Fedora 35: Name resolver fail - Solved!
Monday, April 25. 2022
Databricks CentOS 8 stream containers
Monday, February 7. 2022
Last November I created CentOS 8 -based Databricks containers.
At the time of tinkering with them, I failed to realize my base was off. I simply used the CentOS 8.4 image available at Docker Hub. On later inspection that was a failure. Even for 8.4, the image was old and was going to be EOLd soon after. Now that 31st Dec -21 had passed I couldn't get any security patches into my system. To put it midly: that's bad!
What I was supposed to be using, was the CentOS 8 stream image from quay.io. Initially my reaction was: "What's a quay.io? Why would I want to use that?"
Thanks Merriam-Webster for that, but it doesn't help.
On a closer look, it looks like all RedHat container -stuff is not at docker.io, they're in quay.io.
Simple thing: update the base image, rebuild all Databricks-images and done, right? Yup. Nope. The images built from steam didn't work anymore. Uff! They failed working that bad, not even Apache Spark driver was available. No querying driver logs for errors. A major fail, that!
Well. Seeing why driver won't work should be easy, just SSH into the driver an take a peek, right? The operation is documented by Microsoft at SSH to the cluster driver node. Well, no! According to me and couple of people asking questions like How to login SSH on Azure Databricks cluster, it is NOT possible to SSH into Azure Databricks node.
Looking at Azure Databricks architecture overview gave no clues on how to see inside of a node. I started to think nobody had ever done it. Also enabling diagnostic logging required the premium (high-prized) edition of Databricks, which wasn't available to me.
At this point I was in a full whatta-hell-is-going-on!? -mode.
Digging into documentation, I found out, it was possible to run a Cluster node initialization scripts, then I knew what to do next. As I knew it was possible to make requests into the Internet from a job running in a node, I could write an intialization script which during execution would dig me a SSH-tunnel from the node being initialized into something I would fully control. Obiviously I chose one of my own servers and from that SSH-tunneled back into the node's SSH-server. Double SSH, yes, but then I was able to get an interactive session into the well-protected node. An interactive session is what all bad people would want into any of the machines they'll crack into. Tunneling-credit to other people: quite a lot of my implementation details came from How does reverse SSH tunneling work?
To implement my plan, I crafted following cluster initialization script:
LOG_FILE="/dbfs/cluster-logs/$DB_CLUSTER_ID-init-$(date +"%F-%H:%M").log"
exec >> "$LOG_FILE"
echo "$(date +"%F %H:%M:%S") Setup SSH-tunnel"
mkdir -p /root/.ssh
cat > /root/.ssh/authorized_keys <<EOT
ecdsa-sha2-nistp521 AAAAE2V0bV+TrsFVcsA==
EOT
echo "$(date +"%F %H:%M:%S") Install and setup SSH"
dnf install openssh-server openssh-clients -y
/usr/libexec/openssh/sshd-keygen ecdsa
/usr/libexec/openssh/sshd-keygen rsa
/usr/libexec/openssh/sshd-keygen ed25519
/sbin/sshd
echo "$(date +"%F %H:%M:%S") - Add p-key"
cat > /root/.ssh/nobody_id_ecdsa <<EOT
-----BEGIN OPENSSH PRIVATE KEY-----
b3BlbnNzaC1rZXktdjEAAAAABG5vbmUAAAAEbm9uZQAAAAAAAAABAAAA
1zaGEyLW5pc3RwNTIxAAAACG5pc3RwNTIxAAAAhQQA2I7t7xx9R02QO2
rsLeYmp3X6X5qyprAGiMWM7SQrA1oFr8jae+Cqx7Fvi3xPKL/SoW1+l6
Zzc2hkQHZtNC5ocWNvZGVzaG9wLmZpAQIDBA==
-----END OPENSSH PRIVATE KEY-----
EOT
chmod go= /root/.ssh/nobody_id_ecdsa
echo "$(date +"%F %H:%M:%S") - SSH dir content:"
echo "$(date +"%F %H:%M:%S") Open SSH-tunnel"
ssh -f -N -T \
-R22222:localhost:22 \
-i /root/.ssh/nobody_id_ecdsa \
-o StrictHostKeyChecking=no \
nobody@my.own.box.example.com -p 443
Note: Above ECDSA-keys have been heavily shortened making them invalid. Don't copy passwords or keys from public Internet, generate your own secrets. Always! And if you're wondering, the original keys have been removed.
Note 2: My init-script writes log into DBFS, see exec >> "$LOG_FILE" about that.
My plan succeeded. I got in, did the snooping around and then it took couple minutes when Azure/Databrics -plumbing realized driver was dead, killed the node and retried the startup-sequence. Couple minutes was plenty of time to eyeball /databricks/spark/logs/ and /databricks/driver/logs/ and deduce what was going on and what was failing.
Looking at simplified Databricks (Apache Spark) architecture diagram:
Spark driver failed to start because it couldn't connect into cluster manager. Subsequently, cluster manager failed to start as ps-command wasn't available. It was in good old CentOS, but in base stream it was removed. As I got progress, also ip-command was needed. I added both and got the desired result: a working CentOS 8 stream Spark-cluster.
Notice how I'm specifying HTTPS-port (TCP/443) in the outgoing SSH-command (see: -p 443). In my attempts to get a session into the node, I deduced following:
As Databricks runs in it's own sandbox, also outgoing traffic is heavily firewalled. Any attempts to access SSH (TCP/22) are blocked. Both HTTP and HTTPS are known to work as exit ports, so I spoofed my SSHd there.
There are a number of different containers. To clarify which one to choose, I drew this diagram:
In my sparking, I'll need both Python and DBFS, so my choice is dbfsfuse. Most users would be happy with standard, but it only adds SSHd which is known not to work. ssh has the same exact problem. The reason for them to exist, is because in AWS SSHd does work. Among the changes from good old CentOS into stream is lacking FUSE. Old one had FUSE even in minimal, but not anymore. You can access DBFS only with dbfsfuse or standard from now on.
If you want to take my CentOS 8 brick-containers for a spin, they are still here: https://hub.docker.com/repository/docker/kingjatu/databricks, now they are maintained and get security patches too!
Last November I created CentOS 8 -based Databricks containers.
At the time of tinkering with them, I failed to realize my base was off. I simply used the CentOS 8.4 image available at Docker Hub. On later inspection that was a failure. Even for 8.4, the image was old and was going to be EOLd soon after. Now that 31st Dec -21 had passed I couldn't get any security patches into my system. To put it midly: that's bad!
What I was supposed to be using, was the CentOS 8 stream image from quay.io. Initially my reaction was: "What's a quay.io? Why would I want to use that?"
Thanks Merriam-Webster for that, but it doesn't help.
On a closer look, it looks like all RedHat container -stuff is not at docker.io, they're in quay.io.
Simple thing: update the base image, rebuild all Databricks-images and done, right? Yup. Nope. The images built from steam didn't work anymore. Uff! They failed working that bad, not even Apache Spark driver was available. No querying driver logs for errors. A major fail, that!
Well. Seeing why driver won't work should be easy, just SSH into the driver an take a peek, right? The operation is documented by Microsoft at SSH to the cluster driver node. Well, no! According to me and couple of people asking questions like How to login SSH on Azure Databricks cluster, it is NOT possible to SSH into Azure Databricks node.
Looking at Azure Databricks architecture overview gave no clues on how to see inside of a node. I started to think nobody had ever done it. Also enabling diagnostic logging required the premium (high-prized) edition of Databricks, which wasn't available to me.
At this point I was in a full whatta-hell-is-going-on!? -mode.
