NTPd vs. Chrony

In my Fedora 19 I've been wondering why my NTPd does not start on boot. It used to do so couple of Fedora installations ago. This is not a big deal, so I've been mostly ignoring it. Today I dug up some energy to investigate.

The reason was much simpler than I tought. On my very short checklist were:

1. Confirm that systemd has ntpd.service enabled, it was.
   
2. Confirm that ntpd.service has a dependency to start the service after network interfaces are up, it was chained to do a single ntpdate update and start the daemon after it.
3. Needed interfaces have not been blocked and/or needed interfaces have been enabled in config, everything was out-of-the-box: all network interfaces allowed.
   

The daemon even had the panic-threshold disabled in the config, so it wouldn't choke on startup if time was badly off for some reason. I found no reason for the daemon to start.

However, doing a search for ntpd in /usr/lib/systemd/system revealed what was going on. chronyd.service has Conflicts=ntpd.service in the service description. WTF?! What the hell is chronyd?

According to http://chrony.tuxfamily.org/ it is "a pair of programs which are used to maintain the accuracy of the system clock on a computer". Sounds like a NTPd to me. Running netstat confirmed the fact:

# netstat -nap | fgrep :123
udp        0      0 0.0.0.0:123             0.0.0.0:*                           666/chronyd        
udp6       0      0 :::123                  :::*                                666/chronyd        

The daemon does bind to NTP-ports. To get chronyd running properly, all I had to do was add proper time source and allowed updates from my LAN with allow-directives.

That's it!