Hacker's ramblings

I got a comment from Mr. Martin, that Google changed their SMTPd, so I'll have to revisit the article.

As suggested, new /etc/postfix/smtp_reply_filter would be:

#New 2016/09:
/^5(\d\d )5(.*. \S+ - gsmtp.*)/ 4${1}4$2

Above one is working perfectly on my box.

Again, thanks for Mr. Martin for bringing this topic to my attention.

Every once in a while I have enough time to read books. The ones made out of paper having printed words and images on the paper. And pretty much 98% of the books I've read in the last couple of decades have something to do with my profession. There is one book, that's worth mentioning: Security Engineering by Ross Anderson.

The price point for getting this one is a non-issue, you can download the entire book as a PDF with no cost at http://www.cl.cam.ac.uk/~rja14/book.html (that's at University of Cambridge). Having the book available is fully intentional, as four years have passed, author and publisher have agreed to place the material freely available for anybody interested. I most sincerely thank Mr. Anderson of doing that.

Of yourse, I recommend you to support this good work and purchase one. Go to Amazon, or similar and get your own copy. It will include a digital copy, all you have to do is go to above link and download one.

I'd definitely recommend this book to anybody ever designing or implementing anything with a computer. As the phrase goes: “Smart people learn from their mistakes. But the real sharp ones learn from the mistakes of others.” This is your chance of getting ahead and learning how some smart people blundered in their design and/or implementation of security. There is so much information in the book, but I found the case studies being the best part. The general idea is to get an injection of experience and start to think like hackers do.

My recommendation is that, for anybody working in software engineering should memorize this book and have an exam taken, so that it is crystal clear how secure systems are done.

I was about to do some testing with a cheap Elastic Compute Cloud Linux-instance, but ... AWS wouldn't allocate me one.

Here is the reason from Amazon EC2 Spot Instances Pricing:

Somebody really lost his marbles and is paying ludicrous price for a box.

Ok, in reality that has to be work of two (or more) automated systems competing with each other in a situation where capacity of i2.4xlarge instances is scarce. Any human would do what I did, just pick the bigger box and be happy about that. That instance type with normal pricing costs like $3.41 / hour, and with spot pricing it goes ~60 cents / hour, but not when automated bidding goes haywire.

I wrote couple of posts about Windows 10 upgrades, but there are no more free upgrades. See:

From now on, you'll just have to pay for it.

There are couple of issues I bumped into while upgrading about dozen PCs last month alone and I'll be blogging about those later. There is no rush, as the free upgrade window closed (pun intended).

Before release of Windows 10 build 10565 in October 2015, it was pretty much impossible to do a clean install for upgrading Windows 7 or 8 without first running the upgrade on the target machine. The announcement said:

Device activation improvements: Microsoft has received a lot of feedback from Insiders on making it easier to activate Windows 10 on devices that take advantage of the free upgrade offer to genuine Windows by using existing Windows 7, Windows 8 or Windows 8.1 product keys. If you install this build of the Windows 10 Insider Preview on a PC and it doesn’t automatically activate, you can enter the product key from a qualifying Windows 7, Windows 8 or Windows 8.1 used to activate the prior Windows version on the same device to activate Windows 10 by going to Settings > Update & security > Activation and selecting Change Product Key.

In short: You can whip up your install USB and do a clean install on a machine. If its not an OEM-machine, just enter your Windows 7 or Windows 8 key at install, and the thing should activate. Nice an easy.

And to clarify the exact build number situation your box is running, go to Settings, System, About. It should have something like this:

As suggested by Ilpo in a comment he left in my blog, there is an alternative method described by article How to Directly Clean Install Windows 10 without having to Upgrade First. Of course I had to try that! And thanks Ilpo, for the suggestion.

What you need is a Windows 10 install USB-stick. Go create one with your favorite method, and if you don't have a favorite, just go for Media creation tool, it can download an install image and store it to your USB-stick for later booting.

When your install-stick is ready, go find <your USB-stick drive>:\support\gatherosstate.exe into the target machine to be upgraded. Do NOT run in at the USB-stick, COPY it. I just dragged the file into my desktop. When ran, the application will create a XML-file containing a fingerprint from the machine ran. That fingerprint can be used to active the upgraded Windows 10 installation later. Needless to say, this type of activation will work only for valid upgrade paths. You cannot upgrade Windows 8.1 with Bing into Windows 10 Pro (I tried).

Second important thing: Run the gatherosstate.exe as an Administrator. I tried to validate the run-as-Admin -requirement after the upgrade was done, but it was too late. The file generated will differ. My thinking is, that it is not necessary to run as Admin, but that's what the original instructions said.

Take a copy of the generated GenuineTicket.xml-file. You will need that later. At this point you're good to go with a clean install. Replace hard drives or just re-partition the original one, whatever your install plan is. I'm guessing you wouldn't be doing the upgrade this way if it wasn't absolutely necessary.

During Windows 10 installation do NOT enter a license key. It is possible to "skip this" and "do this later" and ultimately when the install ends run a perfectly good non-activated Windows 10.

Now its time to go activate the newly installed Windows 10. You need to locate your saved GenuineTicket.xml-file and copy it to directory %ProgramData%\Microsoft\Windows\ClipSVC\GenuineTicket. Like this:

Now the activation is only a reboot away. Go ahead and boot the thing, and confirm:

Done! Simple as pie.

One of my own boxes runs a Fedora Linux. A while back my upgrade failed miserably due to Fedora installer not getting an IP-address from my ISP, Elisa. I had a minor skirmish for an hour or so with the installer, but no avail, Fedora installer beat me on that one. As I love to have that box up and running, I gave up and decided to investigate that later. Now that day came and I'm victorious!

Basics

DHCP is what pretty much everybody has for getting an IPv4 address in 2016. Mobile connections have something different, but everything else including Wi-Fi hotspots, ADSL-routers, Fiber-to-the-Home -connections, etc. etc. issue an IP-address (mostly IPv4, sometimes IPv6) to any well-behaving customer of theirs. Today, the de-facto is that the IP-address is allocated out of a well known broadband address range, or pool. Lists of those are generally available, so that home customers can be differentiated from data centers and companies.

To put DHCP simply, it is a mechanism for allocating an unique address for your Internet connection. The Wikipedia definition for Dynamic Host Configuration Protocol uses more words and isn't as concise as mine, but you'll get the idea.

Details of the problem

In case of mis-use or unpaid internet bill, they'd naturally decline any DHCP-requests for an IP-address. Since everything I tested, including various Windowses, OS Xes and Linuxes worked it wasn't about that. The connection was ok, the DHCP server issued a valid DHCP-lease as it had been doing for couple years, but not for my Fedora installer. Duh?