Digging into documentation, I found out, it was possible to run a Cluster node initialization scripts, then I knew what to do next. As I knew it was possible to make requests into the Internet from a job running in a node, I could write an intialization script which during execution would dig me a SSH-tunnel from the node being initialized into something I would fully control. Obiviously I chose one of my own servers and from that SSH-tunneled back into the node's SSH-server. Double SSH, yes, but then I was able to get an interactive session into the well-protected node. An interactive session is what all bad people would want into any of the machines they'll crack into. Tunneling-credit to other people: quite a lot of my implementation details came from How does reverse SSH tunneling work?
To implement my plan, I crafted following cluster initialization script:
LOG_FILE="/dbfs/cluster-logs/$DB_CLUSTER_ID-init-$(date +"%F-%H:%M").log"
exec >> "$LOG_FILE"
echo "$(date +"%F %H:%M:%S") Setup SSH-tunnel"
mkdir -p /root/.ssh
cat > /root/.ssh/authorized_keys <<EOT
ecdsa-sha2-nistp521 AAAAE2V0bV+TrsFVcsA==
EOT
echo "$(date +"%F %H:%M:%S") Install and setup SSH"
dnf install openssh-server openssh-clients -y
/usr/libexec/openssh/sshd-keygen ecdsa
/usr/libexec/openssh/sshd-keygen rsa
/usr/libexec/openssh/sshd-keygen ed25519
/sbin/sshd
echo "$(date +"%F %H:%M:%S") - Add p-key"
cat > /root/.ssh/nobody_id_ecdsa <<EOT
-----BEGIN OPENSSH PRIVATE KEY-----
b3BlbnNzaC1rZXktdjEAAAAABG5vbmUAAAAEbm9uZQAAAAAAAAABAAAA
1zaGEyLW5pc3RwNTIxAAAACG5pc3RwNTIxAAAAhQQA2I7t7xx9R02QO2
rsLeYmp3X6X5qyprAGiMWM7SQrA1oFr8jae+Cqx7Fvi3xPKL/SoW1+l6
Zzc2hkQHZtNC5ocWNvZGVzaG9wLmZpAQIDBA==
-----END OPENSSH PRIVATE KEY-----
EOT
chmod go= /root/.ssh/nobody_id_ecdsa
echo "$(date +"%F %H:%M:%S") - SSH dir content:"
echo "$(date +"%F %H:%M:%S") Open SSH-tunnel"
ssh -f -N -T \
-R22222:localhost:22 \
-i /root/.ssh/nobody_id_ecdsa \
-o StrictHostKeyChecking=no \
nobody@my.own.box.example.com -p 443
Note: Above ECDSA-keys have been heavily shortened making them invalid. Don't copy passwords or keys from public Internet, generate your own secrets. Always! And if you're wondering, the original keys have been removed.
Note 2: My init-script writes log into DBFS, see exec >> "$LOG_FILE" about that.
My plan succeeded. I got in, did the snooping around and then it took couple minutes when Azure/Databrics -plumbing realized driver was dead, killed the node and retried the startup-sequence. Couple minutes was plenty of time to eyeball /databricks/spark/logs/ and /databricks/driver/logs/ and deduce what was going on and what was failing.
Looking at simplified Databricks (Apache Spark) architecture diagram:
Spark driver failed to start because it couldn't connect into cluster manager. Subsequently, cluster manager failed to start as ps-command wasn't available. It was in good old CentOS, but in base stream it was removed. As I got progress, also ip-command was needed. I added both and got the desired result: a working CentOS 8 stream Spark-cluster.
Notice how I'm specifying HTTPS-port (TCP/443) in the outgoing SSH-command (see: -p 443). In my attempts to get a session into the node, I deduced following:
As Databricks runs in it's own sandbox, also outgoing traffic is heavily firewalled. Any attempts to access SSH (TCP/22) are blocked. Both HTTP and HTTPS are known to work as exit ports, so I spoofed my SSHd there.
There are a number of different containers. To clarify which one to choose, I drew this diagram:
In my sparking, I'll need both Python and DBFS, so my choice is dbfsfuse. Most users would be happy with standard, but it only adds SSHd which is known not to work. ssh has the same exact problem. The reason for them to exist, is because in AWS SSHd does work. Among the changes from good old CentOS into stream is lacking FUSE. Old one had FUSE even in minimal, but not anymore. You can access DBFS only with dbfsfuse or standard from now on.
If you want to take my CentOS 8 brick-containers for a spin, they are still here: https://hub.docker.com/repository/docker/kingjatu/databricks, now they are maintained and get security patches too!
pkexec security flaw (CVE-2021-4034)
Wednesday, January 26. 2022
Databricks CentOS 8 containers
Wednesday, November 17. 2021
MySQL Java JDBC connector TLSv1 deprecation in CentOS 8
Friday, November 12. 2021
Yeah, a mouthful. Running CentOS 8 Linux, in Java (JRE) a connection to MySQL / MariaDB there seems to be trouble. I think this is a transient issue and eventually it will resolve itself. Right now the issue is real.
Here is the long story.
I was tinkering with Databricks. The nodes for my bricks were on CentOS 8 and I was going to a MariaDB in AWS RDS. with MySQL Connector/J. As you've figured out, it didn't work! Following errors were in exception backtrace:
com.mysql.cj.jdbc.exceptions.CommunicationsException: Communications link failure
The last packet sent successfully to the server was 0 milliseconds ago. The driver has not received any packets from the server.
com.mysql.cj.jdbc.exceptions.CommunicationsException: Communications link failure
Caused by: com.mysql.cj.exceptions.CJCommunicationsException: Communications link failure
javax.net.ssl.SSLHandshakeException: No appropriate protocol (protocol is disabled or cipher suites are inappropriate)
Weird.
Going to the database with a simple CLI-command of (test run on OpenSUSE):
$ mysql -h db-instance-here.rds.amazonaws.com -P 3306 \
-u USER-HERE -p \
--ssl-ca=/var/lib/ca-certificates/ca-bundle.pem \
--ssl-verify-server-cert
... works ok.
Note: This RDS-instance enforces encrypted connection (see AWS docs for details).
Note 2: Term used by AWS is SSL. However, SSL was deprecated decades ago and the protocol used is TLS.
Taking a look on the wire:
Two details popped out instantly: TLSv1 and TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_CBC_SHA cipher. Both deprecated. Both deemed highly insecure and potentially leaking your private information.
Why would anybody using those? Don't MySQL/MariaDB/AWS -people remove insecure stuff from their software? What! Why!
Troubleshooting started. First I found SSLHandShakeException No Appropriate Protocol on Stackoverflow. It contains a hint about JVM security settings. Then MySQL documentation 6.3.2 Encrypted Connection TLS Protocols and Ciphers, where they explicitly state "As of MySQL 5.7.35, the TLSv1 and TLSv1.1 connection protocols are deprecated and support for them is subject to removal in a future MySQL version." Well, fair enough, but the bad stuff was still there in AWS RDS. I even found Changes in MySQL 5.7.35 (2021-07-20, General Availability) which clearly states TLSv1 and TLSv1.1 removal to be quite soon.
