Why cloud platforms exist - Benchmarking Windows Azure
Tuesday, October 8. 2013
Comments
Display comments as
(Linear | Threaded)
Add Comment
I got permission to publish a grayed out version of a project I was contracted to do this summer. Since the customer paid big bucks for it, you're not going to see all the details. I'm sorry to act as a greedy idiot, but you have to hire me to do something similar to see your results.
The subject of my project is something that personally is intriguing to me: how much better does a cloud-native application perform when compared to a traditional LAMP-setup. I chose the cloud platform to be Windows Azure, since I know that one best.
There was a pretty regular web-application for performing couple of specific tasks. Exactly the same sample data was populated to Azure SQL for IaaS-test and Azure Table Storage for PaaS -test. People who complain about using Azure SQL can imagine a faster setup being used on a virtual machine and expect the thing to perform faster.
To simulate a real web application, memory cache was used. Memcache for IaaS and Azure Cache for PaaS. On both occasions using memory cache pushes the performance of the application further as there is no need to do so much expensive I/O.
In the Excel-charts there are number of simulated users at the horizontal axis. There are two vertical axis used for different items.
Following items can be read from the Excel-charts:
I took a ready-made CentOS Linux-image bundled with Nginx/PHP-FPM -pair and lured it to work under Azure and connect to ready populated data from Azure SQL. Here are the test runs from two and three medium instances.
Adding a machine to the service absolutely helps. With two instances, the application chokes completely at the end of test load. Added machine also makes the application perform much faster, there is a clear improvement on page load speed.
Exactly the same functionality was implemented with .Net / C#.
Here are the results:
Astonishing! Page load speed is so much higher on similar user loads, also no errors can be produced. I pushed the envelope with 40 times the users, but couldn't be sure if it was about test setup (which I definitely saturated) or Azure's capacity fluctuating under heavy load. The test with small role was also very satisfactory, it beats the crap out of running two medium instances on IaaS!
I have to state the obvious: PaaS-application performs much better. I just couldn't belive that it was impossible to get exact measurement from the point where the application chokes on PaaS.
Mon | Tue | Wed | Thu | Fri | Sat | Sun |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
← Back | October '24 | |||||
1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | |
7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 |
14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 | 20 |
21 | 22 | 23 | 24 | 25 | 26 | 27 |
28 | 29 | 30 | 31 |