At this point I went to google for the symptoms and quite soon I landed into RedHat Bugzilla. It contains bug 1154200 which is titled as "not getting a dhcp address assigned". Mr. Krovich reports that his Fedora 21 installer won't get an IP-address from ISP. I pulled up a Fedora 20 installer for the previous version. It worked ok! Yep, they changed something into Fedora 21. The change affects Fedora 22, 23 and the latest 24. It does not affect RedHat nor CentOS (yet).

Fix (aka. trial and error)

In the comments of bug 1154200 they're talking about Option 61 commit which was introduced for Fedora 21 release. A possible fix would be to use DHCP-configuration: send dhcp-client-identifier = hardware;

I downloaded Fedora 24 installer and tested it out. It didn't help any. After a lot of wiresharking the traffic, I isolated this:
In the DHCP Discover -packet, there was an Option 61 present.

More poking for man 5 dhclient-options revealed that it was possible to specify a fixed string for identifier. So, again I edited /etc/dhcp/dhclient.conf (btw. the file didn't exist to begin with, I had to create one) to contain:
send dhcp-client-identifier = "";

That did the trick! Now even Fedora 24 installer got a a valid IP-address and it was possible to install.

Specs

In the early days, all IP-addresses were assigned manually. Everybody was given an IP-address and they punched all the details manually. That was frustrating and error-prone, so somebody invented BOOTP to automate the entire setup. Quite soon, that evolved into DHCP, defined by RFC 1531. When DHCP gained traction and more and more vendors joined the dynamically allocated -game, couple of clarifying iterations later, we're at RFC 2131 for current breed of DHCPing. It is basically the original BOOTP, but with most wrinkles ironed out.

The options are defined at RFC 1533 for DHCP Options and BOOTP Vendor Extensions. Looks like nobody supported Option 61 for a long time. Windowses don't, Apple doesn't, most Linux Distros don't, but RFC 4361 for Node-specific Client Identifiers for Dynamic Host Configuration Protocol Version Four (DHCPv4) must have done it for Fedora-guys. They chose to implement request 560361 (Dhclient doesn't use client-identifier; may cause issues in certain bridged environments) and make sure everybody uses it, with assumption that all ISPs that won't support Client Identifiers will merrily ignore the option. Nice!

Afterwards

I'll target equal blame to my ISP. The Option 61 is well-defined and it should be possible to ignore it. Looks like they're running Alcatel-Lucent hardware there and for some reason it is configured to spit on Option 61 requests.

Naturally I reported the error to my ISP, but you can assume how well that goes. Any regular customer facing clerk won't know DHCP or what it does, nor any options of it. So all I got back is the classic "we'll investigate" -style response. I'm not keeping my hopes up. I have more hope on my own Bugzilla request 1357469 to have an option to enable or disable usage of Option 61 on Fedora. They might even implement that one day.

Anyway, I'm hoping that this post will help somebody strugging to install their Fedora.

I'd like to be clear on this: I did not figure this one out myself, I just bumped into Philip Yip's page about this. All the credit should go to him, I just tested this and confirmed it to be working.

One of the upgrades I did earlier this month was for a Windows Vista. Computer geeks point out two things immediately: 1) Vista! Really? Who would use that voluntarily? 2) well, it cannot be upgraded into Windows 10. Both very true. It just so happened, that there was an OEM Vista running on a computer. Vista will cease to have security upgrades on 10th April 2017, so I suggested to upgrade the thing into a 10 while I did some other work on the thing. Obviously the person owning the poor computer didn't want to pay for the upgrade, so I chose to go with Mr. Yip's method on it.

Prerequisites

For this to happen you will need:

• An USB-stick, minimum size 4 GiB
  • This will be used to host the Windows 10 installation image
  • I went to a supermarket and got a brand new 16 GiB USB3 stick for the speed improvements
• Ability to boot the target computer from the above USB-stick
  • Most computers I've worked with can do this
• Windows 10 ISO, build 10130
  • Ok, this one is harder one to come by, but it is generally available in the Big Net. I'm talking about software piracy here.
  • You will need this specific build. Older or newer ones won't do the trick.
• A piece of software to write this ISO-file into the above USB-stick and make it bootable.
  • My favorite thing for doing that is Rufus. It is a solid piece of software to write images into USB-sticks.
• Windows 10 media creation tool
  • You can get one from Microsoft's website
• Possibility to disable internet connection from the target machine and enable it when needed
• Finally: Possiblity to change the BIOS/UEFI date on the target computer.
  • This trick solely relies on the fact, that you can pretend the date to be in the history.

Also please note, that there is NO UPGRADE possibility here. This is effectively a fresh install. If you choose to re-install on top of your existing Vista installation, please take care no to lose any precious data. I installed a bigger hard drive to the computer, so I made sure that the old drive was intact during this process.

Steps

This is how the entire process goes:

1. Use Rufus to create Windows 10 build 10130 USB-stick
   
2. Boot into BIOS/UEFI setup, set date to anything around September 2015. I just bumped back the year and did my installation in "July 2015".
3. Make sure, there is no Internet connection during the installation. THIS IS IMPORTANT!
4. Boot from Windows 10 build 10130 USB. Make sure there is no Internet connectivity on the machine, so that it is impossible for it to update date via NTP or talk to Microsoft.
   1. Run Windows 10 install (for the first time)
   2. During installation, don't bother installing any security upgrades, you will re-install entire Windows 10 after this one completes.
      
   3. Wait couple of hours. This depends on your hardware speed.
   4. Remove the USB
5. Create a recent Windows 10 install USB
   • I had my own computer for media creation and didn't have to use the target computer for this. This can be a parallel process.
   • When asked about the edition, choose Win 10 Pro
6. Turn off internet time when install done. I found that one to be little tricky, but the setting is there.
   