No amount of tinkering with jdk.tls.disabledAlgorithms in file /etc/java/*/security/java.security helped. I even created a simple Java-tester to make my debugging easier:
import java.sql.*;
// Code from: https://www.javatpoint.com/example-to-connect-to-the-mysql-database
// 1) Compile: javac mysql-connect-test.java
// 2) Run: CLASSPATH=.:./mysql-connector-java-8.0.27.jar java MysqlCon
class MysqlCon {
public static void main(String args[]) {
try {
Class.forName("com.mysql.cj.jdbc.Driver");
Connection con = DriverManager.getConnection("jdbc:mysql://db.amazonaws.com:3306/db", "user", "password");
Statement stmt = con.createStatement();
ResultSet rs = stmt.executeQuery("select * from emp");
while (rs.next())
System.out.println(rs.getInt(1) + " " + rs.getString(2) + " " + rs.getString(3));
con.close();
} catch (Exception e) {
System.out.println(e);
e.printStackTrace(System.out);
}
}
}
Hours passed by, but no avail. Then I found command update-crypto-policies. RedHat documentation Chapter 8. Security, 8.1. Changes in core cryptographic components, 8.1.5. TLS 1.0 and TLS 1.1 are deprecated contains mention of command:
update-crypto-policies --set LEGACY
As it does the trick, I followed up on it. In CentOS / RedHat / Fedora there is /etc/crypto-policies/back-ends/java.config. A symlink pointing to file containing:
jdk.tls.ephemeralDHKeySize=2048
jdk.certpath.disabledAlgorithms=MD2, MD5, DSA, RSA keySize < 2048
jdk.tls.disabledAlgorithms=DH keySize < 2048, TLSv1.1, TLSv1, SSLv3, SSLv2, DHE_DSS, RSA_EXPORT, DHE_DSS_EXPORT, DHE_RSA_EXPORT, DH_DSS_EXPORT, DH_RSA_EXPORT, DH_anon, ECDH_anon, DH_RSA, DH_DSS, ECDH, 3DES_EDE_CBC, DES_CBC, RC4_40, RC4_128, DES40_CBC, RC2, HmacMD5
jdk.tls.legacyAlgorithms=
That's the culprit! It turns out any changes in java.security -file won't have any effect as the policy is loaded later. Running the policy change and set it into legacy-mode has the desired effect. However, running ENTIRE system with such a bad security policy is bad. I only want to connect to RDS, why cannot I lower the security on that only? Well, that's not how Java works.
Entire troubleshooting session was way too much work. People! Get the hint already, no insecure protocols!
Yeah, a mouthful. Running CentOS 8 Linux, in Java (JRE) a connection to MySQL / MariaDB there seems to be trouble. I think this is a transient issue and eventually it will resolve itself. Right now the issue is real.
Here is the long story.
I was tinkering with Databricks. The nodes for my bricks were on CentOS 8 and I was going to a MariaDB in AWS RDS. with MySQL Connector/J. As you've figured out, it didn't work! Following errors were in exception backtrace:
com.mysql.cj.jdbc.exceptions.CommunicationsException: Communications link failure
The last packet sent successfully to the server was 0 milliseconds ago. The driver has not received any packets from the server.
com.mysql.cj.jdbc.exceptions.CommunicationsException: Communications link failure
Caused by: com.mysql.cj.exceptions.CJCommunicationsException: Communications link failure
javax.net.ssl.SSLHandshakeException: No appropriate protocol (protocol is disabled or cipher suites are inappropriate)
Weird.
Going to the database with a simple CLI-command of (test run on OpenSUSE):
$ mysql -h db-instance-here.rds.amazonaws.com -P 3306 \
-u USER-HERE -p \
--ssl-ca=/var/lib/ca-certificates/ca-bundle.pem \
--ssl-verify-server-cert
... works ok.
Note: This RDS-instance enforces encrypted connection (see AWS docs for details).
Note 2: Term used by AWS is SSL. However, SSL was deprecated decades ago and the protocol used is TLS.
Taking a look on the wire:
Two details popped out instantly: TLSv1 and TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_CBC_SHA cipher. Both deprecated. Both deemed highly insecure and potentially leaking your private information.
Why would anybody using those? Don't MySQL/MariaDB/AWS -people remove insecure stuff from their software? What! Why!
Troubleshooting started. First I found SSLHandShakeException No Appropriate Protocol on Stackoverflow. It contains a hint about JVM security settings. Then MySQL documentation 6.3.2 Encrypted Connection TLS Protocols and Ciphers, where they explicitly state "As of MySQL 5.7.35, the TLSv1 and TLSv1.1 connection protocols are deprecated and support for them is subject to removal in a future MySQL version." Well, fair enough, but the bad stuff was still there in AWS RDS. I even found Changes in MySQL 5.7.35 (2021-07-20, General Availability) which clearly states TLSv1 and TLSv1.1 removal to be quite soon.
No amount of tinkering with jdk.tls.disabledAlgorithms in file /etc/java/*/security/java.security helped. I even created a simple Java-tester to make my debugging easier:
import java.sql.*;
// Code from: https://www.javatpoint.com/example-to-connect-to-the-mysql-database
// 1) Compile: javac mysql-connect-test.java
// 2) Run: CLASSPATH=.:./mysql-connector-java-8.0.27.jar java MysqlCon
class MysqlCon {
public static void main(String args[]) {
try {
Class.forName("com.mysql.cj.jdbc.Driver");
Connection con = DriverManager.getConnection("jdbc:mysql://db.amazonaws.com:3306/db", "user", "password");
Statement stmt = con.createStatement();
ResultSet rs = stmt.executeQuery("select * from emp");
while (rs.next())
System.out.println(rs.getInt(1) + " " + rs.getString(2) + " " + rs.getString(3));
con.close();
} catch (Exception e) {
System.out.println(e);
e.printStackTrace(System.out);
}
}
}
Hours passed by, but no avail. Then I found command update-crypto-policies. RedHat documentation Chapter 8. Security, 8.1. Changes in core cryptographic components, 8.1.5. TLS 1.0 and TLS 1.1 are deprecated contains mention of command:
update-crypto-policies --set LEGACY
As it does the trick, I followed up on it. In CentOS / RedHat / Fedora there is /etc/crypto-policies/back-ends/java.config. A symlink pointing to file containing:
jdk.tls.ephemeralDHKeySize=2048
jdk.certpath.disabledAlgorithms=MD2, MD5, DSA, RSA keySize < 2048
jdk.tls.disabledAlgorithms=DH keySize < 2048, TLSv1.1, TLSv1, SSLv3, SSLv2, DHE_DSS, RSA_EXPORT, DHE_DSS_EXPORT, DHE_RSA_EXPORT, DH_DSS_EXPORT, DH_RSA_EXPORT, DH_anon, ECDH_anon, DH_RSA, DH_DSS, ECDH, 3DES_EDE_CBC, DES_CBC, RC4_40, RC4_128, DES40_CBC, RC2, HmacMD5
jdk.tls.legacyAlgorithms=
That's the culprit! It turns out any changes in java.security -file won't have any effect as the policy is loaded later. Running the policy change and set it into legacy-mode has the desired effect. However, running ENTIRE system with such a bad security policy is bad. I only want to connect to RDS, why cannot I lower the security on that only? Well, that's not how Java works.
Entire troubleshooting session was way too much work. People! Get the hint already, no insecure protocols!
macOS Monterey upgrade
Monday, November 1. 2021
macOS 12, that one I had been waiting. Reason in my case was WebAuthN. More about that is in my article about iOS 15.
The process is as you can expect. Simple.
Download is big-ish, over 12 gigabytes:
After the wait, an install will launch. At this point I'll typically quit to create the USB-stick. This way I'll avoid downloading the same thing into all of my Macs.
To create the installer, I'll erase an inserted stick with typical command of:
diskutil partitionDisk /dev/disk2 1 GPT jhfs+ "macOS Monterey" 0b
Then change into /Applications/Install macOS Monterey.app/Contents/Resources and run command:
./createinstallmedia \
--volume /Volumes/macOS\ Monterey/ \
--nointeraction
It will output the customary erasing, making bootable, copying and done as all other macOSes before this:
Erasing disk: 0%... 10%... 20%... 30%... 100%
Making disk bootable...
Copying to disk: 0%... 10%... 20%... 30%... 40%... 50%... 60%... 70%... 80%... 90%... 100%
Install media now available at "/Volumes/Install macOS Monterey"
Now stick is ready. Either boot from it, or re-run the Monterey installed from App Store.
