internet gigabit connector. 12 VDC / 2 A barrel connector for transformer. Given UK power plugs are from 1870s they're widely incompatible with EU-ones. Luckily manufacturers are aware of this and this box contains both UK and EU plugs in an easily interchangeable form. Thanks for that!
Notice how this is a Belkin "manufactured" unit. In reality it is a relabled Linksys RT3200. Even the OpenWRT-firmware is exactly same. Me personally, I don't care what the cardobard box says as long as my Wi-Fi is 6, is fast and is secure.
Illustrated OpenWRT Installation Guide
The thing with moving away from vendor firmware to OpenWRT is that it can be tricky. It's almost never easy, so this procedure is not for everyone.
To achieve this, there are a few steps needed. Actual documentation is at https://openwrt.org/toh/linksys/e8450, but be warned: amount of handholding there is low, for newbie there is not much details. To elaborate the process of installation, I'm walking trough what I did to get me OpenWRT running in the box.
Step 0: Preparation
You will need:
- Linksys/Belkin RT3200 access point
- Wallsocket to power the thing
- A computer with Ethernet port
- Any Windows / Mac / Linux will do, no software needs to be installed, all that is required is a working web browser
- Ethernet cable with RJ-45 connectors to access the access point's admin panel via LAN
- OpenWRT firmware from https://github.com/dangowrt/linksys-e8450-openwrt-installer
- Download files into a laptop you'll be doing your setup from
- Linksys-compatible firmware is at at:https://github.com/dangowrt/linksys-e8450-openwrt-installer/releases, get
openwrt-mediatek-mt7622-linksys_e8450-ubi-initramfs-recovery-installer.itb
- Also download optimized firmware
openwrt-mediatek-mt7622-linksys_e8450-ubi-squashfs-sysupgrade.itb
- Skills and rights to administer your workstation to have its Ethernet port a fixed IPv4-address from net 192.168.1.1/24
- Any other IPv4 address on that net will do, I used 192.168.1.10
- No DNS nor gateway will be needed for this temporary setup
Make sure not to connect the WAN / Internet into anything. The Big Net is scary and don't rush into that yet. You can do that later when all installing and setupping is done.
Mandatory caution:
If you just want to try OpenWrt and still plan to go back to the vendor firmware, use the non-UBI version of the firmware which can be flashed using the vendor's web interface.
Process described here is the UBI-version which does not allow falling back to vendor firmware.
Step 1: Un-box and replace Belkin firmware
After plugging the Access Point to a wall socket, flicking the I/O-switch on, attaching an Ethernet cable to one of the LAN-switch ports and other end directly to a laptop, going to http://192.168.1.1 with your browser will display you something like this:
What you need to do is try to exit the out-of-box-experience setup wizard:
For the "Ethernet cable is not connected" you need to click Exit. When you think of the error message bit harder, if you get the message, your Ethernet IS connected. Ok, ok. It is for the WAN Ethernet, not LAN.
Notice how setup "did not complete succesfully". That is fully intentional. Click "Do not set up". Doing that will land you on a login:
This is your unconfigured admin / admin -scenario. Log into your Linksys ... erhm. Belkin.
Select Configuration / Administration / Firmware Upgrade. Choose File. Out of the two binaries you downloaded while preparing, go for the ubi-initramfs-recovery-installer.itb. That OpenWRT firmware file isn't from manufacturer, but the file is packaged in a way which makes it compatible to allow easy installation:
On "Start Upgrade" there will be a warning. Click "Ok" and wait patiently for couple minutes.
Step 2: Upgrade your OpenWRT recovery into a real OpenWRT
When all the firmware flashing is done, your factory firmware is gone:
There is no password. Just "Login". An OpenWRT welcome screen will be shown:
Now that you're running OpenWRT, your next task is to go from recovery to real thing. I'm not sure if I'll ever want to go back, but as recommended by OpenWRT instructions, I did take backups of all four mtdblocks: bl2, fip, factory and ubi. This step is optinal:
When you're ready, go for the firmware upgrade. This time select openwrt-mediatek-mt7622-linksys_e8450-ubi-squashfs-sysupgrade.itb:
To repeat the UBI / non-UBI firmware: This is the UBI-version. It is recommended as it has better optimization for layout and management of SPI flash, but it does not allow fallbacking to vendor firmware.