7. Set a specific license key. For this you'll need to open CMD.exe as Administrator. If you attempt this as a regular user, ie. not right clicking the cmd.exe and selecting "run as administrator", you'll notice that soon. The command to execute is:
   slmgr /ipk 6P99N-YF42M-TPGBG-9VMJP-YKHCF
   
8. Connect to internet. THIS is the first time the install machine is allowed to get there. If your box did connect to The Net before this, you have failed.
9. Activate Windows (remember: Admin prompt):
   slmgr /ato
   
10. Now you have an activated Windows 10 running. You can go to My Computer and Properties to confirm.
    
    However, it's an old edition and you don't want to keep that. The important thing is, that now your computer's fingerprint has been stored into Microsoft's server and any subsequent Windows 10 installations will proceed without entering any license key.
11. Just insert the USB install stick with the newer Windows 10 installer (the one you created on step 5) and run setup.exe on that. There is no need for reboot or anything, just run the installer.
12. Install it again! This is your second installation.
    • I choose to keep nothing. This just makes sure, that all the old garbage will be gone after you're done.
    • Please note, that when asked for license key, don't enter any. Always select "Do this later" or "Skip". This is not needed and your newly installed Windows 10 will be activated at the end.
    • Wait 15 minutes
13. You're done! Your Windows is ready to be used.
14. Remove the first installation stored into C:\Windows.old, you don't need to keep any of that. However, the files are protected by operating system and deleting the entire directory prooved to be little tricky. I ended up booting from the USB-installation stick into rescue-mode and chose the cmd.exe from that. On prompt I entered two commands:
    del /S /F /Q c:\Windows.old
rd /S /Q c:\Windows.old

Finally

This process worked for me on 5th July 2016. I don't think this has anything to do with July 29 free upgrade -limitation.

Also I'm sure guys at Microsoft keep track of their installations. They'll know exactly how many licenses they gave out using this method. My thinking is, that they simply don't care. Pretty much all of the competition is giving out operating systems for free and they cannot for some strange reason. Anybody choosing this method needs to be aware, that in an unfortunate scenario they would deactivate all licenses distributed this way.

Happy installing! I know I created one ex-Vista user very happy with this.

Recently I've been doing a lot of Windows 10 upgrades. The free upgrade offer is about to end in less than 15 days:

There is a counter in Windows.com.

My own adoption to Win10 is pretty high, only one box left to upgrade. I'll have to resort to virtual machines for things, that I really, really need Windows 7 for.

The real-time Windows 10 adoption gauge @ gosquared.com shows one third:

That's pretty good, but not the number Microsoft guys are aiming for.

I regularily follow Mr. Gordon Kelly, a writer who publishes @ forbes.com. In December 2015 he wrote a piece with a title 'Free' Windows 10 Has An Expensive Secret. There he pretty much speculates, that Microsoft really wants to get to one billion (1.000.000.000) Windows 10 installations as fast as possible. Not giving away free upgrades to pretty much everybody wouldn't help in that. However, his post after Microsoft's May 2016 press release (Three Reasons Microsoft Stopped Free Windows 10 Upgrades) indicates, that even he gave up hope on prolonged free upgrades being available. I guess, they didn't want to get to one billion that bad. That's something Mr. Richard Hay @ winsupersite.com predicted last December.

It seems that it is possible to prolong your free upgrade offer by enabled assistive technologies. See Microsoft's blog post about that. But unless you do that, it's time to act on it or do some trickery after July 29th.

For my Windows 10 weeks, I'll be posting couple of articles what I did earlier this month with my various upgrades.

I'll post something about not computers for a change. Its pretty close, but still, not about computers.

Any self-respecting nerd (such as me) loves video games. Doing first-person-shooter games IRL is always both fun and a lot more difficult than on a computer. 

We had a company activity and went to nearby Megazone for couple rounds of always fun laser tag. Since it was my first time ever doing that, it was like a slap in the face. I'm a 2nd lieutenant in FDF reserve, so I have basic understanding of tactics in a battle. Also I've played video games since early 80s and FPS games since first Wolfenstein. On top of that I've been paintballing enough to know that there is enough realism in video games and paintballing to match real military tactics. However, anything I knew about combat, tactics and fighting at that point was usless.

In the game there were three teams and you, so pretty much everybody you see is an enemy. Megazone is mostly about movement and speedy tags of any visible opponents. The worst thing that can happen to you there is that you're unable to fire your weapon for 8 seconds. During a 25 minute round that's not too dangrous. In paintball or war you're out on the first "tag", here you aren't, it's just a game of accumulating points.

Here are my stats from first round:

I sucked!

My handle in the game was Macro (in the Red team), so being 8th out of 14 wasn't that good. Tactically the maze was a nightmare! In the original Wolfenstein it was possible to be hit only from front, back or sides. In Megazone there were 2 floors, but it was a metal grid walkway making it possible to shoot trough. That made it 5th direction where getting hit was possible. At best I found couple locations where it was possible to get some cover and get hit only from two directions. The only even semi-functional tactic I found was to ignore any defence, cover and cautiousness. Just going recklessly forward and out-gunning everybody on a reaction seemed to work good. Also sniping people long-range was a really good tactic, sometimes I could do 4-5 people from a single position. They never saw me. I also did try attacking enemy bases and defending own base, but they were totally pointless exercises in futility, I spent too much time trying to figure out the value of those.

Here is my second round:

Quite an improvement in points and ranking. I was best in our team and 3rd in total!

Megazone was great fun, but with my background, it'll never be my favorite thing. I want to see my opponents suffering when I hit them, in laser tag that doesn't happen.

Curl is one weird piece of software. Every time I use it, I get chills. The reason for this is, that it almost works and when it doesn't there isn't a damn thing you can to to fix it. The entire design of that software is ... I'm lost for words here. I'm looking for words that describe: cumbersome, shitty, unorthodox, non-functional, and so on.

Since the lib-version is used by a number of libraries and other software as a means to provide HTTP-protocol implementation I do run into curl-issues often. Many times I didn't even know, that in the end I was using libcurl for access before one of these obscure errors pops. For this reason, my weapon-of-choice is wget, it uses OpenSSL's crypto and is fully compatible with pretty much everything else in a Linux-distro.

Anyway, this time I chose to research this to the bitter and. It took me about a month (calendar time) to resolve this. Of course I didn't spend all my time and energy into this, it just took a very long time to get this one done properly & right.

The problem

One day, I was just tinkering something and ran a command:

$ curl --verbose https://packetstormsecurity.net/

... and it pulled a curl on me.

* About to connect() to packetstormsecurity.net port 443 (#0)
* Trying 198.84.60.198...
* Connected to packetstormsecurity.net (198.84.60.198) port 443 (#0)
* Initializing NSS with certpath: sql:/etc/pki/nssdb
*   CAfile: /etc/pki/tls/certs/ca-bundle.crt
  CApath: none
* Server certificate:
*       subject: CN=packetstormsecurity.com,OU=Domain Control Validated
*       start date: May 31 18:04:40 2015 GMT
*       expire date: May 31 18:04:40 2016 GMT
*       common name: packetstormsecurity.com
*       issuer: CN=Go Daddy Secure Certificate Authority - G2,
              OU=http://certs.godaddy.com/repository/,
              O="GoDaddy.com, Inc.",L=Scottsdale,ST=Arizona,C=US
* NSS error -8179 (SEC_ERROR_UNKNOWN_ISSUER)
* Peer's Certificate issuer is not recognized.