When all the I's have been dotted and T's have been crossed, you'll be able to log into your newly upgraded macOS and verify the result:
At this point disappointment hit me. The feature I was looking for, WebAuthN or Syncing Platform Authenticator as Apple calls it wasn't available in Safari. To get it working, follow instructions in Apple Developer article Supporting Passkeys. First enable Developer-menu for your Safari (if you haven't already) and secondly, in it:
Tick the box on Enable Syncing Platform Authenticator. Done! Ready to go.
Now I went to https://webauthn.io/, registered and account with the Mac's Safari, logged in with WebAuthN to confirm it works on the Mac's Safari. Then I took my development iPhone with iOS 15.2 beta and with iOS Safari went to the same site and logged in using the same username. Not using a password! Nice. 
Maybe in near future WebAuthN will be enabled by default for all of us. Now unfortunate tinkering is required. Anyway, this is a really good demo how authentication should work, cross-platform, without using any of the insecure passwords.
macOS 12, that one I had been waiting. Reason in my case was WebAuthN. More about that is in my article about iOS 15.
The process is as you can expect. Simple.
Download is big-ish, over 12 gigabytes:
After the wait, an install will launch. At this point I'll typically quit to create the USB-stick. This way I'll avoid downloading the same thing into all of my Macs.
To create the installer, I'll erase an inserted stick with typical command of:
diskutil partitionDisk /dev/disk2 1 GPT jhfs+ "macOS Monterey" 0b
Then change into /Applications/Install macOS Monterey.app/Contents/Resources and run command:
./createinstallmedia \
--volume /Volumes/macOS\ Monterey/ \
--nointeraction
It will output the customary erasing, making bootable, copying and done as all other macOSes before this:
Erasing disk: 0%... 10%... 20%... 30%... 100%
Making disk bootable...
Copying to disk: 0%... 10%... 20%... 30%... 40%... 50%... 60%... 70%... 80%... 90%... 100%
Install media now available at "/Volumes/Install macOS Monterey"
Now stick is ready. Either boot from it, or re-run the Monterey installed from App Store.
When all the I's have been dotted and T's have been crossed, you'll be able to log into your newly upgraded macOS and verify the result:
At this point disappointment hit me. The feature I was looking for, WebAuthN or Syncing Platform Authenticator as Apple calls it wasn't available in Safari. To get it working, follow instructions in Apple Developer article Supporting Passkeys. First enable Developer-menu for your Safari (if you haven't already) and secondly, in it:
Tick the box on Enable Syncing Platform Authenticator. Done! Ready to go.
Now I went to https://webauthn.io/, registered and account with the Mac's Safari, logged in with WebAuthN to confirm it works on the Mac's Safari. Then I took my development iPhone with iOS 15.2 beta and with iOS Safari went to the same site and logged in using the same username. Not using a password! Nice.
Maybe in near future WebAuthN will be enabled by default for all of us. Now unfortunate tinkering is required. Anyway, this is a really good demo how authentication should work, cross-platform, without using any of the insecure passwords.
Why Windows 11 won't be a huge success
Tuesday, October 12. 2021
Lot of controversy on Microsoft's surprise release of Windows 11. I'm not talking about when they declared Windows 10 to be the "last Windows" and then releasing 11. Also changes in GUI have lots of discussion points. Neither the forced requirement of TPM2.0 which can be lowered to TPM1.2 with a registry change is not the deal-breaker. Is somebody whispering "Vista" back there?
What really makes all the dominoes fall is the lack of CPU-support.
In above graphs is visualization of three pieces of informatinon I scraped. First I took the list of Windows 11 supported CPUs from Windows Hardware Developer - Windows Processor Requirements. Then I went for https://ark.intel.com/ to collect Intel CPU data. Also did the same for https://www.amd.com/en/products/specifications/. As for some reason AMD releases only information from 2016 onwards, for visualization I cut the Intel to match the same.
Ultimate conclusion is, Microsoft won't support all Intel CPUs released after Q2 2017. With AMD stats are even worse, threshold is somewhere around Q2 2018 and not all CPUs are supported. Percentages for AMD are better, but also their volume is smaller.
If you want to do the same, I published my source code into https://github.com/HQJaTu/Windows-CPU-support-scraper. When run, it will produce a Google Spreadsheet like this:
... which can bevisualized further to produce above graphs.
One of my laptops is a Lenovo T570 from 2017. It ticks all the Windows 11 installer boxes, except CPU-support. Obviously, CPU-support situation is likely to change on progression of time, so I may need to keep running the scripts every quarter to see if there will be better support in the later releases of Windows 11.
Lot of controversy on Microsoft's surprise release of Windows 11. I'm not talking about when they declared Windows 10 to be the "last Windows" and then releasing 11. Also changes in GUI have lots of discussion points. Neither the forced requirement of TPM2.0 which can be lowered to TPM1.2 with a registry change is not the deal-breaker. Is somebody whispering "Vista" back there?
What really makes all the dominoes fall is the lack of CPU-support.
In above graphs is visualization of three pieces of informatinon I scraped. First I took the list of Windows 11 supported CPUs from Windows Hardware Developer - Windows Processor Requirements. Then I went for https://ark.intel.com/ to collect Intel CPU data. Also did the same for https://www.amd.com/en/products/specifications/. As for some reason AMD releases only information from 2016 onwards, for visualization I cut the Intel to match the same.
Ultimate conclusion is, Microsoft won't support all Intel CPUs released after Q2 2017. With AMD stats are even worse, threshold is somewhere around Q2 2018 and not all CPUs are supported. Percentages for AMD are better, but also their volume is smaller.
If you want to do the same, I published my source code into https://github.com/HQJaTu/Windows-CPU-support-scraper. When run, it will produce a Google Spreadsheet like this:
... which can bevisualized further to produce above graphs.
One of my laptops is a Lenovo T570 from 2017. It ticks all the Windows 11 installer boxes, except CPU-support. Obviously, CPU-support situation is likely to change on progression of time, so I may need to keep running the scripts every quarter to see if there will be better support in the later releases of Windows 11.
macOS Big Sur 11.1 update fail
Monday, August 30. 2021
Big Sur was riddled with problems from getgo. It bricked some models, started installing when there was not enough disc space available and all kinds of weirness. Quite few of the minor versions had issues.
I was stuck with version 11.0.1 for over half a year. Of course my mac was hit by one of the problems, I tried navigating around the problem, contacted Apple Care (yay! finally got something ouf of that extra money) and they said a full install will be required. When doing the full install didn't work I lost motivation and just ignored any updates for months.
Going for the typical path, macOS of receving a notification about update or via App Store, they are pretty much the same thing, difference being if I actively seeked for updates or was reminded about it. Result:
Ok. Doesn't seem to work. I triied downloading on Wi-Fi, on Ethernet with couple of adapters, then I gave up and went for my favorite way of doing updates, USB-stick. Preparing the stick, booting from it, quite soon I was informed about "A software update is required to use this startup disk".
Clicking Update resulted an instant error:
Preparing something to do something didn't go as planned. Error message of "An error occurred preparing the software update" was emitted. Trying again wouldn't help. Booting into Internet recovery wasn't helpful either, error -2003F indicating failure to access resources over Internet. All avenues were explored, everything I knew was done. I totally lost motivation to attempt anything. All that time the Apple Care chat message "just do a clean reinstall" demotivated me more. I WAS TRYING TO DO A CLEAN REINSTALL!! It just didn't work.
I wasn't alone. Many many many users had exactly the same symptoms.
Months passed.