I unchecked the "Keep settings and retain the current configuration" to make sure I got a fresh start with OpenWRT. On "Continue", yet another round of waiting will occur:
Step 3: Setup your wireless AP
Déjà vu!
You have seen this exact screen before. Login (there is no password yet):
Second time, same screen but with this time there is a proper firmware in the AP. Go set the admin account properly to get rid of the "There is no password set on this router" -nag. Among all settings, go to wireless configuration to verify both 2.4 and 5 GHz radios are off:
Go fix that. Select "Edit" for the 5 GHz radio and you'll be greeted by a regular wireless access point configuration dialog. It will include section about wireless security:
As I wanted to improve my WLAN security, I steer away from WPA2 and went for a WPA3-SAE security. Supporting both at the same time is possible, but securitywise it isn't wise. If your system allows wireless clients to associate with a weaker solution, they will.
Also for security, check KRACK attack countermeasures. For more details on KRACK, see: https://www.krackattacks.com/
When you've done, you should see radio enabled on a dialog like this:
Step 4: Done! Test.
That's it! Now you're running a proper firmware on our precious Wi-Fi 6 AP. But how fast it is?
As I said, I don't have many Wi-Fi 6 clients to test with. On my 1 gig fiber, iPad seems to be pretty fast. Also my Android phone speed is ... well ... acceptable.
For that speed test I didn't even go for the "one foot distance" which manufacturers love to do. As nobody uses their mobile devices right next to their AP, I tested this on a real life -scenario where both AP and I were located the way I would use Internet in my living room.
Final words
After three year wait Wi-Fi 6 is here! Improved security, improved speed, improved everything!
There is a previous post in this series about wireless technology.
Wi-Fi 6 hardware is available, but uncommon. Since its introduction three years ago, finally it is gaining popularity. A practial example of sometimes-difficult-to-obtain part is an USB-dongle. Those have existed at least 15 years now. There simply is none with Wi-Fi 6 capability.
Additional twist is thrown at me, a person living in EU-reagion. For some weird (to me) reason, manufacturers aren't getting their radio transmitters licensed in EU. Only in US/UK. This makes Wi-Fi 6 appliance even less common here.
When I throw in my absolute non-negotiable requirement of running a reasonable firmware in my access point, I'll limit my options to almost nil. Almost! I found this in OpenWRT Table-of-Hardware: Linksys E8450 (aka. Belkin RT3200) It is an early build considered as beta, but hey! All of my requirements align there, so I went for it in Amazon UK:
Wi-Fi 6 Access Point: Belkin RT3200
Couple of days waiting for UPS delivery, and here goes:
This is exactly what I wanted and needed! A four-port gigabit switch for wired LAN, incoming Internet gigabit connector. 12 VDC / 2 A barrel connector for transformer. Given UK power plugs are from 1870s they're widely incompatible with EU-ones. Luckily manufacturers are aware of this and this box contains both UK and EU plugs in an easily interchangeable form. Thanks for that!
Notice how this is a Belkin "manufactured" unit. In reality it is a relabled Linksys RT3200. Even the OpenWRT-firmware is exactly same. Me personally, I don't care what the cardobard box says as long as my Wi-Fi is 6, is fast and is secure.
Illustrated OpenWRT Installation Guide
The thing with moving away from vendor firmware to OpenWRT is that it can be tricky. It's almost never easy, so this procedure is not for everyone.
To achieve this, there are a few steps needed. Actual documentation is at https://openwrt.org/toh/linksys/e8450, but be warned: amount of handholding there is low, for newbie there is not much details. To elaborate the process of installation, I'm walking trough what I did to get me OpenWRT running in the box.
Step 0: Preparation
You will need:
- Linksys/Belkin RT3200 access point
- Wallsocket to power the thing
- A computer with Ethernet port
- Any Windows / Mac / Linux will do, no software needs to be installed, all that is required is a working web browser
- Ethernet cable with RJ-45 connectors to access the access point's admin panel via LAN
- OpenWRT firmware from https://github.com/dangowrt/linksys-e8450-openwrt-installer
- Download files into a laptop you'll be doing your setup from
- Linksys-compatible firmware is at at:https://github.com/dangowrt/linksys-e8450-openwrt-installer/releases, get
openwrt-mediatek-mt7622-linksys_e8450-ubi-initramfs-recovery-installer.itb - Also download optimized firmware
openwrt-mediatek-mt7622-linksys_e8450-ubi-squashfs-sysupgrade.itb
- Skills and rights to administer your workstation to have its Ethernet port a fixed IPv4-address from net 192.168.1.1/24
- Any other IPv4 address on that net will do, I used 192.168.1.10
- No DNS nor gateway will be needed for this temporary setup
Make sure not to connect the WAN / Internet into anything. The Big Net is scary and don't rush into that yet. You can do that later when all installing and setupping is done.