* Closing connection 0
curl: (60) Peer's Certificate issuer is not recognized.
More details here: http://curl.haxx.se/docs/sslcerts.html

curl performs SSL certificate verification by default, using a "bundle"
 of Certificate Authority (CA) public keys (CA certs). If the default
 bundle file isn't adequate, you can specify an alternate file
 using the --cacert option.
If this HTTPS server uses a certificate signed by a CA represented in
 the bundle, the certificate verification probably failed due to a
 problem with the certificate (it might be expired, or the name might
 not match the domain name in the URL).
If you'd like to turn off curl's verification of the certificate, use
 the -k (or --insecure) option.

I hate when that happens. Also I don't know who forgot to do what, but it just won't work and nobody in the entire Internet knows how to handle that.

Figuring out the details of the issue

This is the easy part:

* NSS error -8179 (SEC_ERROR_UNKNOWN_ISSUER)
* Peer's Certificate issuer is not recognized.

In human language that reads: The problem is with HTTPS. The certificate used by the remote site is issued by a Certificate Authority (CA), that we don't know of and because we don't know it we won't trust any certificates issued by it.

Further:

* Initializing NSS with certpath: sql:/etc/pki/nssdb
* CAfile: /etc/pki/tls/certs/ca-bundle.crt
  CApath: none

In human that reads: There were three (3) places I tried looking for the root-certificate:

1. NSS is the Network Security Services -library created by Mozilla. Its database is located at: /etc/pki/nssdb
2. OpenSSL is the library/toolkit used by pretty much rest of your Linux for HTTPS-encryption. It has the trusted root-certificates at: /etc/pki/tls/certs/ca-bundle.crt
3. OpenSSL didn't use a directory (CApath) for certificates.

After doing all three of those, no suitable CA was found and curl had to disconnect from the server and inform user about this lack-of-trust -issue.

Possible solutions

Ignore the issue and force curl to continue

There is a suggestion:
turn off curl's verification of the certificate, use the -k (or --insecure) option

This goes right out the window, because I'd rather chew off my left arm than force a prefectly valid check to be ignored. I'd rather spend the time investigating the fix. But that's me. Most of you don't care. I do.

Add the missing certificate to ca-bundle.crt

Good idea, but ... That file is reserved for the operating system / distro by OpenSSL. Actually curl uses this file only to make its own life easier so that curl doesn't have to distribute a set of trusted CA certificates, it just piggy-backs with something OpenSSL has.

Since this approach is OpenSSL-specific there is a procedure for adding own CA root-certificates into your system. When a new CA-root needs to be installed the mechanism is not to copy the certificate into this big file. How to actually do it, we'll get into that later.

The obvious problem with this approach is, that next time your distro gets a new CA-bundle one of two things will happen: 1) your changes will be overwritten and lost, you'll have to add the CA-root again or 2) the new CA-bundle won't be installed, because somebody messed up a file which he/she shouldn't do. This is definitely not a good approach.

Implicitly specify the CA root-certificate file

Aa-ha! There is a command-line option for this purpose:

--cacert <CA certificate>
       (SSL) Tells curl to use the specified certificate file to verify
       the  peer.  The  file  may contain multiple CA certificates. The
       certificate(s) must be in PEM format. Normally curl is built  to
       use a default file for this, so this option is typically used to
       alter that default file.

That's the one I could use, if I'd like to do that every goddamn single time I curl for something. First I don't want to do that every time and second, that command-line option isn't available for me, as I was using a piece of software wrapped to use libcurl.

Add the missing CA root-certificate into NSS database to establish trust

This is the one I chose. This is also the one nobody gets solved.
If you can find precise information on the web how to fix this, please tell me. I've been browsing the net for partial and non-working solutions enough not to care for half-assed solutions which don't work at the end.

Getting the missing certificate

Whatever we do (except just ignore the problem), the missing root-certificate needs to be located. With a little bit of googling I found a page Repository, Here’s a collection of important certificate documentation (https://certs.godaddy.com/repository/) at GoDaddy's server. Sure, the initial impression was "whoa, that was easy!", but when I landed on the page, I realized that there were following root-certificates available for GoDaddy Certificate Chain - G2 to download:

1. GoDaddy Class 2 Certification Authority Root Certificate - G2
2. GoDaddy Secure Server Certificate (Intermediate Certificate) - G2
3. Microsoft to GoDaddy G2 Cross Certificate
4. GoDaddy G2 Code Signing Intermediate
5. GoDaddy Secure Extended Validation Code Signing CA - G2
6. GoDaddy Certificate Bundle for Microsoft Windows Driver Signing - G2
7. GoDaddy Certificate Bundles - G2
8. GoDaddy PKCS7 Certificate Intermediates Bundle (for Windows IIS) - G2
9. GoDaddy Certificate Bundles - G2 With Cross to G1
10. GoDaddy Certificate Bundles - G2 With Cross to G1, includes Root

Ok, which one will I need? Darn!

Luckily I know something about X.509 certificates and especially certificate extensions. There should be an AIA or Authority Information Access -section (see RFC 5280 section 5.2.7 for details) in the cert. At least most CAs provide that information to make people's life easier.

First download the cert with a one-liner:

$ echo | \
  openssl s_client -connect packetstormsecurity.net:443 \
​  > /tmp/packetstormsecurity.net.cert

Btw. the one-liner will say dumb things like:

depth=0 OU = Domain Control Validated, CN = packetstormsecurity.com
verify error:num=20:unable to get local issuer certificate
verify return:1
depth=0 OU = Domain Control Validated, CN = packetstormsecurity.com
verify error:num=27:certificate not trusted
verify return:1
depth=0 OU = Domain Control Validated, CN = packetstormsecurity.com
verify error:num=21:unable to verify the first certificate
verify return:1

That's just vomit from the fact, that the certificate isn't trusted. The important thing is, that the one-liner will result a text-file with lot of other garbage, but also the server certificate PEM. Luckily OpenSSL will ignore all the garbage when doing command:

$ openssl x509 -noout -text -in /tmp/packetstormsecurity.net.cert

That one will output a lot of stuff. Most if which are irrelevent for this purpose. The relevant things are:

Certificate:
  Signature Algorithm: sha256WithRSAEncryption
      Issuer: C=US, ST=Arizona, L=Scottsdale, O=GoDaddy.com, Inc.,
              OU=http://certs.godaddy.com/repository/,
              CN=Go Daddy Secure Certificate Authority - G2
      X509v3 extensions:
          X509v3 Certificate Policies:
              Policy: 2.16.840.1.114413.1.7.23.1
                CPS: http://certificates.godaddy.com/repository/
          Authority Information Access:
              OCSP - URI:http://ocsp.godaddy.com/
              CA Issuers -
              URI:http://certificates.godaddy.com/repository/gdig2.crt
          X509v3 Authority Key Identifier:
     keyid:40:C2:BD:27:8E:CC:34:83:30:A2:33:D7:FB:6C:B3:F0:B4:2C:80:CE

Exactly what we needed! There is an AIA-block with a direct URL of http://certificates.godaddy.com/repository/gdig2.crt in it.