Macs are funny that way. Apple does "support" their old macOSes for security, but old hardware has a cap on what macOS will be the the last one for that particular hardware. At the same time you absolutely positively need to fall forward into latest macOS versions to have support for all nice software. My Mac wasn't capped by obsoleted hardware, it was capped by Apple's own QA failing and allowing a deploy on an OS version that wouldn't work properly. In this case, I needed to update Xcode, the must-have Mac / iOS developer tool. The version I had runing worked, but didn't support the new and shiny things I needed. I wasn't allowed to upgrade as my Big Sur version was too old.
You Maniacs! You blew it up! Ah, damn you! God damn you all to hell!
(For movie-ignorant readers, that quote is from -68 Planet of the Apes)
Need for a recent Xcode sparked my motivation. I went back to the grinding stone and trying to force my thing to update. I re-did everything I had already done before. No avail. Nothing works. Every single thing I attempted resulted in a miserable failure. To expand my understanding about the problem I read everything I could find about the subject and got hints what to try next. Apparently the problem was with the T2-chip.
For the umphteenth time I did a recovery boot and realized something I didn't recall anybody else mentioning:
Among numerous options to install or upgrade macOS I knew about, there is one additional approach in the recovery menu. And IT WORKED!
To possibly help out others still suffering from this, I left my mark into StackExchange https://apple.stackexchange.com/a/426520/251842.
Now I'm banging my head to a brick wall. Why didn't I realize that sooner!
Anyway, the Mac is updated, newer software is running. Until similar thing happens for the next time, that is.
Big Sur was riddled with problems from getgo. It bricked some models, started installing when there was not enough disc space available and all kinds of weirness. Quite few of the minor versions had issues.
I was stuck with version 11.0.1 for over half a year. Of course my mac was hit by one of the problems, I tried navigating around the problem, contacted Apple Care (yay! finally got something ouf of that extra money) and they said a full install will be required. When doing the full install didn't work I lost motivation and just ignored any updates for months.
Going for the typical path, macOS of receving a notification about update or via App Store, they are pretty much the same thing, difference being if I actively seeked for updates or was reminded about it. Result:
Ok. Doesn't seem to work. I triied downloading on Wi-Fi, on Ethernet with couple of adapters, then I gave up and went for my favorite way of doing updates, USB-stick. Preparing the stick, booting from it, quite soon I was informed about "A software update is required to use this startup disk".
Clicking Update resulted an instant error:
Preparing something to do something didn't go as planned. Error message of "An error occurred preparing the software update" was emitted. Trying again wouldn't help. Booting into Internet recovery wasn't helpful either, error -2003F indicating failure to access resources over Internet. All avenues were explored, everything I knew was done. I totally lost motivation to attempt anything. All that time the Apple Care chat message "just do a clean reinstall" demotivated me more. I WAS TRYING TO DO A CLEAN REINSTALL!! It just didn't work.
I wasn't alone. Many many many users had exactly the same symptoms.
Months passed.
Macs are funny that way. Apple does "support" their old macOSes for security, but old hardware has a cap on what macOS will be the the last one for that particular hardware. At the same time you absolutely positively need to fall forward into latest macOS versions to have support for all nice software. My Mac wasn't capped by obsoleted hardware, it was capped by Apple's own QA failing and allowing a deploy on an OS version that wouldn't work properly. In this case, I needed to update Xcode, the must-have Mac / iOS developer tool. The version I had runing worked, but didn't support the new and shiny things I needed. I wasn't allowed to upgrade as my Big Sur version was too old.
You Maniacs! You blew it up! Ah, damn you! God damn you all to hell!
(For movie-ignorant readers, that quote is from -68 Planet of the Apes)
Need for a recent Xcode sparked my motivation. I went back to the grinding stone and trying to force my thing to update. I re-did everything I had already done before. No avail. Nothing works. Every single thing I attempted resulted in a miserable failure. To expand my understanding about the problem I read everything I could find about the subject and got hints what to try next. Apparently the problem was with the T2-chip.
For the umphteenth time I did a recovery boot and realized something I didn't recall anybody else mentioning:
Among numerous options to install or upgrade macOS I knew about, there is one additional approach in the recovery menu. And IT WORKED!
To possibly help out others still suffering from this, I left my mark into StackExchange https://apple.stackexchange.com/a/426520/251842.
Now I'm banging my head to a brick wall. Why didn't I realize that sooner!
Anyway, the Mac is updated, newer software is running. Until similar thing happens for the next time, that is.
Wi-Fi 6 - Part 2 of 2: Practical wireless LAN with Linksys E8450
Sunday, August 15. 2021
There is a previous post in this series about wireless technology.
Wi-Fi 6 hardware is available, but uncommon. Since its introduction three years ago, finally it is gaining popularity. A practial example of sometimes-difficult-to-obtain part is an USB-dongle. Those have existed at least 15 years now. There simply is none with Wi-Fi 6 capability.
Additional twist is thrown at me, a person living in EU-reagion. For some weird (to me) reason, manufacturers aren't getting their radio transmitters licensed in EU. Only in US/UK. This makes Wi-Fi 6 appliance even less common here.
When I throw in my absolute non-negotiable requirement of running a reasonable firmware in my access point, I'll limit my options to almost nil. Almost! I found this in OpenWRT Table-of-Hardware: Linksys E8450 (aka. Belkin RT3200) It is an early build considered as beta, but hey! All of my requirements align there, so I went for it in Amazon UK:
Wi-Fi 6 Access Point: Belkin RT3200
Couple of days waiting for UPS delivery, and here goes:
This is exactly what I wanted and needed! A four-port gigabit switch for wired LAN, incoming Internet gigabit connector. 12 VDC / 2 A barrel connector for transformer. Given UK power plugs are from 1870s they're widely incompatible with EU-ones. Luckily manufacturers are aware of this and this box contains both UK and EU plugs in an easily interchangeable form. Thanks for that!
Notice how this is a Belkin "manufactured" unit. In reality it is a relabled Linksys RT3200. Even the OpenWRT-firmware is exactly same. Me personally, I don't care what the cardobard box says as long as my Wi-Fi is 6, is fast and is secure.
Illustrated OpenWRT Installation Guide
The thing with moving away from vendor firmware to OpenWRT is that it can be tricky. It's almost never easy, so this procedure is not for everyone.
To achieve this, there are a few steps needed. Actual documentation is at https://openwrt.org/toh/linksys/e8450, but be warned: amount of handholding there is low, for newbie there is not much details. To elaborate the process of installation, I'm walking trough what I did to get me OpenWRT running in the box.
Step 0: Preparation
You will need:
- Linksys/Belkin RT3200 access point
- Wallsocket to power the thing
- A computer with Ethernet port
- Any Windows / Mac / Linux will do, no software needs to be installed, all that is required is a working web browser
- Ethernet cable with RJ-45 connectors to access the access point's admin panel via LAN
- OpenWRT firmware from https://github.com/dangowrt/linksys-e8450-openwrt-installer
- Download files into a laptop you'll be doing your setup from
- Linksys-compatible firmware is at at:https://github.com/dangowrt/linksys-e8450-openwrt-installer/releases, get
openwrt-mediatek-mt7622-linksys_e8450-ubi-initramfs-recovery-installer.itb
- Also download optimized firmware
openwrt-mediatek-mt7622-linksys_e8450-ubi-squashfs-sysupgrade.itb
- Skills and rights to administer your workstation to have its Ethernet port a fixed IPv4-address from net 192.168.1.1/24
- Any other IPv4 address on that net will do, I used 192.168.1.10
- No DNS nor gateway will be needed for this temporary setup
Make sure not to connect the WAN / Internet into anything. The Big Net is scary and don't rush into that yet. You can do that later when all installing and setupping is done.
Mandatory caution:
If you just want to try OpenWrt and still plan to go back to the vendor firmware, use the non-UBI version of the firmware which can be flashed using the vendor's web interface.