Mandatory caution:
If you just want to try OpenWrt and still plan to go back to the vendor firmware, use the non-UBI version of the firmware which can be flashed using the vendor's web interface.
Process described here is the UBI-version which does not allow falling back to vendor firmware.
Step 1: Un-box and replace Belkin firmware
After plugging the Access Point to a wall socket, flicking the I/O-switch on, attaching an Ethernet cable to one of the LAN-switch ports and other end directly to a laptop, going to http://192.168.1.1 with your browser will display you something like this:
What you need to do is try to exit the out-of-box-experience setup wizard:
For the "Ethernet cable is not connected" you need to click Exit. When you think of the error message bit harder, if you get the message, your Ethernet IS connected. Ok, ok. It is for the WAN Ethernet, not LAN.
Notice how setup "did not complete succesfully". That is fully intentional. Click "Do not set up". Doing that will land you on a login:
This is your unconfigured admin / admin -scenario. Log into your Linksys ... erhm. Belkin.
Select Configuration / Administration / Firmware Upgrade. Choose File. Out of the two binaries you downloaded while preparing, go for the ubi-initramfs-recovery-installer.itb. That OpenWRT firmware file isn't from manufacturer, but the file is packaged in a way which makes it compatible to allow easy installation:
On "Start Upgrade" there will be a warning. Click "Ok" and wait patiently for couple minutes.
Step 2: Upgrade your OpenWRT recovery into a real OpenWRT
When all the firmware flashing is done, your factory firmware is gone:
There is no password. Just "Login". An OpenWRT welcome screen will be shown:
Now that you're running OpenWRT, your next task is to go from recovery to real thing. I'm not sure if I'll ever want to go back, but as recommended by OpenWRT instructions, I did take backups of all four mtdblocks: bl2, fip, factory and ubi. This step is optinal:
When you're ready, go for the firmware upgrade. This time select openwrt-mediatek-mt7622-linksys_e8450-ubi-squashfs-sysupgrade.itb:
To repeat the UBI / non-UBI firmware: This is the UBI-version. It is recommended as it has better optimization for layout and management of SPI flash, but it does not allow fallbacking to vendor firmware.
I unchecked the "Keep settings and retain the current configuration" to make sure I got a fresh start with OpenWRT. On "Continue", yet another round of waiting will occur:
Step 3: Setup your wireless AP
Déjà vu!
You have seen this exact screen before. Login (there is no password yet):
Second time, same screen but with this time there is a proper firmware in the AP. Go set the admin account properly to get rid of the "There is no password set on this router" -nag. Among all settings, go to wireless configuration to verify both 2.4 and 5 GHz radios are off:
Go fix that. Select "Edit" for the 5 GHz radio and you'll be greeted by a regular wireless access point configuration dialog. It will include section about wireless security:
As I wanted to improve my WLAN security, I steer away from WPA2 and went for a WPA3-SAE security. Supporting both at the same time is possible, but securitywise it isn't wise. If your system allows wireless clients to associate with a weaker solution, they will.
Also for security, check KRACK attack countermeasures. For more details on KRACK, see: https://www.krackattacks.com/
When you've done, you should see radio enabled on a dialog like this:
Step 4: Done! Test.
That's it! Now you're running a proper firmware on our precious Wi-Fi 6 AP. But how fast it is?
As I said, I don't have many Wi-Fi 6 clients to test with. On my 1 gig fiber, iPad seems to be pretty fast. Also my Android phone speed is ... well ... acceptable.
For that speed test I didn't even go for the "one foot distance" which manufacturers love to do. As nobody uses their mobile devices right next to their AP, I tested this on a real life -scenario where both AP and I were located the way I would use Internet in my living room.
Final words
After three year wait Wi-Fi 6 is here! Improved security, improved speed, improved everything!