A download:

$ wget http://certificates.godaddy.com/repository/gdig2.crt \
  -O "/etc/pki/tls/certs/Go Daddy Secure Certificate Authority - G2.pem"

... and verify that certificate's serial number:

$ openssl x509 -noout -text \
  -in /etc/pki/tls/certs/Go\ Daddy\ Secure\ Certificate\ Authority\ -\ G2.pem

... will reveal:

Certificate:
    Signature Algorithm: sha256WithRSAEncryption
        Issuer: C=US, ST=Arizona, L=Scottsdale, O=GoDaddy.com, Inc.,
                CN=Go Daddy Root Certificate Authority - G2
        Subject: C=US, ST=Arizona, L=Scottsdale, O=GoDaddy.com, Inc.,
                 OU=http://certs.godaddy.com/repository/,
                 CN=Go Daddy Secure Certificate Authority - G2
        X509v3 extensions:
            X509v3 Subject Key Identifier:
           40:C2:BD:27:8E:CC:34:83:30:A2:33:D7:FB:6C:B3:F0:B4:2C:80:CE
            X509v3 Authority Key Identifier:
     keyid:3A:9A:85:07:10:67:28:B6:EF:F6:BD:05:41:6E:20:C1:94:DA:0F:DE

Oh yes x 2!! The CA certificate has the correct serial number. It issued the failing certificate. This proof of correct CA-chain. We found the correct file.

Establishing trust to the new CA root-certificate in OpenSSL

This is the easy part. This one I have done hundreds of times.

First get a hash of the certificate:

$ openssl x509 -hash -noout \
  -in /etc/pki/tls/certs/Go\ Daddy\ Secure\ Certificate\ Authority\ -\ G2.pem

For this particular certificate, the hash is 27eb7704. The next thing is to instruct OpenSSL that this newly downloaded certificate is trusted by our server. It can be done like this:

$ ln -s /etc/pki/tls/certs/Go\ Daddy\ Secure\ Certificate\ Authority\ -\ G2.pem \
  /etc/pki/tls/certs/27eb7704.0

The idea is to symlink the downloaded file with a filename from the hash and suffix the file with a .0 (dot-zero).

Now we can verify, that our setup was done correctly (remember the "garbage" file we downloaded earlier):

$ openssl verify /tmp/packetstormsecurity.net.cert

The only valid output would be:

/tmp/packetstormsecurity.net.cert: OK

Anything else, and you fumbled it.

Additional step: Add all hashes of the certificate chain

Command line openssl-command is at level now, however that's not how applications access certificates. Now this is where the CLI-command and library functionality differ. My box has /usr/lib64/libssl.so.10 to do the work for an application.

Looking at the SSL_CTX_use_certificate documentation, it's evident that there are functions to add a known certificate bundle (/etc/pki/ca-trust/extracted/pem/tls-ca-bundle.pem in my box, symlinked via /etc/pki/tls/certs/ca-bundle.crt), or a single certificate file. Not a directory of certificates, what openssl-command does. An application has to iterate the directory and add every certificate individually. For example in Perl, HTTPS-connections are typically created via IO::Socket::SSL-library. It accempts two options: SSL_ca_path and SSL_ca_file.

As the option of modifying the ca-bundle.crt file was abandoned already, using option SSL_ca_file is out. It leaves us with SSL_ca_path, which requires every certificate hash to be symlinked to the appropriate certificate PEM-file. That's why the already done symlink won't do it completely, two additional ones are required to get IO::Socket::SSL working properly:

$ ln -s ca-bundle.crt cbf06781.0
$ ln -s ca-bundle.crt f081611a.0

Where those two hashes come from is bit complex, but here goes:
The intermediate CA certificate we downloaded, Go Daddy Secure Certificate Authority - G2, was issued by:

$ openssl x509 -noout -issuer_hash
  -in Go\ Daddy\ Secure\ Certificate\ Authority\ -\ G2.pem

... a certificate which has hash of cbf06781, which is already packed into ca-bundle.crt. Here things go weird, the Go Daddy Root Certificate Authority - G2 having hash cbf06781 is self-signed. However, during web-access that exact same certificate (with same serial number and all) is issued by a certificate having hash of f081611a. In ca-bundle.crt there is one with subject Go Daddy Class 2 Certification Authority. So, we need to add both to keep applications happy. Looks like somebody at Go Daddy really dropped the ball. Why should there be two separate CA certificates? Insane.

Actually, for example OpenSuSE Linux distro does that automatically to all bundle-certificates. The system is so stupid, that symlinkin all certificates is the only working method.

Establishing trust to the new CA root-certificate in NSS

Ok, this is the impossible part.

By lot of googling, poking around, failing, reading docs, tracing Curl, etc. I found out that there is a tool called certutil - Utility to manipulate NSS certificate databases. It seems to belong to package nss-tools. There is a man-page and some documentation at Network Security Services. But what's happening and how should I proceed remains bit foggy.

There is a /etc/pki/nssdb/, which we found in the beginning of this. That directory contains the NSS database in form of bunch of files. I found out that cert8.db and key3.db are completely obsoleted and any access methods having certutil -d /etc/pki/nssdb/ are completely useless, because they access only those files. Nobody/nothing uses those. Why are they there?

The files having effect are cert9.db and key4.db. The correct way of accessing those includes certutil -d sql:/etc/pki/nssdb. Notice the sql: -part difference. That's the part causing most confusion.

To get the certificate into the DB run command on a single line:

certutil -d sql:/etc/pki/nssdb -A -t "C,C,C"
  -n "Go Daddy Secure Certificate Authority - G2"
  -i /etc/pki/tls/certs/Go\ Daddy\ Secure\ Certificate\ Authority\ -\ G2.pem

Now your NSS DB should list:

# certutil -d sql:/etc/pki/nssdb -L

Certificate Nickname                        Trust Attributes
                                            SSL,S/MIME,JAR/XPI
Go Daddy Secure Certificate Authority - G2  C,C,C

The three Cs mean that the certificate in the DB is an authority for servers, e-mail and code signing. certutil docs say, that using 'C' for intermediate certificates is discouraged, and I didn't bother to check if that 'C' is needed at all. But having that doesn't break anything now the setup is done.