Process described here is the UBI-version which does not allow falling back to vendor firmware.
Step 1: Un-box and replace Belkin firmware
After plugging the Access Point to a wall socket, flicking the I/O-switch on, attaching an Ethernet cable to one of the LAN-switch ports and other end directly to a laptop, going to http://192.168.1.1 with your browser will display you something like this:
What you need to do is try to exit the out-of-box-experience setup wizard:
For the "Ethernet cable is not connected" you need to click Exit. When you think of the error message bit harder, if you get the message, your Ethernet IS connected. Ok, ok. It is for the WAN Ethernet, not LAN.
Notice how setup "did not complete succesfully". That is fully intentional. Click "Do not set up". Doing that will land you on a login:
This is your unconfigured admin / admin -scenario. Log into your Linksys ... erhm. Belkin.
Select Configuration / Administration / Firmware Upgrade. Choose File. Out of the two binaries you downloaded while preparing, go for the ubi-initramfs-recovery-installer.itb. That OpenWRT firmware file isn't from manufacturer, but the file is packaged in a way which makes it compatible to allow easy installation:
On "Start Upgrade" there will be a warning. Click "Ok" and wait patiently for couple minutes.
Step 2: Upgrade your OpenWRT recovery into a real OpenWRT
When all the firmware flashing is done, your factory firmware is gone:
There is no password. Just "Login". An OpenWRT welcome screen will be shown:
Now that you're running OpenWRT, your next task is to go from recovery to real thing. I'm not sure if I'll ever want to go back, but as recommended by OpenWRT instructions, I did take backups of all four mtdblocks: bl2, fip, factory and ubi. This step is optinal:
When you're ready, go for the firmware upgrade. This time select openwrt-mediatek-mt7622-linksys_e8450-ubi-squashfs-sysupgrade.itb:
To repeat the UBI / non-UBI firmware: This is the UBI-version. It is recommended as it has better optimization for layout and management of SPI flash, but it does not allow fallbacking to vendor firmware.
I unchecked the "Keep settings and retain the current configuration" to make sure I got a fresh start with OpenWRT. On "Continue", yet another round of waiting will occur:
Step 3: Setup your wireless AP
Déjà vu!
You have seen this exact screen before. Login (there is no password yet):
Second time, same screen but with this time there is a proper firmware in the AP. Go set the admin account properly to get rid of the "There is no password set on this router" -nag. Among all settings, go to wireless configuration to verify both 2.4 and 5 GHz radios are off:
Go fix that. Select "Edit" for the 5 GHz radio and you'll be greeted by a regular wireless access point configuration dialog. It will include section about wireless security:
As I wanted to improve my WLAN security, I steer away from WPA2 and went for a WPA3-SAE security. Supporting both at the same time is possible, but securitywise it isn't wise. If your system allows wireless clients to associate with a weaker solution, they will.
Also for security, check KRACK attack countermeasures. For more details on KRACK, see: https://www.krackattacks.com/
When you've done, you should see radio enabled on a dialog like this:
Step 4: Done! Test.
That's it! Now you're running a proper firmware on our precious Wi-Fi 6 AP. But how fast it is?
As I said, I don't have many Wi-Fi 6 clients to test with. On my 1 gig fiber, iPad seems to be pretty fast. Also my Android phone speed is ... well ... acceptable.
For that speed test I didn't even go for the "one foot distance" which manufacturers love to do. As nobody uses their mobile devices right next to their AP, I tested this on a real life -scenario where both AP and I were located the way I would use Internet in my living room.
Final words
After three year wait Wi-Fi 6 is here! Improved security, improved speed, improved everything!
There is a previous post in this series about wireless technology.
Wi-Fi 6 hardware is available, but uncommon. Since its introduction three years ago, finally it is gaining popularity. A practial example of sometimes-difficult-to-obtain part is an USB-dongle. Those have existed at least 15 years now. There simply is none with Wi-Fi 6 capability.
Additional twist is thrown at me, a person living in EU-reagion. For some weird (to me) reason, manufacturers aren't getting their radio transmitters licensed in EU. Only in US/UK. This makes Wi-Fi 6 appliance even less common here.
When I throw in my absolute non-negotiable requirement of running a reasonable firmware in my access point, I'll limit my options to almost nil. Almost! I found this in OpenWRT Table-of-Hardware: Linksys E8450 (aka. Belkin RT3200) It is an early build considered as beta, but hey! All of my requirements align there, so I went for it in Amazon UK:
Wi-Fi 6 Access Point: Belkin RT3200
Couple of days waiting for UPS delivery, and here goes:
This is exactly what I wanted and needed! A four-port gigabit switch for wired LAN, incoming Internet gigabit connector. 12 VDC / 2 A barrel connector for transformer. Given UK power plugs are from 1870s they're widely incompatible with EU-ones. Luckily manufacturers are aware of this and this box contains both UK and EU plugs in an easily interchangeable form. Thanks for that!
Notice how this is a Belkin "manufactured" unit. In reality it is a relabled Linksys RT3200. Even the OpenWRT-firmware is exactly same. Me personally, I don't care what the cardobard box says as long as my Wi-Fi is 6, is fast and is secure.
Illustrated OpenWRT Installation Guide
The thing with moving away from vendor firmware to OpenWRT is that it can be tricky. It's almost never easy, so this procedure is not for everyone.
To achieve this, there are a few steps needed. Actual documentation is at https://openwrt.org/toh/linksys/e8450, but be warned: amount of handholding there is low, for newbie there is not much details. To elaborate the process of installation, I'm walking trough what I did to get me OpenWRT running in the box.
Step 0: Preparation
You will need:
- Linksys/Belkin RT3200 access point
- Wallsocket to power the thing
- A computer with Ethernet port
- Any Windows / Mac / Linux will do, no software needs to be installed, all that is required is a working web browser
- Ethernet cable with RJ-45 connectors to access the access point's admin panel via LAN
- OpenWRT firmware from https://github.com/dangowrt/linksys-e8450-openwrt-installer
- Download files into a laptop you'll be doing your setup from
- Linksys-compatible firmware is at at:https://github.com/dangowrt/linksys-e8450-openwrt-installer/releases, get
openwrt-mediatek-mt7622-linksys_e8450-ubi-initramfs-recovery-installer.itb - Also download optimized firmware
openwrt-mediatek-mt7622-linksys_e8450-ubi-squashfs-sysupgrade.itb
- Skills and rights to administer your workstation to have its Ethernet port a fixed IPv4-address from net 192.168.1.1/24
- Any other IPv4 address on that net will do, I used 192.168.1.10
- No DNS nor gateway will be needed for this temporary setup
Make sure not to connect the WAN / Internet into anything. The Big Net is scary and don't rush into that yet. You can do that later when all installing and setupping is done.
Mandatory caution:
If you just want to try OpenWrt and still plan to go back to the vendor firmware, use the non-UBI version of the firmware which can be flashed using the vendor's web interface.
Process described here is the UBI-version which does not allow falling back to vendor firmware.
Step 1: Un-box and replace Belkin firmware
After plugging the Access Point to a wall socket, flicking the I/O-switch on, attaching an Ethernet cable to one of the LAN-switch ports and other end directly to a laptop, going to http://192.168.1.1 with your browser will display you something like this:
What you need to do is try to exit the out-of-box-experience setup wizard:
For the "Ethernet cable is not connected" you need to click Exit. When you think of the error message bit harder, if you get the message, your Ethernet IS connected. Ok, ok. It is for the WAN Ethernet, not LAN.
Notice how setup "did not complete succesfully". That is fully intentional. Click "Do not set up". Doing that will land you on a login:
This is your unconfigured admin / admin -scenario. Log into your Linksys ... erhm. Belkin.