Testing

Now, running exactly the same command:

$ curl --verbose https://packetstormsecurity.net/

... will result in:

* About to connect() to dl.packetstormsecurity.net port 443 (#0)
*   Trying 198.84.60.200...
* Connected to dl.packetstormsecurity.net (198.84.60.200) port 443 (#0)
* Initializing NSS with certpath: sql:/etc/pki/nssdb
*   CAfile: /etc/pki/tls/certs/ca-bundle.crt   CApath: none
* SSL connection using TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384
* Server certificate:
*       subject: CN=packetstormsecurity.com,OU=Domain Control Validated
*       start date: May 31 18:04:40 2015 GMT
*       expire date: May 31 18:04:40 2016 GMT
*       common name: packetstormsecurity.com
*       issuer: CN=Go Daddy Secure Certificate Authority - G2,
               OU=http://certs.godaddy.com/repository/,
               O="GoDaddy.com, Inc.",L=Scottsdale,ST=Arizona,C=US

< HTTP/1.1 200 OK

Yesh! It works!

One hell of a thing to get fixed, but now the trust has been established so that it reaches also Curl and any applications using libcurl.

Final words

This is a multi-mess.

First: Go Daddy messes up their certs. Why isn't their Go Daddy Secure Certificate Authority - G2 in ca-bundle.crt? Why are there two version of Go Daddy Root Certificate Authority - G2?

Second: Having NSS in a Linux is insane! Nobody else is using that for certificate storage. libcurl's support for any own CAs is completely messed up and unusable.

I was about to upgrade an old CentOS 6 box into 7. It was all planned, backups taken, necessary information gathered and USB stick prepared with 7.2 DVD image in it. A shutdown and boot from the installation USB, bunch of settings, date/time, keyboard, network, but Däng! No dice.

My initial attempt was to install from USB, but for some reason the server didn't see the USB volume as a valid installation source. No problem, I thought, let's go for network-install then. The interface was already up and the box could reach Internet ok. Installing from a mirror shouldn't take too long. But no. All I could accomplish was a "Error setting up base repository". I went googling about this and found CentOS 7.2 Netinstall Guide – Network Installation Screenshots.

First I set up installation source as On the network: http://mirror.centos.org/centos/7.2.1511/os/x86_64/ and then This URL refers to a mirror list: Checked. No avail. It took about 8 minutes to get the error, but this approach failed miserably. What /tmp/packaging.log had was:

ERR packaging: failed to grab repo metadata for anaconda: Cannot find a valid baseurl for repo: anaconda
ERR packaging: metadata download for repo anaconda failed after 10 retries

Argh! 8 minutes to determine, that the thing didn't work.

There was plenty of time to plan for the next move. I went to see CentOS mirror list, and picked the local Finnish mirror at nic.FUNET. Setting that as source: http://ftp.funet.fi/pub/mirrors/centos.org/7.2.1511/os/x86_64/ and with This URL refers to a mirror list: set as Unchecked got me butkus, /tmp/packaging.log had:

ERR packaging: failed to grab repo metadata for anaconda: failure: repodata/6990209f63a9fd811f13e830ac3c6de4c5d70a42b1c6873e4329b523d394c3bd-primary.xml.gz from anaconda: [Errno 256] No more mirrors to try.
http://ftp.funet.fi/pub/mirrors/centos.org/7.2.1511/os/x86_64/repodata/
6990209f63a9fd811f13e830ac3c6de4c5d70a42b1c6873e4329b523d394c3bd-primary.xml.gz: [Errno 14] HTTP Error 404 - Not Found

Finally a tangible result. Obviously the HTTP/404 was correct. There is no such file in that directory. It took me about 15 seconds to determine, that the URL should be http://ftp.funet.fi/pub/mirrors/centos.org/7.2.1511/os/x86_64/repodata/
0e54cd65abd3621a0baf9a963eafb1a0ffd53603226f02aadce59635329bc937-primary.xml.gz. Something was off in the installer metadata. But where?

I checked treeinfo at http://ftp.funet.fi/pub/mirrors/centos.org/7.2.1511/os/x86_64/.treeinfo, but no avail. Then my poking around landed at /var/run/install/repo/repodata. It has among others, a file named repomd.xml. Looking at the network version from http://ftp.funet.fi/pub/mirrors/centos.org/7.2.1511/os/x86_64/repodata/repomd.xml made everything clear as crystal.

• Drive had:
  • revision 1449702798
  • 6990209f63a9fd811f13e830ac3c6de4c5d70a42b1c6873e4329b523d394c3bd, the file that doesn't exist in the mirror
• Network had:
  • revision 1449700451
  • 0e54cd65abd3621a0baf9a963eafb1a0ffd53603226f02aadce59635329bc937, the file that does exist

But how to fix this?

My initial attempt was to wget http://ftp.funet.fi/pub/mirrors/centos.org/7.2.1511/os/x86_64/repodata/repomd.xml into /var/run/install/repo/repodata and retry, but that didn't change anything, still the same frustrating error after 10 minute delay.

I rebooted the box and relized, that my change persisted on the USB-drive. Whoa! Anyway, I got things cooking this time. Finally the base repository was accepted, I got to go make installation selection and got the install forward.

What the hell was going on there? Where did the incorrect repomd.xml come from? It isn't in the installation image. Or it is, but it comes from a place I didn't find. Whatever it is, there is something seriously off in the process. Why doesn't the installer try to get the most recent version from the network. It is a network install, after all!! After frustrating couple hours later than anticipated, I finally got the box upgraded. Hopefully this information saves you that time.

Advertisement blocking is kind of hot topic in today's Internet. Pages with this type of content are becoming more popular:

Hell yeah I block every bit of JavaScript, IFrame and cookie that I don't like of.

The flipside of the issue is that monetization becomes a lot more difficult when no ads are being displayed. New York Times has a quite fresh article about that: Rise of Ad-Blocking Software Threatens Online Revenue. There is nothing new in that, Forbes wrote about the same issue an year ago: Is using ad-blocking software morally wrong? The debate continues. That article says:

"Some critics argue — as I did in a recent post — that the bigger problem is the advertising model that many media outlets are based on, and the fact that it requires them to rely on invasive tracking software, annoying popups and other low-quality advertising. In a sense, ad blockers are sending a message to these publications, telling them to come up with a better experience (and yes, I agree that we at Fortune could probably do a better job of that too)."

Back to reality. Let's make a practical measurement about those annoying ads. The example is from Wired, one of those who run extensive adblock detection and blocker blocking. Here is page load performance without any blocking:

When AdBlock Plus is enabled:

The number of requests goes down from 38 to 32 and total page load time from 5 seconds to 3 seconds. I'd say that's quite an improvement! And all I have to do is NOT to load their stupid and poorly implemented advertisements. You can argue, that it's just a meanigless timing, the end time measured doesn't have any meaning and the page is actually visible and browseable about the same time. Maybe, maybe not. It's my computer, my bandwidth and I choose not to waste it into their crap.

Another example: One of the most popular websites in Finland, Iltalehti:

I have three measurements from that: one without blocking, one with only Adblock Plus enabled and finally the mode I normally run at, with NoScript and Adblock Plus. The number of requests made is high, above 100 but it is way too inconclusive. There are way too many dynamic requests being made to get a meaningful figure. The important thing is the page load times, they go down from 10 to 9,5 to 7 seconds. It is a very good indication of how much unnecessary crap a single page loads.

The obvious thing which nobody says aloud is that it is possible to improve page's performance, but nobody cares. There is something fundamentally wrong if a single page loads 100 additional pieces of data. If I'd create a website with that much dynamic loading, I'd probably be fired. But in the nation's most popular website, that's ok. Strange.

Let's look at another example: The same page, but this time on a low-end laptop running Windows 10 and one of the worst browsers there is, Microsoft Edge:

There is no adblocker available for that piece of crap. The page load time is around 45 seconds. On any reasonable browser that would be a fraction of that, not 10 seconds, but still much much faster than that. That poorly optimized turtle-of-a-browser would most definitely benefit from running a lot less bad tracking code and needless blinking ads.

As everything else, also blocking these unwated ads goes mobile, see 2016 Mobile Adblocking Report for details. It doesn't take any rocket surgery to figure out why is that. For example me playing my favorite mobile game:

Pretty much every game has those. The worst thing about those is, that they consume a lot of resources on your mobile. This is the article about the 2012 study: Free apps eat up your phone battery just sending ads and a summary of the scientific study made in Purdue University: Free apps drain smartphone energy on 'advertising modules'. The outcome is:

The free Angry Birds app was shown to consume about 75 percent of its power running "advertisement modules" in the software code and only about 25 percent for actually playing the game. The modules perform marketing functions such as sharing user information and downloading ads.

How do you comment that? You're just running advertisements, not the game.

Btw. I subscribed Wired for $1 USD / week and keep running my adblockers. Their material is good, it's definitely worth that money. I applaud them just because they are inventing such things like that.

Microsoft's policy to annoy every Windows 7 and 8.1 user to the point every single one of them will be crazy is something I've addressed earlier. My previous posts are here and here.

Couple days ago I decided to go and upgrade one of my existing Windows 7 boxes. It's roughtly 2 months time left for me to get my free upgrade, also I had been staring enough the re-releases of Update for Windows 7 for x64-based Systems (KB3035583), which every single time I see the upgrade being offered makes me laugh out loud. As you can see:

It reads:

Recommended update

Install this update to resolve issues in Windows. For a complete listing of the issues that are included in this update, see the associated Microsoft KnowledgeBase article for more information. After you install this item, you may have to restart your computer.

Ok. I chose to "resolve issues" in my Windows. In reality that's just crap that forces me to look at Windows 10 being forced down my throat. That one causes more issues than it resolves. That's a complete lie!

I carefully made sure I have backups and all necessary information and decided that I'm good to go for upgrade. But quite soon I realized, that ... there is no easy way for me to upgrade. As I wrote in my previous blog posts, I've taken drastic measures to deflect any/every possible Microsoft attempt to inject anything related to the upgrade, upgrade widgets, upgrade tools or upgrade pre-loaded files.

So, I decided to go google "windows 10 upgrade", landed at page https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/windows/windows-10-upgrade which very helpfully offers to download a tool called GetWindows10-Web_Default_Attr.exe. Downloading and runnin that does absolutely nothing! I took a peek what it does and it simply runs GWX.exe. Which of course, as a result of my deflector shields again does absolutely nothing. It just fails quietly and exits.

A new plan was needed.

Then I landed on another Microsoft page: https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/software-download/windows10. That one prooved to be much more useful. On that page, there is a download for Windows10Upgrade9252.exe which actually could upgrade my Windows.

The upgrade went fine, I didn't lose too many applications and my user profile survived the upgrade well too. The only thing I had to do was to disable IPv6 privacy randomization. This is my recipe which I run on every one of my Windowses:

netsh interface ipv6 set privacy state=disabled store=active
netsh interface ipv6 set privacy state=disabled store=persistent
netsh interface ipv6 set global randomizeidentifiers=disabled store=active
netsh interface ipv6 set global randomizeidentifiers=disabled store=persistent

Other than that I didn't do much else. And as a result I get to see forced advertisements for Office365. Crap!

I finally did it!
The unit has been non-functional for over a year now. See details in my previous post. But I got it back.

First, I'd like to clarify the myth of "equipment mode". Yes, that does exist. You'll know that your box is bricked and the reason for that is because you're in equipment mode, as your RS-232 -console output will say following during boot-up:

now in wifi mfg
g_Equip_Mode_value = 1

What needs to be done, is getting that Equip_Mode flag off. On "normal" mode bootup, two distinct differences appear at the output:

now in wifi release
normal mode, no need to load RF wifi
and
g_Equip_Mode_value = 0

My sincere thanks goes to Mr. Jevgenij for telling me a magical NVRAM-location to look at.

The brick

My bricked B592 s-22 (in equipment mode) looked like this on a boot sequence:

(Sorry about the signal LED glowing, that was my failure when lighting the box for video. I didn't realize that on my footage it looks like being lit, while in reality it isn't. A bricked box won't show any signal there.)

At power-on, the Power-LED gets lit all the others are off. Then the boot-sequence handles lot of hardware and gets a Linux to boot. They call it the "early init". There are no differences between modes at that point.

Next, what happens is the Linux-side taking control and starting to spin up services. One of the first things it does is kicking all the LEDs lit. When enough services are on, and Linux wants to fiddle with LTE-side all the LEDs go off. Now that the device is configured not to offer all hardware services to Linux-side, rest of the boot sequence goes haywire. There is no Wi-Fi, there is no Ethernet-bridge and lot of stuff fail during boot. Your best clue about this dreaded equipment mode is the Tel LED blinking on/off forever. Actually the box is not doing much at that point. It has given up all hope on getting a handle of the LTE-side or the Ethernet bridge.

Luckily, the box is sane enough to allow a SSH-login. In equipment mode, it will bypass the ATP Cli completely and land at the BusyBox-prompt. There your friend is lteat-command. Go back to my older stuff, for details about that.