Select Configuration / Administration / Firmware Upgrade. Choose File. Out of the two binaries you downloaded while preparing, go for the ubi-initramfs-recovery-installer.itb. That OpenWRT firmware file isn't from manufacturer, but the file is packaged in a way which makes it compatible to allow easy installation:
On "Start Upgrade" there will be a warning. Click "Ok" and wait patiently for couple minutes.
Step 2: Upgrade your OpenWRT recovery into a real OpenWRT
When all the firmware flashing is done, your factory firmware is gone:
There is no password. Just "Login". An OpenWRT welcome screen will be shown:
Now that you're running OpenWRT, your next task is to go from recovery to real thing. I'm not sure if I'll ever want to go back, but as recommended by OpenWRT instructions, I did take backups of all four mtdblocks: bl2, fip, factory and ubi. This step is optinal:
When you're ready, go for the firmware upgrade. This time select openwrt-mediatek-mt7622-linksys_e8450-ubi-squashfs-sysupgrade.itb:
To repeat the UBI / non-UBI firmware: This is the UBI-version. It is recommended as it has better optimization for layout and management of SPI flash, but it does not allow fallbacking to vendor firmware.
I unchecked the "Keep settings and retain the current configuration" to make sure I got a fresh start with OpenWRT. On "Continue", yet another round of waiting will occur:
Step 3: Setup your wireless AP
Déjà vu!
You have seen this exact screen before. Login (there is no password yet):
Second time, same screen but with this time there is a proper firmware in the AP. Go set the admin account properly to get rid of the "There is no password set on this router" -nag. Among all settings, go to wireless configuration to verify both 2.4 and 5 GHz radios are off:
Go fix that. Select "Edit" for the 5 GHz radio and you'll be greeted by a regular wireless access point configuration dialog. It will include section about wireless security:
As I wanted to improve my WLAN security, I steer away from WPA2 and went for a WPA3-SAE security. Supporting both at the same time is possible, but securitywise it isn't wise. If your system allows wireless clients to associate with a weaker solution, they will.
Also for security, check KRACK attack countermeasures. For more details on KRACK, see: https://www.krackattacks.com/
When you've done, you should see radio enabled on a dialog like this:
Step 4: Done! Test.
That's it! Now you're running a proper firmware on our precious Wi-Fi 6 AP. But how fast it is?
As I said, I don't have many Wi-Fi 6 clients to test with. On my 1 gig fiber, iPad seems to be pretty fast. Also my Android phone speed is ... well ... acceptable.
For that speed test I didn't even go for the "one foot distance" which manufacturers love to do. As nobody uses their mobile devices right next to their AP, I tested this on a real life -scenario where both AP and I were located the way I would use Internet in my living room.
Final words
After three year wait Wi-Fi 6 is here! Improved security, improved speed, improved everything!
DynDNS updates to your Cloud DNS - Updated
Monday, July 12. 2021
Python 3.9 in RedHat Enterprise Linux 8.4
Tuesday, May 25. 2021
Behind the scenes: Reality of running a blog - Story of a failure
Monday, March 22. 2021
... or any (un)social media activity.
IMHO the mentioned "social" media isn't. There are statistics and research to establish the un-social aspect of it. Dopamin-loop in your brain keeps feeding regular doses to make person's behaviour addicted to an activity and keep the person leeching for more material. This very effectively disconnects people from the real world and makes the dive deeper into the rabbit hole of (un)social media.
What most of the dopamin-dosed viewer of any published material keep ignoring is the peak-of-an-iceberg -phenomenon. What I mean is a random visitor gets to see something amazingly cool. A video or picture depicting something that's very impressive and assume that person's life consists of a series of such events. Also humans tend to compare. What that random visitor does next is compares the amazing thing to his/hers own "dull" personal life, which does not consist of a such imaginary sequence of wonderful events. Imaginary, because reality is always harsh. As most of the time we don't know the real story, it is possible for 15 seconds of video footage to take months or preparation, numerous failures, reasonable amounts of money and a lot of effort to happen.
An example of harsh reality, the story of me trying to get a wonderful piece of tech-blogging published.
I started tinkering with a Raspberry Pi 4B. That's something I've planned for a while, ordered some parts and most probably will publish the actual story of the success later. Current status of the project is, well planned, underway, but nowhere near finished.
What happened was for the console output of the Linux to look like this:
That's "interesting" at best. Broken to say the least.
For debugging of this, I rebooted the Raspi into previous Linux kernel of 5.8 and ta-daa! Everything was working again. Most of you are running Raspian, which has Linux 5.4. As I have the energy to burn into hating all of those crappy debians and ubuntus, my obvious choice is a Fedora Linux Workstation AArch64-build.
To clarify the naming: ARM build of Fedora Linux is a community driven effort, it is not run by Red Hat, Inc. nor The Fedora Project.
Ok, enough name/org -talk, back to Raspi.
When in a Linux graphics go that wrong, I always disable the graphical boot in Plymouth splash-screen. Running plymouth-set-default-theme details --rebuild-initrd will do the trick of displaying all-text at the boot. However, it did not fix the problem on my display. Next I had a string of attempts doing all kinds of Kernel parameter tinkering, especially with deactivating Frame Buffer, learning all I could from KMS or Kernel Mode Setting, attempting to build Raspberry Pi's userland utilities to gain insight of EDID-information just to realize they'll never build on a 64-bit Linux, failing with nomodeset and vga=0 as Kernel Parameters to solve the problem. No matter what I told the kernel, display would fail. Every. Single. Time.
It hit me quite late in troubleshooting. While observing the sequence of boot-process, during early stages of boot everything worked and display was un-garbled. Then later when Feodra was starting system services everything fell. Obviously something funny happened with GPU-driver of Broadcom BCM2711 -chip of VideoCore 4, aka. vc4 in that particular Linux-build when the driver was loaded. Creating file /etc/modprobe.d/vc4-blacklist.conf with contents of blacklist vc4 to prevent VideoCore4 driver from ever loading did solve the issue! Yay! Finally found the problem.
All of this took several hours, I'd say 4-5 hours straight work. What happened next was surprising. Now that I had the problem isolated into GPU-driver, on IRC's #fedora-arm -channel, people said vc4 HDMI-output was a known problem and was already fixed in Linux 5.11. Dumbfounded by this answer, I insisted version 5.10 of being the latest and 5.11 lacking availability. They insisted back. Couple hours before me asking, 5.11 was deployed into mirrors sites for everybody to receive. This happened while I was investigating failing and investigating more.
dnf update, reboot and pooof. Problem was gone!
There is no real story here. In pursuit of getting the thing fixed, it fixed itself by time. All I had to do is wait (which obviously I did not do). Failure after failure, but no juicy story on how to fix the HDMI-output. On a typical scenario, this type of story would not get published. No sane person would shine any light on a failure and time wasted.
However, this is what most of us do with computers. Fail, retry and attempt to get results. No glory, just hard work.
... or any (un)social media activity.
IMHO the mentioned "social" media isn't. There are statistics and research to establish the un-social aspect of it. Dopamin-loop in your brain keeps feeding regular doses to make person's behaviour addicted to an activity and keep the person leeching for more material. This very effectively disconnects people from the real world and makes the dive deeper into the rabbit hole of (un)social media.
What most of the dopamin-dosed viewer of any published material keep ignoring is the peak-of-an-iceberg -phenomenon. What I mean is a random visitor gets to see something amazingly cool. A video or picture depicting something that's very impressive and assume that person's life consists of a series of such events. Also humans tend to compare. What that random visitor does next is compares the amazing thing to his/hers own "dull" personal life, which does not consist of a such imaginary sequence of wonderful events. Imaginary, because reality is always harsh. As most of the time we don't know the real story, it is possible for 15 seconds of video footage to take months or preparation, numerous failures, reasonable amounts of money and a lot of effort to happen.
An example of harsh reality, the story of me trying to get a wonderful piece of tech-blogging published.
I started tinkering with a Raspberry Pi 4B. That's something I've planned for a while, ordered some parts and most probably will publish the actual story of the success later. Current status of the project is, well planned, underway, but nowhere near finished.
What happened was for the console output of the Linux to look like this:
That's "interesting" at best. Broken to say the least.
For debugging of this, I rebooted the Raspi into previous Linux kernel of 5.8 and ta-daa! Everything was working again. Most of you are running Raspian, which has Linux 5.4. As I have the energy to burn into hating all of those crappy debians and ubuntus, my obvious choice is a Fedora Linux Workstation AArch64-build.
To clarify the naming: ARM build of Fedora Linux is a community driven effort, it is not run by Red Hat, Inc. nor The Fedora Project.
Ok, enough name/org -talk, back to Raspi.
When in a Linux graphics go that wrong, I always disable the graphical boot in Plymouth splash-screen. Running plymouth-set-default-theme details --rebuild-initrd will do the trick of displaying all-text at the boot. However, it did not fix the problem on my display. Next I had a string of attempts doing all kinds of Kernel parameter tinkering, especially with deactivating Frame Buffer, learning all I could from KMS or Kernel Mode Setting, attempting to build Raspberry Pi's userland utilities to gain insight of EDID-information just to realize they'll never build on a 64-bit Linux, failing with nomodeset and vga=0 as Kernel Parameters to solve the problem. No matter what I told the kernel, display would fail. Every. Single. Time.
It hit me quite late in troubleshooting. While observing the sequence of boot-process, during early stages of boot everything worked and display was un-garbled. Then later when Feodra was starting system services everything fell. Obviously something funny happened with GPU-driver of Broadcom BCM2711 -chip of VideoCore 4, aka. vc4 in that particular Linux-build when the driver was loaded. Creating file /etc/modprobe.d/vc4-blacklist.conf with contents of blacklist vc4 to prevent VideoCore4 driver from ever loading did solve the issue! Yay! Finally found the problem.
All of this took several hours, I'd say 4-5 hours straight work. What happened next was surprising. Now that I had the problem isolated into GPU-driver, on IRC's #fedora-arm -channel, people said vc4 HDMI-output was a known problem and was already fixed in Linux 5.11. Dumbfounded by this answer, I insisted version 5.10 of being the latest and 5.11 lacking availability. They insisted back. Couple hours before me asking, 5.11 was deployed into mirrors sites for everybody to receive. This happened while I was investigating failing and investigating more.
dnf update, reboot and pooof. Problem was gone!
There is no real story here. In pursuit of getting the thing fixed, it fixed itself by time. All I had to do is wait (which obviously I did not do). Failure after failure, but no juicy story on how to fix the HDMI-output. On a typical scenario, this type of story would not get published. No sane person would shine any light on a failure and time wasted.
However, this is what most of us do with computers. Fail, retry and attempt to get results. No glory, just hard work.
Windows 10 Aero: shaker minimize all windows - disable
Friday, February 26. 2021
podman - Running containers in Fedora 31+
Tuesday, November 10. 2020
Getting rid of Flash from Windows - For good
Wednesday, October 28. 2020
Today, Microsoft released KB4577586, Update for the removal of Adobe Flash Player. This is wonderful news! I've been waiting for this moment to happen for many many years. Many organizations will cease to support Adobe Flash end of this year and this release is an anticipated step on that path. Goodbye Flash!
Updates need to be manually downloaded from Microsoft Update Catalog, link: https://www.catalog.update.microsoft.com/search.aspx?q=kb4577586. The reason for this is the earliness. If you're not as impatient as I, the update will go its natural flow and eventually be automatically offered by your Windows.
As you can see from the listing, you need to be super-careful when picking the correct file to download. Also, to make things worse, there are some discrepancies in the descriptions:
To get the exact version of your Windows, run winver. It will output something like this:
In that example, the package required is for Windows 10 release 1909. To download the correct package, you also need to know the processor architecture. Whether it's AMD-64, Intel-32 or ARM-64 cannot be determined from above information. If you have no idea, just go with x64 for processor architecture, that's a very likely match. Those not running x64 will know the answer without querying.
As a software engineer, I obviously wanted to extract all the required information programmatically. I automated the process of getting to know the exact version your particular Windows is running by writing and publishing a helper-script for PowerShell Core. If you are able to run PowerShell Core, the script is available at: https://gist.github.com/HQJaTu/640d0bb0b96215a9c5ce9807eccf3c19. Result will look something like this:
Result will differ on your machine, but that's the output on my Windows 10 Pro release 1909 (x64) build 18363. Couple of other examples are:
Windows 10 Pro release 2004 (x64) build 20241 on my Windows Insider preview
Windows 8.1 Pro with Media Center (x64) build 9600 on my Windows 8.1
If you managed to pick out the correct .msu-file, on running it, output will query if you want to proceed with installation:
In case of a mismatch, error will say something about that particular update not being applicable to your computer:
After installation, go verify the results of Flash being removed. Running your regular Chrome (or Firefox) won't do the trick. They won't support Flash anyways. What you just did was removed Flash from Windows, aka. Internet Explorer. Go to https://www.whatismybrowser.com/detect/is-flash-installed and observe results:
On a Windows, where KB4577586 hasn't been successfully applied, message will indicate existence of Adobe Flash player:
That's it. Flash-b-gone!
Today, Microsoft released KB4577586, Update for the removal of Adobe Flash Player. This is wonderful news! I've been waiting for this moment to happen for many many years. Many organizations will cease to support Adobe Flash end of this year and this release is an anticipated step on that path. Goodbye Flash!
Updates need to be manually downloaded from Microsoft Update Catalog, link: https://www.catalog.update.microsoft.com/search.aspx?q=kb4577586. The reason for this is the earliness. If you're not as impatient as I, the update will go its natural flow and eventually be automatically offered by your Windows.
As you can see from the listing, you need to be super-careful when picking the correct file to download. Also, to make things worse, there are some discrepancies in the descriptions:
To get the exact version of your Windows, run winver. It will output something like this:
In that example, the package required is for Windows 10 release 1909. To download the correct package, you also need to know the processor architecture. Whether it's AMD-64, Intel-32 or ARM-64 cannot be determined from above information. If you have no idea, just go with x64 for processor architecture, that's a very likely match. Those not running x64 will know the answer without querying.
As a software engineer, I obviously wanted to extract all the required information programmatically. I automated the process of getting to know the exact version your particular Windows is running by writing and publishing a helper-script for PowerShell Core. If you are able to run PowerShell Core, the script is available at: https://gist.github.com/HQJaTu/640d0bb0b96215a9c5ce9807eccf3c19. Result will look something like this:
Result will differ on your machine, but that's the output on my Windows 10 Pro release 1909 (x64) build 18363. Couple of other examples are:
Windows 10 Pro release 2004 (x64) build 20241 on my Windows Insider preview
Windows 8.1 Pro with Media Center (x64) build 9600 on my Windows 8.1
If you managed to pick out the correct .msu-file, on running it, output will query if you want to proceed with installation:
In case of a mismatch, error will say something about that particular update not being applicable to your computer:
After installation, go verify the results of Flash being removed. Running your regular Chrome (or Firefox) won't do the trick. They won't support Flash anyways. What you just did was removed Flash from Windows, aka. Internet Explorer. Go to https://www.whatismybrowser.com/detect/is-flash-installed and observe results:
On a Windows, where KB4577586 hasn't been successfully applied, message will indicate existence of Adobe Flash player:
That's it. Flash-b-gone!