The fix

The prerequisite for the fix is, that you are logged into your B593 s-22 via SSH and are able to run lteat and get sensible response out of it. Example (the blank lines happen on my SSH, I don't know why):

# lteat
AT>ati

i

Model: B593s-22

Revision: V200R001B180D20SP05C260

IMEI: 860091028600910

+GCAP: +CGSM,+DS,+ES

OK
AT>

Then you're good to go.

First confirm, that you are in the equipment mode:

AT>at ^nvrd=52110
^NVRD: 12,31 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
OK

That's a ReaD-command for NVRAM address location 52110. To change the mode back to normal, a WRite needs to be issued:

AT>at ^nvwr=52110,1,0
OK

Confirm the result:

AT>at ^nvrd=52110
^NVRD: 12,00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
OK

Notice how the hex value 0x31 is changed to 0x00. Btw. if you look at the ASCII-table, you may notice, that 0x31 stands for number 1. That's would be similar to the (1) in g_Equip_Mode_value = 1.

Now all you have to do is power-off your box and kick it back on.

Finally

I don't have a clue why/how/when my box went into this "stupidity"-mode. I was fiddling with the LTE-side at lteat-prompt when it happened. I did try dozens of different commands, any of those may have caused that.

Also, if you're unable to SSH into your box, you may need to read my or somebody else's articles. It's all explained there.

Most people just zap the spam as they come in. Typically I inspect each and every incoming one to see if there is slightest bit of interesting in it. Occasionally, if I'm lucky, there is a hijacked web sites or some sort of security mishap going on. However, most of the time I just get a good laugh because the propositions are really silly.

These are the some of the sales pitches the spammers make in attempt to lure me in:

• Congratulations as we wish to inform this email address that you have won on the on-going ASIA PACIFIC Association international promotion email lottery prize draw. In this regards, The beneficiary have been entitled to claim the sum of USD 1,000,000 ( One Million United States Dollars Only ) as cash prize.

  • Comment:
    How nice of that unknown association to arrange a lottery of $10M USD and include me in the games without first asking. Boy, I feel lucky now!

• I am Mr. David Ibe, I work with the International Standards on Auditing, I
  have seen on records, that several times people has divert your funds into their own personal accounts.
  Now I am writing to you in respect of the amount which I have been able to send to you through our International United Nations accredited and approved Diplomat, who has arrived Africa, I want you to know that the diplomat would deliver the funds which I have packaged as a diplomatic compensation to you and the amount in the consignment is £10,000,000.00 (Ten Million Great British Pounds)

  • Comment:
    This is a classic why-an-earth-did-you-pick-me -scenario: Some unknown person wants to transfer a large sum of money and I'll be getting nice slice of that. Boy, I feel so privileged to be chosen here!

• I happen to be a financial adviser and investment planner to the late president of Libya, who was killed in a gun battle in Libya on the 20th of October 2011. I have been handling most of his financial concerns and investment interests here in South Africa up to this date.
  
  I have under my management, some amount of money which the late Gaddafi had instructed me to code for re-investment for his grand children in an event he is caught or killed.
  
  We shall discuss more on this and the amount involved and the remuneration you shall receive for your efforts when I hear from you. Do get back to me.

  • Comment:
    Yet another classic: a dictator is dead and now the money needs to be transferred/invested into something. Lucky me to be involved in such a business venture! There is always something off with the written English, though.

• I am Mr.John Baker from the Office of Inspection Unit/United Nations Agency in John F.Kennedy International Airport New York USA. During my recent routine check at the Airport Storage/vault on withheld packages, I discovered an abandoned shipment that belongs to you from a Diplomat from London and Africa, when scanned it revealed an undisclosed sum of money in two Metal Trunk Boxes weighing approximately 25kg each and some people are coming after this consignment to clam it in your name.
  
  The consignment was abandoned because the Contents was not properly declared by the consignee as “MONEY” rather it was declared as personal effect to avoid interrogation and also the inability of the diplomat to pay for the INTERNATIONAL CONSIGNMENT MONEY MOVEMENT Charges Before bringing in the consignment into US and we refused to return back the consignment where it came from since, we have already received it here in USA.
  
  On my assumption, each of the box contain not less than $5 Million to $5.5Million and the consignment is still left in our Storage House here at the John F. Kennedy International Airport New York USA till date.

  • Comment:
    Oh yes! A huge sum of money was found with my name in the label. Cool! It's kinda weird, because I don't actually know any African diplomats, but still cool!

• Fund Transaction Proposal
  US$23,200,000.00 Million Transaction, for further detail's contact me via my personal e-mail

  • Comment:
    Really short one, I actually included the subject of the e-mail also. Good approach, though. Less words, less lies.

• This is a true compensation Approved from the UNITED NATION to compensate you due to maybe you has been scam before and again you may be victim of scam by wrong people who paraded them selves  on what they are not so because of this, the United Nation approved our Bank to process ATM MASTER CARD with valid cash of usd$2,000.000.00 million on your favor in order to compensate you so that if you have been scammed before this is a compensation and you will be making your withdrawals from the ATM MASTER CARD as you will be allowed in making withdrawals minimum of usd$20,000 (Twenty Thousand usd$) per a day or every 24hrs from any ATM MACHINE around you.

  • Comment:
    Whoa! United Nations is offering me free money, because somebody sent me a spam! And all that without any punctuation in it!!

• Dear Sir/Ma
  We are a financial services and advisory company based in London. Our services have been sought and retained confidentially by a top politician in one of the West-African countries with lot of Money in Cash up to USD $1 Billion (One Billion Dollars Only) for investment purposes. However, our client needs to engage services of a commodity trader, financial adviser, investment banker or a financial institution that they can transfer the funds to their possession to manage for a period of about 10 years.
  Any interested client must travel to meet the representatives of the fund owner to discuss negotiations and have an agreement with them before they release the money to them. If you are interested or can assist in handling this venture, please kindly reply me for further directives. Thanks and best regards. Thomas Bridge 

  • Comment:
    It doesn't get much Nigerian 419 than this: You need to travel to some obscure African country to receive mysterious funds. The sums have gone up, 1bn USD is a lot of dough!

This one is my absolute personal favorite:

In my search for a business partner i got your contact in google search. My client is willing to invest $10 Million to $500 million  but my client said he need a trusted partner who he can have a meeting at the point of releasing his funds.

I told my client that you have a good profile with your company which i got details about you on my search on google lookup. Can we trust you.

Can we make a plan for a long term business relationship.

Comment:
"Because my details were found in a Google lookup, I'm the most trusted partner they could find." REALLY!!?